Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Tip.It Forum

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

God Of Lego

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by God Of Lego

  1. It depends where the corruption is. If Mod MMG was getting a bigger paycheck each time he were to increase income dramaticaly then he may get the idea "Never mind the game, I want my bonus'"
  2. I think the difference between MMG running things and Andrew Gower running things is that. Andrew, he created the game. He loved the game, his main goal was to create an amazing game. As the management of the game went from Andrew to MMG. MMG did not have that kind of heart as its not his. Hes a buisness man. At the end of the day. Even if andrew was leading now, he wouldn't of done something so drastic as he was still 100m+ in pocket anyway. The difference here is MMG is on a payroll and possibly bonus' and that leads to corruption I guess.
  3. Donating cash aspect of it is just Jagex going hey look we are nice. But in reality. If someone were to really want to donate cash they would not buy a bond. They would go dirrect and give the charity the 100% rather than 5-10% max. Sure there will be the odd person who quits and blows their money on donations though. Or simular stories if they were fundrasing for the sake of it.
  4. You forgot the pay to win aspect. Player A buys 10 bonds for 30 pound. Player A sells all bonds and makes 60m in 2 minutes. That is my only problem with bonds.
  5. If you're willing to wait potentially months for bonds to raise over 600-700k more in price, then yes. They can be merched. As for making the economy stable. It wont even scratch the surface on its own. Theres still billions comming in through bots. Thats without the players. Bots will always bot. Gold Sellers will always gold sell.
  6. I doubt that many are stupid enough to try and flip them, when they clearly state the tax. Alot of bond figures dont add up
  7. That post has nothing to do with bonds. They are stating they are working on item and gold sinks. We'll see how they are when they are introduced. So no it does not make bonds better.
  8. What annoys me is that ugly crater will be still there. I actually quite liked the land before hand. They could at least of allowed a repair event. Involving farming, compost, mining and construction.
  9. I never played the big chompa before. I did today and it was awful.
  10. Im interested to see how it will slow down the decline in membership loss. We will have to wait a month to see any real effects though. Due to the fact people who quits membership needs to run out. But even now its pretty unstable. I cannot see bonds holding enough value long term to be worth choosing over RWTs.
  11. Best option for the economy was to either remove gravestones or at least cut it down to 5 minutes max!
  12. With the NIS I find the problem is its too much going through menues. The simplest sollution would be to allow us to customise tabs to allow us have the old set up look. The arguement then is only the texture and skin of the NIS.
  13. I give a new player 75k because I saw they were collecting Cow Hides and it was a really taunting sight to me. Its a new account. They must be a mule. Also remember W2 back in the day. The mass rune sellers etc? Im sure they'd be classified as dealing with GoldFarmers too. But hey, you just wanted some runes. You still traded for it.
  14. Not bad if I wanted to complete my Emote book. The thing I hated is their forced icons for SGS stuff. I liked it complete or uncomplete if were to be optainable with in game content.
  15. It isn't completely false. Certainly they make too big of a number of it, but I do believe that it will actually work a bit as intended as well. Even if the gp/irl cash rate is still bad compared to that of many goldfarming sites it is a safe alternative. Many players will for sure use this new alternative. Even if I can agree with you partly. They make too much of a 'show' of this. The way I see it is, anyone who knew the RWT market before will understand that theres legit sellers everywhere you turn. People who have handled over 2 million in total and so on. The only cut gold farmers take is in customers that are unlikely to risk such a trade. Anyone who has previously done or are not scared to go for the GoldFarm option will still buy their gold elsewhere. Anyone who is 100% scared will buy a bond. The effects are very minimal. And also GoldFamers have MUCH more botting power now. They can have a farm of F2P bots just to top up member bots membership if they wanted. Allowing even more inflation and bots. Gold farmers become stronger. Bonds are cheap though. FTP accounts are free. All they need is more bots? Bots are free. One account can pay for 2-3 bots a day. 10 accounts 20-30. 50 accounts 100-150 member bots. These 100-150 member bots can easily make MUCH more money ontop of the FTP ones. Without the risk of using their irl money to fund the bots in the first place. They now have a free opening which will grow after each month. Bonds cannot match due to the fact players decide the price. Not jagex. RWT can undercut at anytime and currently has not needed to change their price. It would take a bond 15m to match RWTs prices. Bonds are around 7-8 right now. Its not event touched the market for these GoldFarmers.
  16. I wonder what the reaction to bonds would of been if they didn't make the whole false anti gold farming speach.
  17. You can very easily fix that... That isn't a problem with the NIS, that's the EoC.This is supposed to be off by default when you have the action bar minimized. Mines always like that even with the bar minimized. xD
  18. Did it xD? Where and what did it say It was a question about not believing the statistic that 40-50% of players have taken part in RWTing. Couldnt tell you how mnay minutes into the stream it was though sorry. Ahh I seee, yes I had mentioned that somewhere. I am still warry about that stat. Most RS players are pretty open about what evil things they do. I've never came across anyone whos RWT'd out of my friends list.
  19. A player can be infinitely more effective than a bot at making money. Stakers can earn Billions daily. Dicers were making billions daily back at its peak as well. You are comparing apples to oranges. Bots which advertise gold sites are definitely a different situation. These are certainly owned by the offending sites themselves. Concidering 1 billion gold is valued at 350 pound. Stakers accounts that make billions a day constantly sell their gold cheaper to gold farmers who sell it for more over time. These guys make 1 weeks average pay in just a day or even a few minutes if they're lucky and risky.
  20. Did it xD? Where and what did it say
  21. They'll need 10-15m gold to cover membership (random estimate) im sure they'd get that per account in 1-2 days depending on the bot.
  22. I wonder if the membership count will rise alot.
  23. I actual hate seeing what has become of the game and company these days. They have time to address a money making technique for them but yet they cannot address a concern for the overall health of the game.
  24. The problem with the community is they don't understand it. They are being sugar coated by the Anti RWT/Goldfarmers debate. They think its making things nice and dandy. But no, thats not the case. It will likely only tap their profit down a tiny bit. Bots will still bot. Gold will still be sold at a much cheaper price. Jagex is making the economy swim around and gaining money from it.
  25. LEAVE BRASSICA ALONE

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.