That's why we have these things called inquiries, for when two people's account of events don't match up with each other. You can't automatically trust someone, no matter who they are, when they are the accused. Only, these cost money, so are usually conducted by an independent body commissioned the authorities. As far as I can tell, no inquiry has made at all into this. That in itself makes me suspicious about the police's guilt here. Maybe there's something they don't want appearing to the public? In which case, just apologise and spin the usual crap about how 'procedures have been changed to ensure this doesn't happen again'. I doubt the police ever apologises,they just fire who did it. :roll: