Battlefront I or II?

[dwarfdude3]

which do you prefer?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I like 1 way better cause II had so much emphasis on missions and objectives. 1 you could just run around and capture command posts however you like. Also, you can't go back to previous levels in II on the main campaign.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Though I will concede the jedi and space fighting was pretty cool, I think 1 still beats it out due to the aforementioned flaws.

[Continuum]

Battlefront II wins because of the Jedi fighting and space battles.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Surprisingly, every time I play a space battle, I think of zooming through the battle in a Cylon Raider. Then I get depressed due to the lack of any Cylon Raiders or even any Cylons and play something else. :(

[Giordano]

I like the first one better, it has more of an 'Star Wars feeling' to it. Plus in the second you could just barge right in the CP and capture it....there was no real 'lines' of territory as the first one.

[king_kenny69]

Space fighting wasn't as good as it was made out to be.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I expected to be in a battle something the size of the one at the beginning of episode 3, manning those huge artillery guns as an enemy ship came within range, and POW! Alas, the ship guns are actually pathetically weak, and it isn't even possible to blow up the enemy's cruiser.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jedi fights were nice though.

[dsavi]

I like 2 better because of Jedi, and lots of people have h4x3d maps so they are heros vs. villiains or 5000 super battle droids vs 2000 jedis. And some maps are challenging.

[Randox]

2 is better. As I recall you cant run in the first 1 and the droidekas were just nasty to fight. But I'm a bit biased because I own battlefront 2 and veary rarly play battlefront 1.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Also the vehicles bother me alot in #1.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On the flipside, the graphic for the EMP was definatly better in #1, and I do miss flying around the spire in a LAAT/i.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But still, I preffer battlefron 2, for the vehicles, space battles, and jedi if nothing else. Oh, and killable droideka -.-

[Continuum]

The Droidekas are still pretty hard to take down in Battlefront II. They've gone and killed me while playing Obi-Wan plenty of times.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Guess I should really start using the Jedi blaster-block thing. -.-

[runescape_rocks]

2 is better becuase of jedis and the ability to rack of kills. :lol:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

i suck at space fighting, and it's hard for me to land in the hangar.

[megakiller32]

How about

 

 

 

Knights of the Old Republic?

 

 

 

I think they both werent very good, because they were mindless and repetitive, but ill choose II because its a nice psp game :thumbsup:

[stevepole]

I prefer the maps from the first one over the maps from the second game.

[barnstormers]

i have the 2nd one and i have played my friends 1st one. the 2nd one is the better than the 1st one.

[Spazbot]

In the 1st one i liked the abilty to use space ships on land battles and flying over the battlefield shooting dudes. (especially on the cloud city level). The maps in the 1st one own the second one by heaps and when i'm choosing maps for the 2nd game i take forever because they all suck.

 

 

 

The second game is better than the first in the fact that it has space battles but they get boring pretty fast.

 

 

 

Overall i enjoyed the 1st a whole lot more...even though i never bought it, only hired it like 10 times....could've bought the game with that money.

[AniseCookies]

II, because of the Jedi, both playing and being able to actually kill them and not having to blow them off the edge of the map like in I :P And II because the day it came out, I was ranked 69th overall :wink: But then quickly fell into the thousands, haha.