January 5, 200818 yr I think that it is easier this way. But I also think that there should be a system of demerits and checks so that the amount you can trade fluctuates if you do something wrong. I also think that if the person has been on your friends list for over a year, then you should be able to have unrestricted trade with them. But that will never happen. i r tink tht a11 ppl shud use g00d gr@m3r since g00d gr@m3r is ftw.
January 5, 200818 yr ya unless someone can figure out a way that has a 100% success rate like jagex's method (though i think 100k would be a better cap them 30k) then jagex will most likely not accept it, so in other words figure out a way regular players could give 1M gp away and not allow RWTs to get it. I'm working on starting a web design buisness and a bookGoals-90M/100M-Top 2.0k In Smith-26m as F2P(+lvl 79 Smith)United SmeltersÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Å¾Ã¢ Association-FounderNuclear Co. MSC-OwnerMy Merchanting Guide
January 5, 200818 yr I'd think that it would be more fair to instead have it to where you get points for each month you have been playing, with black marks factored in. Everyone starts out at 0, and if you stay clean for 2 years in f2p (1 in mem, since they get double the points a f2p gets per month), then the trading restrictions don't apply to you. The trading restrictions become more lenient with the number of points you get. You lose points by breaking rules. This is about as fair as it gets, for all involved, and will also keep players from leaving. Everyone wins! \ :thumbsup: You never know which rabbit hole you jump into will lead to Wonderland. - Ember3579Aku Soku Zan. - ShinsengumiYou wanna mess with me or my friends? Pick your poison.If you have any complaints about me, please refer to this link. Your problems are important to me.Don't talk smack if you're not willing to say it to the person's face. On the same line, if you're not willing to back up your opinions no matter what, your opinion may as well be nonexistent.
January 5, 200818 yr Maybe add tha blackmarks decrease the amount you can trade? Someone who has been playing for 1 year with 9 Black Marks isn't my idea of trustworthy. ~It's Super Effective! (The Zaaps Blog)~My YouTube Channel, where you get to watch me go around and make a fool out of myself and all comp capersGuides:~Yeah I wrote them once~Suggestions:~Yeah I made those once~
January 6, 200818 yr I think this is a pretty cool idea rather than that qp limit.. Thats just a way to do further discrimination on F2p.... I support!! Fools!! Having Wilderness Pking back is harder than Letting camels pass through the needle's hole!!
January 7, 200818 yr I don't understand the logic of this topic. What would stop a bot/realWorldTrader/etc from just farming accounts today so they could be used next year? The whole idea is that jagex can lax down their anti bot/rwt division and use more manpower on actual updates. This idea makes them reverse that effort and must use as much power as before on stopping rule breakers. I must say you are naive if you think that real world traders are just level 3's cutting yews with short lived accounts. The movie that was filmed in a sweetshop that had 5 level 126' accounts is a proof that should not be ignored. For one. 21 lag piles, 4 Pjs, 2 Party hat kills, 67 newbs teached.
Create an account or sign in to comment