x1992x

As an Atheist, I would avoid making nthose kind of arguments. These kind of weak arguments which question the nature of God will only lead to a form of 'God works in mysterious ways' or some weak possible reason for his actions. Questioning the nature of God gives the religous the upper hand because they are able to invent a theoretical reason (or use a previously invented reason) which cannot be disputed because further reasons, especially self-enforcing (cyclic) reason can be used to 'back up' their point and it'll make them feel awfully smug. Also questioning the nature of God can accept the possiblity that he exists. Basically tread carefully when asking those questions it can lead you into awkward situations where you ask such a question and the religous can make an answer of his choice up. They will always have an (invented) answer. It doesn't really get anybody anywhere. well if thats there best counter arguement, i can laugh at there ignorance :lol: and my question still stand, and it's a good arguement for that god don't exist or is "good". if you look at my post on this page, i am getting better and better soon i will become god almighty! muhahaha. so evi... i mean good!

The problem is that you are trying to bring faith to a logical argument. If I have faith there is no god, who's faith is the superior faith? You're free to suppose your own ideas with a lack of logical/rational basis about unexplained phenomena, but to hold them up to be as good or superior to scientific and rational arguments disingenuous and just wrong. Pretty well said =D> Look at my last 5 post on this tread, i keep asking for proof and not "faith" but i'm not getting any proof :? But look at this if you want to [cabbage] the bible: http://beta.vreel.net/watch_8366.html

That statement requires proof. Proof which is currently unavaliable. According to your standards of truth, proof is currently unavailable. But your standards of proof are astronomically high; those that I have never encountered in another person before.his standard of proof is not high at all. but you cant even give him little proof or even a glance of proof -.- Why is that offensive? If we believe the Bible is a source of truth about God and his character, and if we believe the Bible is inspired by the Holy Spirit, then it is indeed truth about God revealed by God, which fits perfectly the definition for an autobiography. And thanks for the oh so clever pun directed at my username. the bible. http://beta.vreel.net/watch_8304.html thats my comment on the bible ;) So you don't believe in anything, then? he can feel his skin, he can see and touch it, that is real. and nearly all things fits in his standard, it sad that any of you're proof dont fit any of it my response is in bold :D (i dont know you post just made me angry :wall: )

http://beta.vreel.net/watch_8304.html watch that. i mean really watch it, and then talk to me about the bible :ugeek: ;) and if you can kill those arguements then gods is real, but you can't. i am going to count the time from my masage to reply on it ;)

Well i know my language is not that good ;) i don't capatilize "god" because i don't believe he is real. and you have yet to present a solid proof to me that he is real -.- and nomoredead make very good arguements, and i don't think he is arrogant ;) and if he is real and made it all. why the [bleep] did he make cancor and aids, why the [bleep] did he get the roof to fall down on a church and kill alot of people. if "god" is real, he would't want to destroy what he made. br1ng m3 3vid3nc3 pl0x

now where is nomoredead when you need him #-o I'll step in instead for Nomoredead (but not quite as harsh). Well, who says that it can't be the energy leprechaun or any other ficitonal explanation I care to come up with? The unknown is not proof of God, or any other magical being or anything for that matter? I don't know the origin of that Energy; but nor do I take the easy way out to answer the question by using my favourite answer (which for you is 'God'). I will accept that I do not know the answer until I have compelling evidence that strongly suggests/proves how the event and process of the Big Bang came into existance. In this respect, your argumentative skills are dire... And you've been doing so well aswell. Thank you, oh' boy how crazy i am looking forward to day day where "god" is proven not to exist :D (Or proven to exist, which seems unlickly, because with every year that passes science comes clooser to explaining and dissproving "god" existence) But i agree, Lenticular you are good at making arguements, but our side are good aswell :D

One flaw is your uncapitalized 'I's. :lol: Flaw in my senteced not myself :D

the picture was removed by a mod. he got 99 mage, but in the bar lowest on the screen there was a program called "auto clicker" so that's why we are hating him :thumbup: ;)

i can set down in september and think back 6 years

i'm looking forward to the next movie :D (come on we all know there going to make nr.3)

damn how i hate that show. it's so oblievous that it's made up.

i dont think i got a flaw, i think i am perfect as how i am. (wow that sound nazist)

call that an arguement? using something that you got no proof for. come on you need proof something there is 95% safe. you can do better then that -.- and using a thing bacause you think it is not and arguement. now where is nomoredead when you need him #-o

you're right, science is not flawless, but comparing "science" and the bible in terms of flaws, the bible wins hands down. because there is something you can't argue. that there is ZERO proof that god exists ;) but if there is proof that god exist then please post it, because that's what this tread is about "is god real" but so far i havent seen any proof.(but if there already is posted some then please show, i might be forgetting some)

[/hide] Wow.. Too lazy to click a mouse? That's... Pretty sad. he just joined :D and now he should leave. we dont want that kind of sad rulebreakers here. to the mod removing it. we already saw it it's out there, and i don't think people like him anymore(if ever) -.- gtof or forum rulebreaker :|

well i have a [bleep]ed up sense of humour :lol: but me and my friend are pretty weird after being up 24 hours :D so one it ended in we keep saying "Ses på grillen"(see ya on the grill) idk but we sat for 30mins(yes 30 mins) and laughed like beavis and butthead. damn we had fun(we also completed the hole hl saga that day)

signon.stofanet.dk ;)

Indeed. but this is runescape so everything is kind off odd :lol:

some my answers are also in bold. if you would like to i know a person who can change gender on you're kid before it's born ;) and meny other things(haircoler, skin color, eye color, and soon how high) and carbon dating is VERY accurate way of dating, right down the + - 10 years now. and we're only getting better at it :)

Wait...come again..if guns were banned, it would be socially acceptable to own one? :? i'm sorry that you misunderstood me so much. i meant. if guns were banned long time ago, then one can argue that there would't be as meny gun kills. bacause there was no guns, and i wasnt socially acceptable to own.

i'm sure i am going to be flamed for this :lol: but one can argue that if guns have been banned since, let's say 1945, there would't be so meny guns out there, and it would be socioly accepted to have guns(like in Denmark).

to yuor friend. that is pretty true. i killed 5k no drop in sight -.- but then he got serios unluckyness. and he should consider killing a new monster ;) he should consider human sacrifice to get some luck :| if he tells the truth he should consider sacraficing lumbridge or varrock :| or even sacrafice his left arm irl :? :P :oops: and rofl at the dude who made the tread:D little brother haha

to yuor friend. that is pretty true. i killed 5k no drop in sight -.- but then he got serios unluckyness. and he should consider killing a new monster ;)

yes. and 5k is nothing try 20k -.- (not me a tiffer did that)

hit the head of the nail. thats what people mistaken my post for lol -.-