October 21, 200718 yr well, it is really just lines filled in with paint bucket. Here are my suggestions. ~You saved it as jpg, never never never never ever do that. Save it as png. ~Anatomy. You can't have a person with the head bigger than the body, it wouldn't look right. (Pretty much perportion of the body) ~Shading, don't do just 2 colors and call it shading. Shading is gradually going from light to dark. No all of the sudden. I'm sure i missed some stuff, i'll let other people catch it. Good luck in the future
October 21, 200718 yr My EYES! A paintbucketed JPG! *hissss* Five kittens out of ten.. I agree with panda.. Here be dragons ^ Dragon of the Day
October 21, 200718 yr Author thx as i said before its my first and still unfinished. i just needed some tips to improve it
October 21, 200718 yr thx as i said before its my first and still unfinished. i just needed some tips to improve it Welcome to Tip.it. I suggest that you start reading the Gallery Rules, FAQ and Resources, there are also Pixel Tutorials included. Ill leave this topic open so people can give you advice, instead of saying what is bad about it. [http://woopidoo2.deviantart.com][Tip.it Moderator from Dec 10, 2006 to 03 Sep, 2008]
October 21, 200718 yr and why png instead of jpg whats the difference? Png is higher quality, and with JPEG you get all kinds o funny colored dots around the image.. Here be dragons ^ Dragon of the Day
October 21, 200718 yr and why png instead of jpg whats the difference? Png is higher quality, and with JPEG you get all kinds o funny colored dots around the image.. If thats the case, is there any reason why people made JPEG? Does it save any particular thing better? On topic: What I don't understand is why it is darker on the side facing TOWARDS the moon, while it is lighter on the side facing AWAY from the moon. You completely messed up the shading. Own a forum? Advertise it for Free!!! Forum Promotion - Free Forum AdvertisingThe Freelance Mind - Freelance, Graphics, and Webmaster Discussion forums
October 21, 200718 yr and why png instead of jpg whats the difference? Png is higher quality, and with JPEG you get all kinds o funny colored dots around the image.. If thats the case, is there any reason why people made JPEG? Does it save any particular thing better? People save JPEG for uzzisot siggs Here be dragons ^ Dragon of the Day
October 21, 200718 yr and why png instead of jpg whats the difference? Png is higher quality, and with JPEG you get all kinds o funny colored dots around the image.. If thats the case, is there any reason why people made JPEG? Does it save any particular thing better? JPEG was created to save memory space, although it ruins the quality of a picture, it does knock its file size down quite a bit as well. (sigs are sometimes JPEG's for uzzisoft) As for the original pixel, i suggest more variant colors, more shading, and the fixing of a couple anatomy problems Quote Quote Anyone who likes tacos is incapable of logic. Anyone who likes logic is incapable of tacos. PSA: SaqPrets is an Estonian Dude Steam: NippleBeardTM Origin: Brand_New_iPwn
October 21, 200718 yr Saving an image as a .jpeg doesn't automatically ruin it... When set to 100% quality it's no different than a .png, and it's very useful as .jpeg is one of the most widely supported file extensions.
October 21, 200718 yr Saving an image as a .jpeg doesn't automatically ruin it... When set to 100% quality it's no different than a .png, and it's very useful as .jpeg is one of the most widely supported file extensions. PNG works in firefox and opera.. and i think most programs support it... it does not work so well in IE though.. at least version 6 The following statement is true. The previous statement is false. 60% of all statistics are made up 90% of the time andrew i love you & want you to have my babys!!! Finally, I get to save the Earth with deadly lasers instead of deadly slide shows!
October 21, 200718 yr and why png instead of jpg whats the difference? Png is higher quality, and with JPEG you get all kinds o funny colored dots around the image.. If thats the case, is there any reason why people made JPEG? Does it save any particular thing better? JPEG was created to save memory space, although it ruins the quality of a picture, it does knock its file size down quite a bit as well. (sigs are sometimes JPEG's for uzzisoft) As for the original pixel, i suggest more variant colors, more shading, and the fixing of a couple anatomy problems Just an FYI but my signature was saved as a .jpeg. If you compress it correctly there isn't a large quality loss. @OP: It really isn't good, just looks like some kids doodling on paint. Try and read up on anatomy, shading... well, everything.
October 21, 200718 yr and why png instead of jpg whats the difference? Png is higher quality, and with JPEG you get all kinds o funny colored dots around the image.. If thats the case, is there any reason why people made JPEG? Does it save any particular thing better? On topic: What I don't understand is why it is darker on the side facing TOWARDS the moon, while it is lighter on the side facing AWAY from the moon. You completely messed up the shading. Lower file size. And shading isn't a real biggie IMO. Try two tone shading with shadow. danke Schon Sam!^^"Blood runs thicker, oh were thick as thieves you know"-Carl Barât
Create an account or sign in to comment