The Observer

I pour saline on it which has a higher boiling point. 62 HP

Actually, he's going to make the mods mad and they'll hand out the padlocks.

Just because a sport "requires more skill" than the other it doesn't mean it should be named one thing over the other. That's ridiculous. Each sport has a different set of skills required to play them. If you go by the logic of one requires more skill than the other, then if American football required the most skill, then you would be able to play every single sport on the planet with ease. Names are there because of what they're originally called or because of what the majority calls it. Debating over semantics is a bit silly in my opinion. Whatever a country wants to call a sport, they can call it that. Obviously there's boundaries to that as well, but you get my point. Just because you name it something different it doesn't make it a different game.

I'd go so far as to say that there is not even any real depth to such perceptions as "good" and "bad" - be it a person or their actions -, simply because they are such vague terms. Interpretations of good and bad vary from person to person, and continually change over time. Something that would have been acceptable just a few centuries ago, e.g. owning slaves, is thought of as 'bad' today not because it categorically is, but because the general consensus in our society says that it is. Good and bad are very loose terms, and there is no such thing as a good or bad person or even a good or bad act. There is some form of perception even if it requires a general consensus. Sure it does change, but there are reasons why laws and social implications exist. If they face those consequences, then it becomes something that is generally thought as bad. I guess what I'm trying to say is that even though good and bad are fairly loose terms, it is recognized in some form or another. If there weren't any good or bad, then laws or social sanctions wouldn't exist. However, you can say that it would be more so "bad towards..." or "good towards..." than being bad or good in general. Those things that are prized or take priority tend to be more important than other things. (eg. society over personal gain)

The problem is the aura won't be covering the entire time so it will be fairly unnoticeable. As many above have stated, it's best to wait a week or two before data becomes fully available.

I pour water on the wall. 62 HP

The game Oh dear.

There is no such thing as a "bad person" or a "good person"; there are just people who choose to do good things and there are people who do bad things. Judging the entirety of a person using a limited amount of actions against a virtually limitless amount of possible actions is a bit silly.

wat Ah, thanks for catching that. I haven't used a godsword in a good year or two.

I agree with Accursed. Put in more than 750k. Something like 3-4m is fine.

Yes you can, but if you use the crush option it will be a controlled attack. Crushing is an aggressive attack, so yes it will train Strength. I wouldn't recommend a godsword because the attack speed is far too slow. I don't think you'll have any problems whatsoever using a scimitar or a whip. Any problems can easily be avoided if you use a super attack/strength set with piety.

Redrum

Some people have better memories than others. There's no harm in keeping a list handy. It's not like there's some drastically important need for the in-game notepad that it's taking away from.

Not sure where we would find a gif like that except from some really kinky pornography site.

To be fair, the auras don't add a massive amount of element to your gameplay. Knockout is useful, but it only adds like 5-6 kills per hour. Sharpshooter is only a 3% increase, but it obviously depends on what you're killing. If you're slaying then it's not really a massive advantage to you unless you happen to be ranging all of your tasks (and even then, only a 3% increase). So I wouldn't shed too many tears about which one to buy. I personally bought the Reverence prayer because of the fact it was 400 points marked down from 5000. I wouldn't be able to buy it if I didn't. The way the points are rewarded anyway shouldn't completely deteriorate the chances of getting another one anyway.

I don't think a lot of people use dragon bolts anymore and instead use cheaper ones such as broads. When it comes to dragon bolts in general, more people would use the enchanted versions more, so not sure which one you were looking at. That means less demand overall, so the price won't increase too much.

So that's where you've been. Nice to see you around still.

Unfortunately Retech, the majority of voters are stupid, for lack of a better word. This is why regular political processes tend not to work.

Runescape is addicting whether you think so or not. It doesn't even have to be the game itself. Take the clanning world. I didn't play the game, but I dedicated a lot of my time towards the clanning side of things. It is just as time consuming, if not more.