Saru Inc

Ignore her. Hell is a figment of our imaginations. Everything gets warped, especially an idea as old as 5,000 years. Well, today I joined Tip.It. I will do very little else today as I have no school and cannot get to any of my friends. :( Everything is warped? Does time automatically warp everything? Are you sure about that?

pro; ---------------------------- in other news I wish i could fall of this planet and die right now. i feel so [bleep]ing betrayed. see today page 779 off topic.

Exactly my thoughts. Best of luck Sa-.. Bonkers. Yarr you better get mai name right ! And Nadril, it's not being overly religious that's made them this way. And that's a point I try to stress to everyone, it's simply who they are. They as humans, their personalities, they are simply not able to see the other side. And it's not because they are religious. I've been blessed with the ability of seeing both sides, for example, I'm 100% pro life, I never think a life should ever be taken, even if a morning after pill. However, I'd most likely vote pro choice, because they still have a right to make their own decision. I am not a female, I will never understand what it's like to fully be a female, and I think an abortion is an atrocity, but again, since I can't experience what it's like to be a female, should i really say no 24/7? If I were a female, would I have an abortion?

Confederates. :D Mack Trucks. Like I understand they are the life blood of the nation, bringing us all of our food, and it's not really rational but: SPEEEEED UP !

They live with their parents. lold

Yeah. She ignored it. My family is really good at writing stuff off if they don't agree. She said... Well I'll just quote my post from the other forum I frequent.

I came out to my sister. She said I love you but know you need to change your ways, or else you will go to hell. I won't tell mom or dad because I'm not a douche, but just know, it's not an ok lifestyle choice. And it's hurtful that you would think its ok. Wow. Really don't want to be at home at this point in time.

And that's the clincher. That's actually not true at all as to why I believe as I do. In fact, you could not go farther from the truth. And the mere fact that you would state something like that clearly lets me know, that in all honesty, you're just saying stuff to say it.

So what is exactly is the point? Filming run down houses for ghosts? Evp stuff is just ridiculous. Why not go and film your friends houses? Just because it's abandoned bears no correlation to the amount of ghosts in it.

Here's a philosophical question: Why does he choose to post in red, yet claims it is "friendly" and is only a mod? Red is an aggressive color. Mods are green - if anything, the text should be green. What has motivated this strange animal to choose red above the vastly superior and more logical green? I think he is trying to make a point by making the color red because red attracts the eyes, and he only says it is a friendly warning to make the post appear "kinder" and not as aggressive. But in fact, he is being aggressive. Or he's being kind, but firm. Which is completely possible.

But just on the point of Matthew 19:11-12, the author of the article writes "It seems clear in Matthew 19:11-12, that Jesus did not expect homosexual eunuchs, born eunuchs, gay people, to abstain from loving, committed, same sex, marriage relationships which observe Biblical moral principles." I don't read Matthew 19:11-12 as saying anything about Eunuchs having a loving, committed, same sex, marriage relationships which observe Biblical moral principles. Well that's because you have to study the entire Bible to get the context right. I mean there are verses in the Bible in Proverbs stating "Food is better stolen. Steal your money and let loose your sexual inhibitions, these are indeed great things" (Or something along the lines of that, forgot the exact verse.) But when taken in context with the entire chapter it's frowning upon all of those things. This is also why I have a problem with Churches, Pastors in general tend to do that as well. Not take context in mind, or use all the wrong context. If the pics do not exist, I must acquit? Bah.

So is that -2 because your here and your a clown? No, because it's inefficient. And because Lowc values efficiency higher than other things. And Lowc is posting his opinion, thus if you're inefficient you cannot expect a good rate from an efficiency oriented person.

Because "many eunuchs tended to be homosexual." As well as the fact that since a marriage isn't a marriage until consummated, so since eunuchs and homosexuals could consummate in the same way a heterosexual couple could, they are not bound by the same point.

What you should be asking is "Who's tax money will go to exorbitant salaries and million dollar vacations?". If it wasn't for the fact that most of the tax money doesn't help the people paying taxes, I wouldn't be so pissed. I don; want my tax money to pay for some kid to attend college only to party, illegal immigrants' healthcare and cellphones, people abusing welfare, multi-million dollar vacations in the middle of a recession, and other crap like that, like it is now. No, what I should be asking is what I already asked. ;) I don't want to pay taxes, but you have to, to keep this economy alive, and that's true anywhere.

It's subjective, but old people tend to get grumpy over little things such as technology (like trying to text or email) I'm 21, and I tend to be grumpy over little things such as technology (like trying to understand the appeal of Twitter, Facebook, MySpace, incessant text messages in class, and automatic transmissions in cars) I detect a hint of not true in that post. You're seriously stating that you cannot comprehend the appeal of instant communication? Of affordable and easy driving of a car? Of knowing how you're friends are doing, incase they are feeling down or so?

what a ka-hah.

Oh, I really just thought this article was interesting because I once had a debate a long time ago on this forum. And they had aid if there was proof that the miracles could have happened scientifically, then they'd believe. I think the user stopped coming here a while ago, but its still some nice food for thought. It isn't a case of being homosexual that is the problem. The problem instead would be if he were to actually have sex with another man. He also understands the limits of it. I think he's said that Leviticus, which is the main book openly against homosexuality, was intended to be a set of guidelines for an ancient society wandering in the desert. That is right. Leviticus outlines a very specific set of laws and it is odd that Leviticus 18:22 is still given with such authority in the Christian churches as a passage against homosexuality. That being said, in the New Testament there are few places where Jesus mentions homosexuality, but whether he explicitly does is up for consideration. Usually he will speak in general about sexual impurities and it is left ambiguous as to what he encompasses in that term. Some will say you must therefore go back to Leviticus to acknowledge that homosexuality is a sexual impurity and he means to encompass it in that term, and others that it is important simply to read what Jesus actually speaks of in the New Testament. There are other places that speak of it too, but then translations from ancient greek and hebrew become important. It doesn't really matter anyway because it is quite clear in the Bible that sex should only take place in marriage, and since that is between man and woman, if sex between male and male is not considered sin through it being homosexuality, it would nevertheless be considered sin because it is out of wedlock.

You'll get wise once you hit 15 or 16. Or when you get into highschool. Not sure if trolling... Anyways, the thought comes up every time I think about what I want to do later in life. People: You have to do well in school. Me: Why? P: So you can go to college. M: Why? P: So you can get a good job. M: Why? P: Either A, to buy the expensive status symbols, or B, to support a family. M: A, I think carefully before I buy something. I'd rather buy a beat up looking $2000 car that runs great than a shiny $200,000 car that runs great. As for B, why in the HELL would I want a family? I don't want to live my life entirely for someone else, especially when those people would ultimately end up doing the same crap I did, or I would make so much that they don't have to work because of inheritance, in which case they become spoiled brats like Paris Hilton. My ideal life would be to live in a small house. Hell, all I would really need is a bedroom with computer area, maybe a game console, a bathroom, and a small kitchen. I'd also like to live in an area with stuff to do around town. I would work a decent job, with decent pay, and not too demanding hours. I don't need to spend a fortune a day to be content. But this life is not possible, mostly due to BS. The main reason I wouldn't want to work for ANY business is because of that [bleep]ing income tax. It's BS. As far as I'm concerned, nobody has the right to take the money that I EARNED, pretty much just as an extra source of income for the government. My dad pays a 30% income tax. Unacceptable. What. You don't wanna pay taxes? So who's gonna pick up the trash around town? Enforce rules? Fund the government? Surprise, the government does. And surprise, they earned the right by creating a successor society to ask a tax to be part of it. And being homeless isn't cool, you might think it is, but it isn't. Trust me.

Edit, I was browsing the webs and found this. (off topic in a sense of the central OP, but relating to my 2nd to last post) http://www.gaychristian101.com/Homosexual-Eunuchs.html

find me a sock a sock, that rocks.

30 seconds to mars

You seriously look like my brother I'm not kidding. IT is scary. and we share an irl name. Goddamn it, this is freaky. I got to train some people today at my job :D And I almost got in huge trouble because 22 minutes into a call listeniing to someone rant (the average call is 1-2 minutes or less.) I said "ok maam I've heard you say the same thing over and over, you need to stop talking and listen to me. This is the message center, I am hundreds of miles away from where the lawyers office is. I do not know why he is not in the office, I'm not blowing you off, but frankly I find it bizarre you expect your lawyer to be in his office at 1 am on a Saturday night. If you had done as I asked, you probably could have gotten a return call by now. Now, with that said again I would be more than happy to take a message for you, maybe I have your phone number please?" *grumbles out the number* Ok, I'll let him know you called, is there anything else I can do for you today?" "[bleep] you." "Have a great day!" Then I found out my boss was listening to the phone call. I lold. Also owned some prank callers, they are always so funny to own. Typical one today "Thank you for calling dr ____ office, Sam speaking, may I help you?" "hi. my husbands *explicit* is really really big and i want to know if you want to see it. (note this is way way way over simplified and censored" (and admin/mods, if this seems too racy feel free to remove it, I'm not trying to push the boundaries, but I've seen way worse on this topic :| ) "Let me see if I can help you with that, may I ask who's calling?" " :shock: " (you can tell that's their face irl) "lady gaga" "Ok ms. Gaga, I'll be happy to ask the Dr to return your call, may I have your phone #?" "yeah ___ *insert explicit into number*" "Oh I'm sorry Ms. Gaga, did you mean __________ ? (Read the caller id on the screen :PPP ) OH [cabbage] OH [cabbage] OH [cabbage] click. Tooooooooo funny. So dang funny.

