meol

Sure, you're an ex-admin, but that's all I know from you. :P 3/10

I just randomly found this piece of music from an unknown game. Sure, it's an arranged version, but it stlll sounds really good.

Guys, let's avoid both the "I lol'd" comments and the childish name-calling, alright? I hate to be this condescending, but you leave me no choice.

Moved to H&A.

You'll have to excuse him. Far leftists tend to think ethics and legality should be bound. By the way, Zierro, do you understand they're basically indulging their racism on the basis of "they started"? Even if you don't agree with them, you can't say that is a good justification.

Nothing but more flames and spam can come out of this now. Locked.

I didn't even think that this would be that serious, but now that it's overseas I'm a little worried. Heck, I live in a third-world country in Latin America with lots of illegal immigration. You'd say I'd be the one fretting over this. We already got 2 false positives.

Nothing witty to see here. Move on.

It has never been allowed to transfer wealth between accounts, and it is also virtually impossible since the trade caps, like many others have said. Please don't ask how to break Jagex rules -this might get you banned from both the game and these forums. Locked.

Not really. It's just some made up figure some used to diss Republicans. If people are too easily dissuaded by fancy talking and false promises, the answer is not barring them from voting or setting IQ limits. Instead, political education and grass roots movements should be improved and encouraged, so there is more participation and activism. Limiting political participation like that will only worsen the problem because it'll mostly exclude the poor, who usually can't afford better education levels.

That was already suggested, he isn't happy with that :P There's a subtle difference in my link - it only lists the topics made by the poster, not all the topics where he has posted.

Now I can't see a binary number without remembering 01011001. And that makes me remember this thread, so I come here and post.

You can always save this link as a bookmark. ;)

That I'm justified to say that atheism condones the usage of faith, regardless of your useless nitpicking of your nitpicking about the different types of atheism, which are separated by levels. By the way, I thought you were talking about the drug acid. You are right - just because someone is a strong man does not make them more of a man, but when we use intangible concepts such beliefs then we can infer that the word "strong" denotes a closer relationship to something's potential or core. Strong - Intense in degree or quality Strong atheism is a more intense degree of atheism than weak atheism. If that's what is troubling you, then the answer is yes. Most agnostics would say strong atheism requires a leap of faith not unlike theism, because there's no proof (even though there can't be any proof IMO) that God does not exist.

I'm bored. Again.

Simply, "No Gods exist" is a much stronger statement than "I don't believe in God" (this is a weak statement because it only refers to a personal opinion). Since both imply a disbelief in God -thus atheism-, the names 'strong' and 'weak' were given to separate them. Way back, the more used terms were 'positive' and 'negative', but that didn't imply that positive atheism was good and negative atheism back. The terms also referred to the statements and a need to draw a line between them. -Bah, venomai beat me to it. But the point still stands.

The need to make a difference between a positive statement ("No Gods exist") and a more neutral one ("I don't believe in God"). It doesn't refer to the "purity" of atheism.

Please don't spam like this. Locked.

The guideline itself isn't new, really, so I see no need to fret about that. We still haven't got topics bumped massively and I doubt that'll happen soon. Also, remember we generally only allow contributing bumps, and action is taken if a user abuses this. And even if (hypothetically) older threads were replacing the newer ones, why is that a problem? If most users seriously believe a thread is better than another one (and the discussion is healthy and abides the rules), why should we lock the thread? Corrupt threads like "funny pictures" already get locked without the bumps, so that isn't a problem either. My point is, a topic being old isn't something bad on its own. Why do you think bumped topics should be locked regardless of content?

Not really. ;)

Please use the thread deathdrow posted. Thanks! ~Locked.

Zelda does as well, even though they can be somewhat slow. Just saying.

Expecting FMA2 had me all hyped but I'm back now after watching the first episode.

There really isn't much discussion here, and istolethepie is right. If you want to advertise, please use the sticky, or the videogames forum if the game merits a thread of its own. Thanks. Locked.

I'm deeply sorry to ruin your party, but the Rants forum seriously is no place for these discussions. Feel free to make a new thread on Eugenics in OT though. Locked.