August 1, 200718 yr yea but what if each team has one best player? and all of their best players are better than all of the other conferences best players. that doesn't mean any one of the teams in one conference is better than the other. and maybe the teams dont play the other conference very often. but still just look at the records of inter-conference games from last year.(including the finals.) Look its rob!
August 1, 200718 yr you cant decide which conference is better through an allstar gane :wall: Why is that? Standings can't be decided throu each conference because they barely face the western teams, vise versa. All star game is The Best of the Players on Eastern Confernce, and the best out of the Players of the West The all-star game is a publicity event - hence the term 'all-star weekend'. Just because you take the top (most popular) players from each conference and stick them together on the court means nothing. Basketball is a team sport - hence I determine the strength of the conference based on the quality of the teams, not players. And the all-stars aren't going full out the entire game like they would in a real one. Quite often, even if it's only a quarter or two, there's some playing around involved - nothing too serious. They really only start stepping it up near the end of the game.
August 1, 200718 yr Author fine lets compare conferences between their players:p Eastern Conference: Dywane Wade Lebron James Jason Kidd Vince Carter Richard Jefferson Paul Pierce Ray Allen Kevin Garnett Chris Bosh Jason Richardson Shaq Ben Gorden Rashard Lewis Rip Hamilton Jermaine O'neal (top 15 players) Western Conference - - - - - - - - - - - - Kobye Bryant Steve Nash Marion Nowvistki Duncan Yao Ming Tracy Mcgrady Allen Iverson Carmelo Anthony Durant? Oden? Pau Gasol Chris Paul Deron Williams Carlos Boozer - If i missed any1, or u say some of the spots are arugably tell me:p --Quit--(As of December 22th, 2007)
August 1, 200718 yr you forgot parker and ginobili(sp) and marion is in no shape or form better than either of those two above or nowvistki or duncan Look its rob!
August 1, 200718 yr fine lets compare conferences between their players:p Eastern Conference: Dywane Wade Lebron James Jason Kidd Vince Carter Richard Jefferson Paul Pierce Ray Allen Kevin Garnett Chris Bosh Jason Richardson Shaq Ben Gorden Jamal Lewis Rip Hamilton Jermaine O'neal (top 15 players) Western Conference - - - - - - - - - - - - Kobye Bryant Steve Nash Marion Nowvistki Duncan Yao Ming Tracy Mcgrady Allen Iverson Carmelo Anthony Durant? Oden? Pau Gasol Chris Paul Deron Williams Carlos Boozer - If i missed any1, or u say some of the spots are arugably tell me:p i thought jamal lewis was a Football player lmao
August 1, 200718 yr oh wow u forgot about All NBA First Team Amare Stoudemire on top players from the west :-\
August 1, 200718 yr Author Hey, I added a poll to see what everyone thinks! Here it is: (results will be updated at night- every day) Poll: -> Who got the better of the blockbuster deal(info on the bottom)- 1) Minnesoitia 2) Boston 3) They both got what they need --Quit--(As of December 22th, 2007)
August 1, 200718 yr In short term, the celts got the better team. in long term the timberwolves got the better deal. But i think if you are always preparing for the future, you are never gonna win which is why im glad the celts did this. we still need a pg though :wall: and no money to spend Look its rob!
August 1, 200718 yr Author yeah their pg is like Rondo lmao:P. Theirs lots of people who they are intrested in signing like Troy Hudson, Brevin Knight, Keith Macleoud etc. --Quit--(As of December 22th, 2007)
August 1, 200718 yr The Minnesota-Boston deal, I think they both got what they need. Minnesota got a bunch of rookies who will eventually become very good, and help the Timberwolves in the long run. Boston will now be a tough team to be with Pierce, Allen, and now Garnett! But, in the long run, I think Minnesota got the better deal. Garnett, like other "old" players will eventually become worse and worse, while the rookies that were traded to Minnesota are young and will only get better, which will give them good players and the opportunity to trade.