Real mature.

A guy who wanted to tell a badass story? If you've been wandering in the desert for many years, what's a better way to imagine your ancestors? A small group who quietly crossed a river to freedom, or a group that was chased by hundreds of soldiers while said river split to allow them across? Then it wasn't true? Okay, please, I just want the Bible to be taken as a exaggerated tale of history, not literal history. Nothing personal to ALG (ilu bro yeshomo) but Pasta, you're taking an Agnostic's word on how the Bible happened, shouldn't you be taking the Christian point of view if any? (And what I mean by that is if an Atheist says something happened in the BIble, and the Christian disagrees, go with the Christian. Even if they are a "foool" they've studied that book long enough as it is.) A guy who wanted to tell a badass story? If you've been wandering in the desert for many years, what's a better way to imagine your ancestors? A small group who quietly crossed a river to freedom, or a group that was chased by hundreds of soldiers while said river split to allow them across? Then it wasn't true? Okay, please, I just want the Bible to be taken as a exaggerated tale of history, not literal history. It is an exaggerated tale of history. The stories were passed from mouth to mouth, translated, rewritten, and interpreted over thousands of years. And in addition, anyone who takes it literally would have to believe some pretty crazy things, including that anyone who is human should be drawn, quartered, and dragged around town behind a horse. Which leads to a question for Saru: How can you take the Bible literally, but be homosexual? HEY HEY HEY NO NEED FOR LABELS. I prefer the term Hypoallergenic to the matriarchal species of this planet. <3: That's a very good question, one I was stumped on for many many years. (Which was also exacerbated by external forces) every remember all the manson lyrics I had in my sigs? Yea, that was a by product. I couldn't figure it out, I know God exists, but how could he create me to be Gay, and then say all Gays must go to hell? Then I realized a few things: (please note these are all based off of my personal beliefs... and just because this has happened in the past, feel absolutely free to disagree, but please refrain from the mocking) One, being, as long as I believe Jesus died for my sins, and is the one and only Son of God, I cannot go to hell. And please don't extrapolate that (see the previous paragraphs) as too "oh so i guess you can be a serial killer?" Second, I was studying and reading and studying, and I finally went online as well and I discovered this nifty little site. It basically states that the whole part of Leviticus is made for priests. Thats why there are such rules as, no man on man sex, (or any sex period), no eating of shellfish, non kosher food, destroying houses with mold in them, and stoning rebellious youth. The priests of God were meant to be clean, and all of these things "dirtied them." Thirdly, and I say this with hesitation, I have read (though to be honest I may be wrong, as I have not studied this much at all) but in the Corinthians verse where Paul I believe it is, states flat out all Homosexuals will never inherit the kingdom of God. Well, apparently he used a term (I'm about to butcher this) called like the Arsenokoia or something, greek for essentially man boy [bleep]s. :| Who preyed on the weak, were extremely indulgent, and essentially were priveleged douchebags who made life worse for everyone. Paul called them Arsenokoia (or to be honest it might not have even been that term, but it was a long term that was reminiscent of that), being judgemental as he is, and that was translated into homosexual. I think Gaga might have influenced them in that translation. And with the ending of that paragraph, I run the risk of eating my words when I say this: (to the bolded part of the aforementioned quote) It hasn't been simply blindly translated playing the telephone game of the story of the Earth. The believers who wrote the Bible believed if they missed one comma, mis used one word, they would be struck into hell. Remember, the old testament god wasn't the hippie God of the New Testament. With risk of being sacrilegious, old testament God was downright bad. ass. Anyways, so they took very very careful care of God's word. Sure I have no doubt the peasants might have had their only little parts, and as it's commonly known there are also books that *should* be in the Bible but are not. But for the scribes who actually wrote the Bible, there was very few things (if any at all) that were lost in translation. It isn't a case of being homosexual that is the problem. The problem instead would be if he were to actually have sex with another man. I've had sex before. ;) Not all Christians are prim and proper. *On a more serious note, in the eyes of many Christians, unfortunately even being gay is a deep deep sin. And if you are completely celibate and try your whole life to change, according to them, you just aren't trying hard enough.* I love you. Yes. homo. It isn't a case of being homosexual that is the problem. The problem instead would be if he were to actually have sex with another man. He also understands the limits of it. I think he's said that Leviticus, which is the main book openly against homosexuality, was intended to be a set of guidelines for an ancient society wandering in the desert. Gud murmery, vary gud.

No World for Tomorrow (album) - Coheed and Cambria