New Game Poll

[a_bert]

My proposal: Kingdoms Hegemony with Archi's moderation

 

I'm not much for RPing...

[archimage_a]

Random idea to expand Sere's idea:

 

Basically we have the daily play game, but then we also have a once a week update. The once a week update would take the whole world into focus and would advance the game by a month or so.

The person who did the update would be the next person on the opt in list(Since just a list of players might lead to one person not being interested and thus not updating the map, and such), in alphabetical order.

The person would be automatically right, regardless of what everyone else thinks. Since it is one week it can be undone the next week by whoever's turn it is.

 

It would just stimulate the feeling of uncertainty and unpredictability in the game world.

 

[hide]

 

What new, or old, nations will rise to meet the challenge of a now Post-Apocalyptic world? And what will they seek to gain, or abandon, in order to achieve it?

 

That, is for YOU to decide!

 

The rules are simple.

 

Players shall take turns in updating our little story.

 

With each turn, a player will both edit the map to show the current boundaries of each nation and give an accompanying list of events which transpired in the world during that time.

 

Additionally, during each turn, a player can either add a new nation to the map or disband an already existing nation.

 

Be sure, however, to refrain making changes that are too unrealistic, like making an extremely downtrodden nation that's the size of Rhode Island defeat a pan-Asian coalition all by itself.

 

Each turn is equivalent to a single game month and the map must be updated in Paint and uploaded as a PNG.

 

So, who wants to go first?[/hide]

[The_Mather1]

Or we could just wait for Civ5 or Settlers7 and play online there.

[archimage_a]

Except for those amongst us who can't afford to buy the new games(though personally CIv 5 is getting brought unless they manage to pull a C&C4 and completely wreck the game. )

[The_Mather1]

I never mentioned buying, although I shouldn't say more, risking a ban.

[Retech]

Random idea to expand Sere's idea:

 

Basically we have the daily play game, but then we also have a once a week update. The once a week update would take the whole world into focus and would advance the game by a month or so.

The person who did the update would be the next person on the opt in list(Since just a list of players might lead to one person not being interested and thus not updating the map, and such), in alphabetical order.

The person would be automatically right, regardless of what everyone else thinks. Since it is one week it can be undone the next week by whoever's turn it is.

 

It would just stimulate the feeling of uncertainty and unpredictability in the game world.

 

[hide]

 

What new, or old, nations will rise to meet the challenge of a now Post-Apocalyptic world? And what will they seek to gain, or abandon, in order to achieve it?

 

That, is for YOU to decide!

 

The rules are simple.

 

Players shall take turns in updating our little story.

 

With each turn, a player will both edit the map to show the current boundaries of each nation and give an accompanying list of events which transpired in the world during that time.

 

Additionally, during each turn, a player can either add a new nation to the map or disband an already existing nation.

 

Be sure, however, to refrain making changes that are too unrealistic, like making an extremely downtrodden nation that's the size of Rhode Island defeat a pan-Asian coalition all by itself.

 

Each turn is equivalent to a single game month and the map must be updated in Paint and uploaded as a PNG.

 

So, who wants to go first?[/hide]

 

That seems like a fun concept. Wouldn't want to be living near the Soviet-American border. :P

[archimage_a]

I never mentioned buying, although I shouldn't say more, risking a ban.

Hmmm, in todays world it seems unlikely to work, since almost everything has numerous safeguards against illegal purchase of goods.

[The_Mather1]

Yet it still isn't enough, let's just say my littlesister managed to download SPORE.

[archimage_a]

Spore is a ramshackled old game.

 

Increasingly you need to have a connection to the website which validates the key...The whole argument is academic though, since anyone who actually enjoys the game will buy it. Downloading games, while doubtlessly fun, doesn't help anyone, and just leads to games like Spore being developed, which has all the value of a glass of milk at a lactose intolerancy convention....and that is the only use is to injure others.

[Icuownage]

I could get a cracked SPORE easy, I can't get a SPORE for free that wont allow me all the cool updates and such though.

[archimage_a]

Shall we stay way from the stuff that I would have to ban people for?

[Icuownage]

Mmkay, on to the games.

 

So Sere's is basically Fallout 3? Controlling how many people?

 

Can't we have multiple ideas done?

[The_Mather1]

[spoiler='EDIT]It doesn't neccessarely have to be cracked, on my stationary computer I have a pre-activated windows 7 professional.

 

 

Ok, from now.

[The Dark Lord]

If anyone else has Halo: Combat Evolved for their PC, we can have a Tip.it-only Slayer match.

 

I just need to figure out how to get GameSpy to work in order to access a Halo match over the internet. Would be pretty fun.

[The_Mather1]

I've got Halo demo. I think it's from combat evolved. But then it'll have to be on the Blood Gulch map.

[The Dark Lord]

I've got Halo demo. I think it's from combat evolved. But then it'll have to be on the Blood Gulch map.

 

 

Forgot about Demo! Yeah, we can have a Tip.it-only Halo match sometime. We would have to organize it, though.

 

Now that I think about it, my school has the Demo on every computer in a certain computer lab. We were playing Halo in there yesterday. :P

 

If anyone is good at modding the game, let's have a match on Blood Gulch where there are Scorpion tanks and Banshees. :thumbup:

[Nexaduro]

I think we need a game that plays more on the individual level, with a more structured setting than Dungeoneering.

 

EDIT: That's essentially what I'm trying to do. Also, Post-Apocalyptic setting rules.

[archimage_a]

What do you mean?

[jasignhagj]

I'd be down for a civilization style game

[VEGHATERMEATLOVER]

How about a game where you try to gain control of africa? You could sway NPC's into becoming followers of you through fear or simply bieng a good person and then you should battle it out to be the leader of a country.

And we should have stats for our leader so we can have one on one battles just like the arena but ultimately the one with the better stats will win.