August 2, 200718 yr The thing is, these rookies better end up getting something accomplished, otherwise Minnesota has just traded for Ainge's unsuccessful strategy (over the past four years) of stock-piling young talent.
August 2, 200718 yr unsuccessful? seems pretty successful to me, we just got two amazing players. Look its rob!
August 2, 200718 yr Author ~*~ New Report ~*~ -> Boston Celtics have signed point guard-> eddie house to a deal in which he gets paid 1,5m - 1 year. --Quit--(As of December 22th, 2007)
August 2, 200718 yr unsuccessful? seems pretty successful to me, we just got two amazing players. I think you've missed my point. Ainge drafted all that young talent for the future. They've clearly not developed fast enough for Pierce's patience (playoffs anybody?), and hence you trade them away. I'm quite sure it wasn't Ainge's original intention to do this - it's just that if he didn't, he'd probably lose Pierce and not have anyone capable of carrying the team left.
August 2, 200718 yr Boston, although they pretty much both got what they needed Last.fm: http://www.last.fm/user/Aaronm14/MY FAVORITE BAND:http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fu ... d=64310717And the bible is the big book of lies, call me a racist if you must.
August 2, 200718 yr I think Minnesota nad Boston got what they needed. With three stars, Boston will become an instant playoff contender, though I doubt that they can take it all the way. Minnesota gets alot of new talent, but they are gonna be pretty bad this season . If the new guys don't produce in a few years, then they could end up looking like total idiots. Still, Garnett was doing nothing for the T-wolves and I do agree that it was time to try a different strategy. "Nobody cheers for Goliath" ~Wilt Chamberlain~
August 3, 200718 yr yea eddie house is exactly what we need, with his .8 apg career average. :wall: we have 3 major starts and we need someone to dish it to them Look its rob!
August 3, 200718 yr yea eddie house is exactly what we need, with his .8 apg career average. :wall: we have 3 major starts and we need someone to dish it to them if they were smart theyd sign brevin knight. i dont know why he was cut from the bobcats that guy can dish out 8 apg on any given night. with ray, paul and garnett... he could double that
August 3, 200718 yr Author guys.. as a nj nets fan, Eddie HOuse was good- although he missedalot of games.He is a good point guard, vetran, and threepoint shooter. Their the experience they need. Hes better then rondo:o --Quit--(As of December 22th, 2007)
August 3, 200718 yr Author ~ New Poll Released ~ -> Who do you think will be the WORST team in the Nba this coming season. A) Memphis B) Charolette C) Minnesotia D) Atlanta E) Seattle F) Portland G) Other-> Say which (Im going with Portland) ** Note, Polls give us soemthing to discuss, but if you have any rumors, or any NBa related things to discuss-> ALWAYS feel free!:) ** --Quit--(As of December 22th, 2007)
August 4, 200718 yr Author ~~~ NEW REPORT ~~~ Eddie Jones has been signed by the Dallas Mavericks to a 2 year- 4 million $ contract. This will obviouslyon make the Mavs better, and give them more experience. I think thats a very good signing for them. --Quit--(As of December 22th, 2007)
August 4, 200718 yr ~ New Poll Released ~ -> Who do you think will be the WORST team in the Nba this coming season. A) Memphis B) Charolette C) Minnesotia D) Atlanta E) Seattle F) Portland G) Other-> Say which (Im going with Portland) ** Note, Polls give us soemthing to discuss, but if you have any rumors, or any NBa related things to discuss-> ALWAYS feel free!:) ** Memphis... unless Mike Conley becomes another Chris Paul.
August 4, 200718 yr Author I dont think Conley will be what Paul Is/and will be. Paul will be a top 3 pg in the next few years, right now hes probably 4th-5th best. I think Conley will score less. --Quit--(As of December 22th, 2007)
Create an account or sign in to comment