masterdez

Would it be possible for me to join the team using veracs instead of guthans, i find it easier to use & makes me last longer. I'm pretty experienced down there too, i go on at least 1 trip every night maging or melle/ranging with 2 others.

Isn't it a far better idea to use veracs down there? I use veracs with cbow and whip, or slayer staff at dk with my friends, 3 of us go. We last 2 hours each time. How long are your ave trips?

Its to try and stop crazy inflation of rares

You can buy wool at ardy general store :-s

Tryed using the poison cure spells at dag kings, granted no immunity at all, had to constantly cast to keep psn free

I am from: England And I currently live in: England Additional Comments: I'm English, and proud \

Drink totally pure distilled water and you die :o

sara drains prayer zammy lowers mage level claws hits good thru hides

Meh, I was joking. Its very expensive to distill large amounts of water, and uses large amounts of energy. Along with climate change, with less rainfall in some areas, water will become less and less available. Wars won't be fought over it though.

So you're saying, with over 70% of the worlds surface being water over 1000m deep, were going to fight over it? Balls.

Ya, if we were in the future able to travel to locations in a matter or hours, rather than millions of years, we would do it by manipulating the fabric of space itself to create a shortcut, simalar to a wormhole, but without the problem of being blown into oblivion upon entry. We would still not be travelling faster than the speed of light, just along a different, shorter path.

Your mass increases, because as you travel faster and faster, in order for equilibrium to be maintained, your mass must be increased. (also to do with momentum) "infanant mass"? I assume you mean infinate mass? This is hard to explain but.. For example, a star has a huge mass. And it has a huge gravitational field. Aswell as pulling in planets or whatever else around it, it pulls itself in. When the star dies, it is possible for the star to collapse upon itself. So the centre of the star is pulling on the rest of the star around it, and as gravity is so large, it just pulls it all in. It is infinate because if you take the equation density = mass/volume, and the volume is 0, and the mass is large, large/0 = infinite. As the density of an object is proportional to the strength of the gravity, an infinately dense object, has an very large gravitational pull. If you were relating to the thing about the speed of light, your mass increases exponentially as speed increases, so as your speed increases, your mass tends to infinity.

Add the vector directions of the earths rotation velocity, the earths velocity in orbit, the solar systems velocity and the galaxies velocity. Ye are travelling very fast

Its a good idea to try to explain how things happen, instead of copying from a textbook/magazine. For example, what are the 7 states of matter? How do they arise? You say at the "big bang", things travelled faster than time. Time did not exist. The universe was a "point in space", not time, as before that it is recognised that there was nothing. This is simalar to a black hole(in the fact that the normal rules of physics break down, ie time does not exist). Theory states if you were to watch someone fall into a black hole (which you cant, as gravity pulls the light in which you would be seeing to see the person) they would never reach the singularity (middle of the black hole) because time slows down as gravity increases. And as a black hole's gravity tends towards infinity, time tends towards 0 (as it is approached). Also, travelling faster than the speed of light is impossible. For example, as you travel closer and closer to the speed of light, your mass increases. As your velocity reaches the speed of light, your mass becomes infinite, and your momentum infinite too. This is impossible - it would require an infinite amount of energy, which would just collapse the universe. Although, it is possible to travel at the speed of light... For example, you are standing, motionless, on a planet moving at 1/4 the speed of light. Your solar system is moving through your galaxy at 1/2 speed of light. And your galaxy is moving through the universe at 3/4 the speed of light. This is possible - and you are moving at 1.5x the speed of light, w.r.t.(with respect to) the universe. (Or something on the lines of that)

The colours - Colours that go with the render, im sure you know better than me The text Masterdez subtext "The" Clan Bordersize 1px black Limits (depth) - not sure Size 350x150 (i think) Render http://www.planetrenders.net/renders/di ... p?pos=-441 Thanks

I've read some things that said this is nearly impossible. AT this point in time, if EVERY country put together their nuclear arsenals, it still wouldn't be enough energy to destroy the world. Even if a bomb could be developed to "destroy" the world, gravity would pull the fragments back together, so things wouldn't be that bad. If a force great enough to blow the world apart did so, gravity is not strong enough to pull it back togehter...

I've read some things that said this is nearly impossible. AT this point in time, if EVERY country put together their nuclear arsenals, it still wouldn't be enough energy to destroy the world. Even if a bomb could be developed to "destroy" the world, gravity would pull the fragments back together, so things wouldn't be that bad. If a force great enough to blow the world apart did so, gravity is not strong enough to pull it back togehter...

I've read some things that said this is nearly impossible. AT this point in time, if EVERY country put together their nuclear arsenals, it still wouldn't be enough energy to destroy the world. Even if a bomb could be developed to "destroy" the world, gravity would pull the fragments back together, so things wouldn't be that bad. If a force great enough to blow the world apart did so, gravity is not strong enough to pull it back togehter...

I've read some things that said this is nearly impossible. AT this point in time, if EVERY country put together their nuclear arsenals, it still wouldn't be enough energy to destroy the world. Even if a bomb could be developed to "destroy" the world, gravity would pull the fragments back together, so things wouldn't be that bad. If a force great enough to blow the world apart did so, gravity is not strong enough to pull it back togehter...

I've read some things that said this is nearly impossible. AT this point in time, if EVERY country put together their nuclear arsenals, it still wouldn't be enough energy to destroy the world. Even if a bomb could be developed to "destroy" the world, gravity would pull the fragments back together, so things wouldn't be that bad. If a force great enough to blow the world apart did so, gravity is not strong enough to pull it back togehter...

I've read some things that said this is nearly impossible. AT this point in time, if EVERY country put together their nuclear arsenals, it still wouldn't be enough energy to destroy the world. Even if a bomb could be developed to "destroy" the world, gravity would pull the fragments back together, so things wouldn't be that bad. If a force great enough to blow the world apart did so, gravity is not strong enough to pull it back togehter...

I've read some things that said this is nearly impossible. AT this point in time, if EVERY country put together their nuclear arsenals, it still wouldn't be enough energy to destroy the world. Even if a bomb could be developed to "destroy" the world, gravity would pull the fragments back together, so things wouldn't be that bad. If a force great enough to blow the world apart did so, gravity is not strong enough to pull it back togehter...

Perhaps dictionarys will take revenge against us for not reading them.

Perhaps dictionarys will take revenge against us for not reading them.

Perhaps dictionarys will take revenge against us for not reading them.