chemical1988 Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 fresh from the drawing table with animation: without animation: what one is better? k Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razzzzzza Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 its grate i love it thanks !!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cadburys_egg Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 why is that person appearing then dissappearing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chemical1988 Posted February 10, 2005 Author Share Posted February 10, 2005 why is that person appearing then dissappearing? why do you always ask why.. he just is its ugly if theres 2 identical ppl on it and you cant see the detail I put in it in the actual person so its like a close-up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sragral Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 why is that person appearing then dissappearing? why do you always ask why.. he just is its ugly if theres 2 identical ppl on it and you cant see the detail I put in it in the actual person so its like a close-up I think the blinking thing is just annoying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Despaxes Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 as do i, and you use the burn (i think thats the right tool havent used ps in forever) tool too much, you should do shading and then burn if you want, the guy is WAY less detailed then the bg and i think you should detail the man the most consideruing that that is usually the focus point thanks everyone for the sigs! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chemical1988 Posted February 10, 2005 Author Share Posted February 10, 2005 .. your right about the detail. but burn tool..? never heard of it :roll: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ran_Shadow2 Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 its not pixel :? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chemical1988 Posted February 10, 2005 Author Share Posted February 10, 2005 well no one would look with a diffrent title :lol: and besides what makes something a pixel anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ran_Shadow2 Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 something thats not made in photoshop? just good old paint :wink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chemical1988 Posted February 10, 2005 Author Share Posted February 10, 2005 lol..... why would you limit yourself to paint? its hard enough making them in photoshop everyone their style I guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ran_Shadow2 Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 coz thats what pixel is, yours is brushed. its like painting a painting and saying ooo look at my pencil skills, they are different genres of art Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tttia Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 I don't see anyone paying millions for DaVinci's old pixels... just stick to brushing! That is not overly brushed anyway. I like this one! But I have to agree, the flashing thing is annoying. IN fact, the close up is annoying. Just get rid of it and leave the cool buidling. Othewise, much better work this time. You fixed the blurriness for the most part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chemical1988 Posted February 11, 2005 Author Share Posted February 11, 2005 :D well I would remove it but the guy I made it for likes it better this way.. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razzzzzza Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 yeah i prefer the animiation it looks better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quer_Skulll Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 just remove the close up, its ugly.. annoying.. just the guy and the building would do.. dont limit yourself to your buyer.. o btw.. i dont see any burn tool used in there.. the lower left leg.. is off in some way.. his fingers on his left hand.. are to big and his plate needs a more interesting shape.. (im rating the actualy drawing.. before putten into a sig) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chemical1988 Posted February 11, 2005 Author Share Posted February 11, 2005 so what is the burn tool anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toad Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 i think paint sigs look better than ps or any other brushed "pixel" sigs :P still nice though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Jeppoz Posted February 11, 2005 Share Posted February 11, 2005 :roll: Not going to waste other 2 words on the fact it's not a pixel or that the flashing thing is simply outrageous for eyes/taste, I think it's pretty hard to define this a brushed sig... Looks more like a lineart filling one... No offence, the overall look (again, if we forget about the flashing dude) is pretty nice and clean, but in my opinion lacks of all the details a brushed sig should have. (points at TTTIA sig for reference). A thing simple as this could have been nice with some vector graphics, but the trembling lineart realy messes it up a lot in the final appeal... (That's also the main reason i don't like "brushed" illustrations). So if you plan to improve the style i suggest you redraw all the linework so that it's clean and straight, giving the sig a taste of finished, hard worked on stuff. Keep it up :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts