darkmage099

Certainly there are situations where there are more than two options. If that were the case, my reasoning would be faulty. However, in the case of truth, there are only two options. Truth is saying what is. If I what I say matches reality, it is true. If what I say does not match reality, it is false. Where is the third option? Either a statement matches reality or it doesn't. But if it cannot be proven either way, it is neither right nor wrong. This is a third choice, non? Although, I see what you are saying. What if you cannot see if it matches reality or not? So if you cannot prove it is right, then it is wrong. If you cannot prove it wrong, then it is right? If it does not match non-reality, must it be real? I understand that Truth is saying what is. However, just because you cannot prove it to be true does not exactly have to be false. but...it cannot be true without proof? :-s Edit: If I sound stupid, I am just confusing myself. :|

Are you from the south...? :shame: I like root bEEr.

That's something very important. Some mods manage it, many don't. It's also something very difficult. A mod involved in a heated debate may be tempted to abuse his power. While I agree mods needs to be involved in discussions just like regular users, we need to choose people who can do so without it getting in the way of their job. That is true. Insane was quite good at that actually.

Truth = saying what is. Falsehood = saying what is not. If it is not a true statement, then by definition, it is wrong. Time for a basic lesson in logic: the Law of Non-Contradiction. This is a fundamental principle of logic. Something cannot be both A and not-A at the same time. For example, if I say that my right shoe is on my foot and is also not on my foot at the same time, my statement contradicts itself. Therefore, it is false. Is there such a thing as truth? Just because something is not A does not mean it is -A. It can be neither. I do not think he is saying it is both A and -A, but rather that is is not A nor -A. If your right shoe is not on your right foot, and you say your right shoe is not on your left foot. That does not mean it his false. It can be on no foot at all. If you said your right shoe is on your foot and it is on no foot at all, you are contradicting yourself. Then, it is false. I guess it depends on the situation?

+1 -5 You lose! I want to see a SPECIFIC moderation team. This team can only mod for OT and no other mod can mod for OT with the exception of elite admins. I also want the mod team to be extremely active and participate in all discussions like they weren't mods.

Me too!!!!! It's good. I like most soft drinks.

One was posted... it got locked That is exactly why I said it. I think it's totally ridiculous. I don't even care if my name gets posted on every single posted (Ha! I wasn't mentioned once... :cry: ). It's just fun.

Ghost: Umm....Didn't the church finally admit that the center of the universe was not Earth in 1996. You can't say all of Christianity supports science.

But that is really just an excuse. Nowhere in Islam does it say violence is right.

We need a thread that says who DO you dislike. I am sure most people are indifferent or like people on these boards rather than dislike them. A dislike topic would be much more interesting. Of course TIF would NEVER EVER EVER EVER allow that so....screw it.

ScapeRune. That gamed sucked badly. It needs a revamp.

Mate, if you read it, you should be able to see that he's highly unlikely to actually have problems, let alone kill himself. He thinks he's suicidal in the same way that "gangsta" kids think they're hardcore and oppressed. Well, even if he is doing it for attention, should we not comfort him? Offer him comforting words? No. Ignore him and tell him to go fly a kite. Then one day, he might have an epiphany and realize how dumb he really is.

That was the most ridiculous think I have viewed in a while. Damn media is usually wrong. I mean how many of you actually use that stuff? P911...I mean come on...

I only play IRL poker with friends and family. No real money or anything. I prefer rummy though. It's way more fun.

That was an amazingly good book. I am currently reading Great Expectations by Charles [bleep]ens. I just recently read A Tale of Two Cities (also by [bleep]ens).

hahahahaha Kyle: So wait...who who was behind 9/11 Stan: Some pissed off Muslims. What are you, [developmentally delayed]ed? That was an amazing episode.

So uh you guys are getting married and you are both homosexuals, right? So are you guys still allowed to have girlfriends/boyfriends irl if you are married?

Local Man Creates a Monopoly on Toilet Paper. He Now Rules the World. Canadian Becomes President of North America. Edmonton is the New Capital. : The Real Life James Bond?

What's amusing is that I am quite certain if Bond dies - it will be at the hand of one inept guard who shoots him while he's trying to pick a lock. Nahh, he is too cool for that. He'd shoot the guard first for no apparent reason. Besides, no one can shoot Bond unless you are totally evil...like Baron Samedi or something.

Actually, they were not even rebuttals. They were merely his opinions of our rants on the article. He never responded to specific points. Therefore, it is not a rebuttal. Good job though piecing it together. I like it.

I have heard it is horrible. I will post some more links when I find them.

James Bond never dies :wink: That's the whole point... I don't die. If I do, it will be very heroic and probably with a girl nearby. We will all weep for Darkmage...I mean James Bond....I mean Darkmage...I mean... :boohoo: :boohoo:

A bang such as dynamite put 'up' a certain area? Yes, I would like a stick of dynamite put in my behind. That...would be cool. :anxious: That was completely random. No one said dying is "cool" (which is an opinion, obviously). You can't live forever. I'd want to die a James Bond death.

Alrighty. Elaborate. I just can't believe this one :roll: :lol: You have two options: 1. Take my word for it because you know I am right. 2. make me write out an essay 20 pages long that explains why Canada would rule the world. This, however, would make me extremely mad, and I would not do it making you automatically switch to option one. Thus, proving Canada would rule the world if it were not for Hitler... Hitler cannot even stop Canada! We will...take over. You watch. :ohnoes:

1. America would not be where it is today 2. we wouldn't have such highly developed WMDs 3. Women would not have the same rights they do today 4. Canada would rule the world