Faux

Ban for being an arrogant moron and evading the filter. And the irony is strong in you. You call them closed minded people when you're the one acting all arrogant? Besides, aren't you the gay guy? How are those girl pants holding? You're a sheep and you don't even know it. You let other people affect your choices in life. Just because other people like what you like, it automatically becomes garbage. You follow the same people that pretend to be hardcore fans and move away bragging about some band no one knows. Bands go mainstream for a reason, it's because they tend to make good music. Chances are, the bands you listen to will never make it to the 'mainstream' because they suck. Mainstream is stardom. And stardom is what most bands strive for. Life must suck for you.

Awesome! You got all of that in this statement? "I have but one thing to say to you Klu Klux Klan.. religion of peace.. right." Kindly point out to me the recent atrocities caused by Christianity?

You didn't say anything. Lol. ..no offense but did you have a tampon in your eyes when you where reading it? Seems as though he does that a lot. A LOT! It gets quite tiresome repeating what you said over and over again. Ive had to do it a lot with this one. Lol, so what exactly did he say?

Norm where? In those communities, maybe. In the world, no. You just compared that 'tradition' to ones that occured centuries ago. In case you didn't get it, you just stated that those people who practice that tradition belong in the society that only existed hundreds of years ago. Meaning that same society should've been abolished by now. You didn't say anything. Lol.

"Always On Your Side" - Sheryl Crow & Sting

Tell me about it. I can't wait to have a Wii just for the purpose of kicking Kayla's cute bum. :ohnoes:

Man, I expected better than this. -.- Alright, the tub/pool hint. It's a redo of an old franchise and it was so awesome that there's going to be a sequel for it coming out around 2008. Now for the second picture. It's a band in a parade. I'm gonna end up having to twist someone if no one still gets it.

Offtopic: Lol @ OT Smileys ( :uhh: :ohnoes: ) OnTopic: I use Fox when playing good people. But I tend to enjoy playing as Sheik or Link when playing with average players.

If we don't count grilling, then eggs. No one can crack an egg better than me 8-) Seriously, I rock omelets for breakfast.

Religion of peace at work. Still sad to see something like that though.

Riiiight. Because Lotus Elise and Aston Martins are sooo much better than the Veyron. Porsche Carrera GT. The 997 Turbo is awesome as well, couldn't find the pictures I got saved of it though.

Realists are downright boring. Girl or guy.

I get a leg cramp when I go swimming. I tend to push my legs too much. It hurts a lot and almost drowned when I was in the deep end and my leg started to hurt :$ Good thing my gf saw me.

Buwahaaha

Just to make things clear, these are the images to guess which movie they're from: Check my other posts for hints.

Are these the same? ---- 1. al-Queda hijacking 3 planes and crashing them into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon 2. The US is retaliating in terms of the terrorism they received during the 9/11. Is one more justified than the other? Yes. Motive ---- Military - seek and demand justice from the terrorist group Terrorists - spread fear Means ---- Miltary - asks for surrender and face justice, use force if denied. Terrorists - suicide bombing. Answer is no. It isn't as bland as just 'defend interests' and 'violence' because even then, they have a conflict of interests. With your logic, you might as well go to the police department and call them murderers because they kill people. Heck, with your logic, I can kill an ant and you'd call me a murderer because a I killed a living creature. Your logic is flawed.

Yeah, because war and terrorism is as simple as eating. Their means or motives are as different as night and day.

When you said that they use the same 'means and motives', that's saying they are one and the same. Do you know what 'means' is? It's how they act to achieve their goal. Do you know what their 'motive' is? It's their reason for acting so. So yes, you are saying they are the same thing. It's moronic to say that military and terrorists aren't the same and then say that they have the same motive and means. Heck, you didn't even counter the difference between the military's and the terrorists' means and motives that I posted. Do you call policemen murderers because they kill people?

No one saw this coming.

Stop going in circles. This is what you say: TERRORISTS = US MILITARY Then you'll say something like this: US MILTARY != TERRORISTS So which is it? Your posts contradict each other. When you say that the US miltary (no, not even the US milary, every military in the world) uses the same means and motive as the terrorists, then you're saying the military is the same as terrorists. That is what terrorism means. By YOUR definition, EVERY soldier is a terrorist. As I already said, stop trying to change the definition of terrorism.

The edit button exists for a reason. Stop triple posting all the time man. Ontopic: I also have a small collection of books, though it's fairly small. Majority of it are Hardy Boys.

You do know that your posts have been contradicting each other, right? Lol, first quote, first mistake. Thanks for supporting my opinion though. This is what you said earlier: Countries = multilateral. Hence, what you said was arms race, not terrorism. Even then terrorism can cause multilateral fear as well. Canada was affected by the terrorism in the US. That means terrorism doesn't only affect one country. Hence, terrorism = multilateral fear as well. Yes, it matters because I was giving example how the US army doesn't do 'terrorism'. What the heck? I wasn't talking about fear generated by military actually. You did. I was just pointing out that you're saying they are the same. I'm saying they're not. Yes, you're saying we both like pastas. Perfect interpretation, no? I was proving the differences of motives and means between terrorists and military. That's what I've been arguing for throughout. Uhh.. riiight. How about when you said this: So by your posts, how are they not the same again?

With an eye closed, yes you did. You said military was the same as terrorist because of this: I proved you wrong. That's not terrorism, that's arms race. Then you said this: I proved you wrong again. The US Army, when on the offense, is at war, not terrorizing. Now you said this: Fear generators = terrorism. But then you said this as well: Again, making your opinion military = terrorists. Last time I checked, "do the same thing" means that you're saying they are the same. Hence your post: Then you have the nerve to say this to me: When I posted this to explain. http://forum.tip.it/viewtopic.php?p=3334636#3334636 Then you're gonna tell me this? I'm sorry, but I don't like playing Where's Waldo.

Are you seriously a moron or are you just trying to troll me?

Fool.