IQ defeats BC

[bear1108]

Link to the declaration: declaration topic

 

Winning clan (both name + initials): InterQueo[iQ]

Winning clan's member-list: IQ memberlist

 

Losing clan (both name + initials): BlitzCreed[bC]

Losing clan's member-list: BC memberlist

 

Starting/ending ops of both clans (screenshot is valid proof):

 

IQ Starting: (23)

 

 

BC starting: (21)

 

waiting for a pic..

 

Photos during war:

out of center bounds..

 

 

Last photo:

 

 

This is my last photo as the remaining BC members logged out and waited for us at the portal spamming: "IQ cheated". I said to everyone in IQ to logg out and not to flame but it wasnt so successful.

They state that we pulled more than 5 rangers and they said they have pics so I'm waiting for the pics.

 

 

In the declaration topic the war world: 30 and their leader just came to our chat to tell that they are waiting for us in world 95.

As we wanted to war we hopped.

 

 

 

I'm waiting for the pics from BC and for a mod's decision.

Hope there will be no flames in this topic.

[TimDownfall]

Nicely done IQ, better luck next time Bc.

[Danny_TeamDan]

Gratz; Ranger caps are such a pain to deal with. Yet so many clans insist on doing them.

[thiesje]

Well done IQ.

[Ray0608]

gratz to iq :thumbsup:

[Uffan5]

Gratz IQ :thumbup:

[aptoswarrior]

23/30 ml nice pull iq :)

[Vince4rock]

Nice win IQ :thumbup:

[lordhotshot]

Nice IQ.

[Pan_Nx]

Gj iq

[thetateman25]

i believe you had over the ranger caps although by the time we thought to take screenies we were only able to get 5 people although that really doesnt matter since you were pulling people not on your member list.

 

Check Ladamama (refer to picture posted above of people they pulled it is the level 91) and possibly others i stopped checking after that. Nice try though

 

Also IQ Hunor and I croas I are not on the memberlist either

 

[Sasake1350]

(ONLY REASON THERE'S 15 OF THEM LEFT AT ENDING OPTS IS BECAUSE I MADE ALL OF MY MEMBERS JUMP THE CC BECAUSE IQ BROKE THE RANGER CAP)

 

You guys broke the ranger cap weather you admit it or not, nice honor :\. We're pulling our screenies together and hopefully we will be able to prove that you DID beak the range cap. However, I'll live by the code "no picture no proof", so if we can't manage to catch your cheating ways I won't complain - Better luck the next time we war you.

 

And also - Your two runeheads, is BULL. Cause there is no way that I could have seen or known about it until you told me after the war when I questioned why you pulled members not from your main runehead. There was no way for me to check if you were pulling people within the 48 hour cap.

 

I consider that pulling "friends/allies/non members" you can even tell by your post, you fail to include that you have two runeheads at the top of the first post on this thread. I won't say that you guys lost, but you certainly did not win.

(taken from this topic)

 

 

You accepted to warring us with that memberlist, and failed to mention you had a second - case closed.

[IB0nerLoL]

K

[thetateman25]

I have just seen your second memberlist which is a load of **** how do we know you don't just add random people on there that you pull to wars then say oh look but we have them on a memberlist. We were not shown this memberlist when war was declared and you agreed to our rule of no editing memberlist 48 hours prior to the war.

[bear1108]

First, the war was in world 30. If we didnt hop then we would won without the war because you were not there.CASE IS CLOSED HERE.

There is also a leaving the center bounds from BC so we can talk about BC cheating but we dont. You were the ones who waited us at the portal spamming IQ cheated because of the ranger's numbers but you dont have proof.

 

Then, we had 5 rangers. Names: wdf tbed, I Croas I, Filo224, Vbalaska2222, Day9456.

 

 

Memberlists. We signed for twr with both of the memberlists.

InterQueo

InterQueo Junior and New members

 

 

I hope a moderator will have a look at these.

[HAR]

Looks dubious.

Gratz whoever.

[Skillercrush]

"You used plurar form, so we thinked that you knew about own zml."

 

Okay so your saying that because it says, Memberlists lock at 48 hours, that we meant plural? What if that was a spelling error my friend? Think about it, you say "plurar" and "thinked" as key vocabulary words. It's thought by the way. Memberlists is not even a word, if you type it using firefox, you get a nice pretty red squiggly line that mocks your vocab. I'm not saying that this "spelling error" was incidental. But when it says "Winning teams runehead" you post only one of them; The "real" runehead. How are we supposed to know if your cheating, when you don't even give us a link to the second runehead in the first place. Desperate we are to get a good pull ehh?

 

And don't EVEN talk about breaking bounds. I mean, I know that It is a capital offense, and everyone who does it should get the electric chair, but at that point in the war, everyone was like "wtfbbq?" and calling it quits. Note, I was not at the war, but looking at this evidence, I see hax.

 

1 Blitzcreed Member breaks bounds

1 Clan that uses two M.L.

24 Angry people expecting an honorable war.

Fighting the real war on Tip It? Priceless.

 

 

 

To whoever mods that look at this, I certainly hope that you can hopefully not dictate your decision on our indecisive looking (s) at the end of "Memberlist Lock".

[thetateman25]

memberlists in the plural could have also meant our memberlist and your memberlist your whole argument revolves around a single "s"

[bear1108]

1 Blitzcreed Member breaks bounds

1 Clan that uses two M.L.

24 Angry people expecting an honorable war.

Fighting the real war on Tip It? Priceless. -We fought in rs but you all logged.It's not our fault.

 

You forgot to add that you were in the wrong world and blamed us that we were not there and also that you called us cheaters because of the rangers but you have no proof as it is not true.

 

And if you were not at the war, you dont know how things happened just heard about it as you all believe it to happened so stop writing what you HEARD.

 

Anyway, the pic was the idea of our leader, I just posted.

[thetateman25]

everyone that has posted on this topic from bc was at the war.

[Sasake1350]

I said "Memberlists" as in my memberlist, and then your memberlist - Meaning plural, lol nice try though.

 

Could a mod please look this over...

 

And even if you did sign up with two memberlists, you should have at least told me before the war? Or atleast postedon the declaration topic that you signed up somewhere with TWO MEMBERLISTS. You pulled three members off of that list that no one knew about - three people is enough to make a huge difference in a war, and for all I know, you could have added them earlier that day? Since I had no idea that you had the memberlist I couldn't compare a screenie of it 48 hours before the war.

 

This whole thing is shady.

 

note: I WILL NOT, say that my clan won or would have won the war, but I know for a fact that IQ did not win that particular war because we pulled out due to their breaking of the ranger cap.

 

- If willing, to kind of end this pointless arguing, I'd rather just do a RM -

 

We take away the Range cap, make it range not allowed or range full out, either way, and allow them to use the second memberlist since I NOW have knowledge of it.

 

Mod's decision

[jupi234]

Hello!.

 

Bad to see you guys cant accept the lose :( . IQ dont broke the rule. At the start we waited BC in W30(war w). 2mins before war "Blitzcreed leader" named guy joined to own irc. He said:( no hello or something) You guys waited in w97. w97??? what the hell.... The war w was W30.. but okay we selected to w97. all of 2clan spamed hi bc-iq. BC leader challanged me, the war started. BC guys(only got 1 pic) leaved the bounds, we would say BC cheat, but we said? no... When BC guys saw they losed(15v8), they leaved the war and they started to spam "iq cheats". This was horrible to see they saying iq cheats for no reason.... They spamed they got pic for that we used 7+rangers.... They dont got it, but okay this think failed too.(we only used 5ranger what alowed the rule). Now they started to say we brought 2ml's... I think before you challange 1clan you check they homepage, you check members. I cant visualize you didnt know about second ml, you only looking reason for your lose. Who warred iq,mods everybody know we using 2ml in fullout wars(why not they are IQ members too). Bad too see that too, you saying we broke 48hours ml lock....(We only changed 1name, IQvivo challanged hes name to I_croas_i check the cc if you dont belive it) you have no reason to say that.... oh srry you got 1 "you didnt know about second ml"... But this is your fault you didnt checked the enemy clan composition.

 

I enjoyd the war this was very good war

 

I am srry for my bad english i hope everybody can uderstand it.

See you BC, and good luck next time(i hope without flame).

 

bye

[Skillercrush]

 

 

And if you were not at the war, you dont know how things happened just heard about it as you all believe it to happened so stop writing what you HEARD.

 

Alright bro, listen dude. General Zoso is my brother. We live in the same dang house for God's sake dude. And It's not what I heard, It's what I saw. I'm not making just random speculation this is sheer proof bro. I'm not here to argue about it, but before you come up in this humpty-bumpty insulting my intelligence, I'm just trying to express a point.

[Sasake1350]

There's been no flame, A Final KO leaders were also there and will vouch for us. However this is not the issue. You're playing a pity game in the post above, I'm looking at the hard proof.

 

- Waiting for a mods decision -

 

BTW, I do not think saying "IQ cheated" is flame ;) Just an FYI.

[Hojxs]

okay i just have two things to ask why didnt you post both ML links on the post and also it wasnt full out war it was only matched opts which means the only reason you pulled from the other ML was to gain an advantage that i think was unfair and also you had enough people to meet the 25 v 25 requirements with the ML you posted so there was no logical reason to use those people

 

next i was the one who went out of bounds and it was just slightly didnt give me an advantage i ran out then ran right back in bounds not hugging anyone giving you guys more hits on me which shortly after did infact kill me so it was entirely unintentional but yes it did happen i wont lie and i half did that cause i was busy talking to people who were pointing out that you had more rangers which we never got a pic of them because they would always switch back to full rune before we get the picture and we did kill several rangers which then another person would switch over to range to take their place rather than staying in rune