Kiriyama

She puts out? (okay, maybe thats too far). You must like her alot though. Still, you choose the film next time.

Not every boss is hard on your first attempt. I beat the Hunter on PoP with relative ease, and that was the first PoP game I really played. Alot of Final Fantasy early bosses are as easy as mashing attack and casting cure a couple times, or using potions. I'll agree if you say that its when you really start to progress in a game. Infact, the only game where I'll say an early boss can be hard (from what I've played) is Shin Megami Tensei: Nocturne. It relys heavily on your party and its weaknesses. Matador anyone?

Admittedly, it was on easy. And yeah, I forgot I had retailiating slash aswell. He's still pretty hard when its your first attempt against him.

No, what you got was ripped off.

Google is a more feasable God than any of the dietys in religion. You try proving that a God exsists, and I'll prove Google exists. If I can prove that Google exsists, and you can't give me definate proof of a higher diety, then Google is a god.

Honestly, with that kind of attitude, you're more likely to get a kick to the nuts. You should be going for the sake of being with her, not for getting something out of it.

I'll agree with Lent and say go for it. To me, it looks as if she cares about your opinion, while it could be just as a friend. (Albeit, this comes from some personal feelings in that I only really care what 1 person thinks about me, if I cared what my mates thought of me, I'd have had a haircut and I would't be growing it) However, nothing ventured, nothing gained.

And another thing.You shoot me with a sniper shot to the head.Being folmer_veeman,I catch it (Die if you don't get it) and disarm you.Thusly,you die.Wait,wait.What? Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...... I failed to get that. Shame on me. Someone get the beating stick, ASAP! See his sig lul.Headshotcatcher. But yeah its kind of stupid.All these years I have trained for this fight.Now I will kill with my disarm spell.I mean,if you don't want to use an unforgivable,at least use something more...Epic. I think it was more... symbolic of Harry's unwilingness to actually kill another. Though, to be honest, it was kind of a wimpy way for an end. "Oh look, here comes a disarming spell with the ultimate wand, I better just go and pop my cogs right now" Seriously, what sort of damage can that cause? Just disarming you for a few moments? Why did he just use a jet of water to blast a hole through Voldemort, or even stab his eyes with the wand. I mean, I know the wand is powerful, but it can't be that powerful, hell he should have at least aimed to stun. Oh and N0M, I get where you are coming from about LoTR, but, its still got a better chance than HP of best the best series of books. The first few HP books were short, but they were great. However, then Rowling tried increasing the length of them, and really, it was all about the same thing, they don't know how to do something, and it takes several chapters with alot of non-related filler before they actually work on it and figure it out.

Yeah, but the two movies would have to be done perfectly, as not to leave a major cliffhanger during the gap between releases. Honestly, I wouldn't mind going to see a 5 hour film, if it was worth it. I'd prefer it than going to see half of it, and leave feeling a bit ripped off, then having to return a few months down the line to see the second half. Besides, I would end the first when [hide=spoiler]Harry and Hermione visit Lily and James' graves[/hide]. It would give me the sense of an ending, without feeling that it ended too soon.

But, when you look at it from another point of veiw, their rambling about with very little in the way of knowledge just made it all the more pointless. Infact, they pretty much just came across each Horcrux by luck, even when they had a general idea of what they were looking for. At points, the story just seemed a repitition of the last chapter which basically stated "We don't know what to do, so we'll sit here, then move to the next isolated spot hoping to come across some inspiration". Though, a film of Deathly Hallows could be redeemed on how they do the battle at Hogwarts. If thats done right, then it'll be a good scene for a battle. Oh and rocco, I wouldn't say that you could argue that the Harry Potter series is one of the best written. LoTR vastly surpasses it, in a sense it goes into more detail, with at least 1 major event every 2-3 chapters, and it goes into far more detail, while remaining interesting during multiple read throughs.

Well, I was more or less referring to how revan skips the Sam and Frodo parts... But yeah, some parts do seem like more pointless wandering than anything. Not a bad thing, after all, I do like the detail into which Tolkien goes about the journey. Honestly, I think that the book wouldn't be as great without the amount of detail that Tolkien goes into about Sam and Frodo's journey. Whereas in Deathly Hallows, Rowling seems to have attempted this and failed. While Sam and Frodo kept moving, what was happening in Deathly Hallows? Sticking in 1 place most of the time, planning the next move. Got more repetitive the second time through than reading the entire LoTR series 4 times through.

The one in Kh 1 seems to be harder then 2 whatever anyone says KH1 seph was incredibally easy, KH2 was harder IMO KH2 sephiroth doesn't do a good job at killing you if you have the right abilities equipped (retaliating slash, high jump, glide helps but isn't necessary, second chance, once more). KH1 sephiroth on the other hand, killed you very easy, even with the best abilities equipped. Actually KH2 Sephy is beatable without the best setups. Hell, the only drive ability I had equipped was High Jump Lvl 3. Honestly, he does take some skill with only that, since you can't get high enough to stop the attack that totally obliterates your HP and MP, infact I only won because I had elixirs (Heal HP and MP right?) set on L1 + triangle. Which was pretty much an auto-counter for his next move. And even using that tactic, it took about 10 tries, with multiple keyblades (Ultima Keyblade most of the time, the one that gives you MP Berserk (I think, it gives endless combo when you are recharging MP anyway) is the one I finally won with, and even that took a few attempts). Oh and I was level 66 when I actually managed to beat him.

Well, thing is, you could. Any excuse for getting hammered.

What the hell? Why? Those parts are the whole point of the books, the quest to destroy the ring. Wandering through the wilderness complaining how bad the ring is gets boring. So I don't feel need to re-read those parts. I do enjoy the meeting with Faramir though. Don't read Harry Potter. Hah, thats true. Alot of Deathly Hallows is more pointless wandering than Return of the King and Two Towers, and if finishes too soon.

As my sister says "Australia Day is just an excuse to have a beer and a barbeque, while playing cricket in the heat and getting cancer." You actually need an excuse for that?

What the hell? Why? Those parts are the whole point of the books, the quest to destroy the ring.

Actually, I would find it hard to imagine playing a FPS on a computer, I'm that used to controllers. And really, you should see the PS3's graphics on a decent T.V. MGS4 for example.

Used to be a fan of Eminem, still am, I just don't listen to it much. But, I quite like some of the stuff by Ludacris, Young Jeezy, Lil Jon and more which I can't remember at this time.

Oh, my bad. I wish people would use the quote button... Most people don't if its the post above, and its clear they are referring to it.

Better to act like a kid when you're more likely to remember it.

No, Google leads you to these false idols in order to help cover its greatness to those who are not ready.

I'll agree on the "Damn you, Disney. Damn you." They do cram alot of this romantic crap down your throat, then aim the programmes at those around age 12 and under. I remember they we never used to have all this romantic crap in our programmes when we were their age. Though I don't see why they are trying to be "mature" and have a relationship. They should be enjoying themselves.

Yeah, but being in a relationship at 12? Honestly, I don't think they've really grasped the concept of love. Sure, we can probably all admit to feeling a strong attraction to someone at the age of 12, but come on guys, how many of you now look back and regard it as meaning nothing? (Oh and 12 would be 2004 for me)

Made me think of her as an obsessive person that we should all be backing away from. As quickly as possible.

When the topic has been dead for a year, all point has come out of it. That being said, there are a few that were actually pretty good, yet have died.