Viktorkrum77

Why should they have to? If I asked you to give up every single one of your heterosexual urges, and become gay, would you do it? No, you wouldn't be able, even if I gave you a prize beyond your wildest imaginations. Murder is good for society, they're called population controllers.

Neither are woman who cannot conceive, people who are born with disease that will kill them off at early ages, etc. Disease, mutations, homosexuality even are good for a society. You need to control population size, this helps, without these, we would run out of food and space all be doomed.

I repeat, ever heard of a MALADAPTATION!! What about the 1000's of woman who are perfectly straight and married and cannot conceive children?

Where is FireFox's spell check options? I want to type in words so they don't appear underlined as incorrect, and if it's possible, I'd like to see if I can make a list of my most misspelled words, since sometimes they're so badly misspelled it can't figure them out. I want to add "should've", FireFox says it's not a word, along with "occupiable".

I agree entirely with the bolded. People should not be identified by labels of sexuality. I therefore propose that the "gay rights" movement be abolished, since it promotes the labeling of people by sexuality. But you can say the same about Racism ie. Civil Rights and the Feminism Movement. These include things like Affirmative Action, an equality in the workplace. We can't abolish these, but they also label. I've read like 2, that were probably not the bad ones you're referring to.

Exactly, why would a Republican government destroy the headquarters and offices of corporations like Morgan Stanley, Fiduciary Trust, Cantor Fitzgerald, Marsh USA, Bank of America, AON, Fuji Bank, Salomon Smith Barney (Now Citigroup), etc.

Which could easily be their cranium... I wasn't aware their brains functioned. I assume it would be worthless, since you probably can't damage their neurons any further.

Here's some WTC7 pictures not shown on conspiracy websites. The 3 penthouse ones are part of a video that conspiracy theorists cut short to not show the penthouses collapse. The side you do not see on conspiracy websites: The Eastern Penthouse begins to fall: It pulls the Western one and collapses inward: The Western penthouse begins to collapse: The 18 story gash, responsible for many fires, as well as structural damage:

Tripsis, let them go at it, it's not even that bad. They always do anyway, well someone, on other debate threads. It encourages discussion, and is usually not that bad anyway. You need conflicting beliefs to have a good argument.

What is pokemon's amazing marketing scheme? And your friend better hope that the cards he has will go out of print and won't have a similar card made. Some magic cards are like that. However, don't count on it, yugioh usually has doubles of their cards later, like the blue-eyes white dragon or something. Yea, that's how they killed it. I think they were trying to eliminate private sales of cards. Pok̮̩̉̉mon was the first to come up with an amazing method, that is cheap, and was the first to mass market it, well Wizards Entertainment anyway. See, the rarest of Pok̮̩̉̉mon cards (street value, $100+) cost the company maybe a $1.00 to make. A common costs around 5-10 cents, so add that together, 7 cards per pack is around 70 cents plus wrapping. Holographics were closer to 50 cents each, so packs ranged from a $1.00 to maybe $1.50/$2.00 to make a pack which was sold for $4.00 retail. Then they were sold wholesale for $2.00 or $3.00. And kids bought them like drugs due to the mass amount or money they spent in successful advertisement.

Exactly, that's why it's an amazing marketing scheme.

It's such a bad investment. My friend had me hooked, and I must've wasted more than $500 on cards. He's wasted more than a $1000, I told him he better sell immediately, and he rejected saying they won't decrease in value. But he had to eat crow when he still owns them now and they're practically worthless. I admire Pok̮̩̉̉mon for their amazing marketing scheme.

Area 51:

According to the policy, you wouldn't know. So you may have already.

After pasting the printscreen, instead of clicking out of the past feature that allows you to drag the pasted object around, just drag the whole printscreen to the upper left hand corner, so that it's already cropped. Then just drag the canvas in until the right and bottom sides are cropped. It's a lot easier. :)

Yo mom's gonna do the unspeakable. ^Worst and laziest form of 'yo momma' comebacks.

Ever heard of maladaptation? Didn't think so. But it's useless genes that are not harmful, like homosexuality. Homosexuality may have arisen several million years ago from populations like us humans, where there are more females than males. Oh, so by your logic, we should split guys and girls from each other in school. Because what if some 'geek' guy has a fantasy over some girl in his class that is way above him and grossed out by him? Hey, why not just split the world into six sections, one for all the males, one for all the females, one for all the gays, one for all the l3sbians, one for all the bisexuals, and one for everyone else who doesn't fit the above categories.

I want to die directly, why suffer through seemingly endless pain or be depressed about the future?

Yea, my schools just as small, maybe even smaller (650 kids in Middle School and High School combined, 250 in high School), and we don't really have this sort of thing, everyone accepts everyone pretty much.

No, being gay is having sexual tendencies to someone of your own sex. What you mention is acting upon gay urges and tendencies.

Isn't that good enough for you? When ever homosexual discussions come up I get the feeling the homosexuals want to change someone else's morals. If someone thinks homosexuality is wrong what gives you the right to tell them to be more accepting? If they are so passionately in love with their views why not accept that? After all you are passionately in love with the idea of people accepting homosexuality. Take a leaf out of your own book and accept other peoples views. Respecting someone's opinion is fine, but when that person uses his or her opinion to almost be 'prejudice' and take control where that opinion should be irrelevant, is another story.

After thinking it over, I don't really believe Viacom wants to sue Google, but wants to pressure them into setting up new YouTube policies for copyrighted material. If Google does so, I assume Viacom will drop the lawsuit.

They believe it may lessen morale in homophobic soldiers.

How do you feel about this, but more importantly, the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy, and homosexuals in the US Military. And that the discharge of 65,000 homosexual troops and 50 Arabic/Kurdish/etc translators has cost the US around $175 million.

Somebody trying to make a quick buck.