There are no predators capable of killing Norwegians either...Yet Sweden doesn't go around keeping the population down.

We've got bears, and mother elks are nigh unstopable when charging. Also with the current growth rate it would take centuries to fill the nation, while it would take only a few years until overpopulation would cause wildlife to starve.

Why wait for nature to kill the animals when we can do it?

Except natural selection, obviously...

Why let many animals suffer when we can eat a few?

Reiteration: Natural Selection.

 

People who think suffering is the be all and end all of existance tend to be the same people cramming themselves with drugs to take away the pain caused by the other drugs they are taking and the toxins in the air.

 

I think it is terribly ironic...although amazingly short sighted and self destructive.

 

 

And eating is an acceptable reason to kill an animal...Keeping the population down...no.

 

Problems hunting?

 

Here's your answer.

 

The X-Class hunting rifle, proven to obliterate small furry creatures and absolutely annhilate larger more agressive creatures.

 

Bear chasing you, X-Class

Small rat in your house, X-Class

Possible alliance between racoon and badger, mother [bleep]ing X-Class.

 

Hi I'm ICU, from the X-Class corp, and I have to say that I've never seen a better gun, I shot through 5 bears, yes, 5 bears lined up. Not only that, it was able to cut down the tree behind it.

 

Chuck Norris uses this gun.

Arch, it's our responsibility to keep the population down since the farmers killed all our wolves and most of our bears.

Arch, it's our responsibility to keep the population down since the farmers killed all our wolves and most of our bears.

Violence is an instrument entirely inefficient toward redressing wrong; and multiplies, instead of indemnifying losses.

 

 

Indiscriminate killing of animals is NOT a good replacement.

We hunt what is beccessary in order to protect the animals endangered by the thoughtless farmers protecting their sheep. Also you're the one to talk, hasn't fox hunt been a part british culture for hundreds of years?

 

Me and Ross know who this is.

[hide]Seras Victoria from the Hellsing TV show (blue uniform not yellow/red or black and white)[/hide]

 

Archi, culling is sometimes needed, did you hear David Camerons view on human rights? He basically encourages you to 'defend' your house by taking away human rights.

 

Mather, killing animals is one of the signs of a future murderer.... But if they come to your house and are a danger you can kill them. Also fox hunting is bloody appaling, only the RICH FACIST conservatives want to relegalise it.

 

 

Is anybody going to work on the sticky?

Indeed, though we have the excuse of being traditionalist idiots, you are trying to justify hunting as ethical....

 

 

Its sort of like a dictator that invades a country to set up a dictatorship because another country set up a democracy and someone killed all the elected officals.

It stops the short term problems, but the long term damage is far greater.

The sacrifice of a few is neccessary to ensure the continued existance of the genus as a whole.

The swift death of individual is better than the starvation of the species.

Once interaction with nature is made it must be continued until balance is restored.

They would've been killed anyways if not for those damn farmers.

 

Choose whichever you prefer, but you can't deny that letting al the wildlife in Norway suffer instead of killing a few bucks is morally wrong.

 

And it is indeed a short term fix, we're already trying to introduce some Swedish wolves into the Norwegian fauna.

The sacrifice of a few is neccessary to ensure the continued existance of the genus as a whole.

The swift death of individual is better than the starvation of the species.

Once interaction with nature is made it must be continued until balance is restored.

They would've been killed anyways if not for those damn farmers.

The first is true. However randomly killing members of the Genus with a gun does not protect it, since the evolutionary development of bulletproof skin is unlikely.

The entire species would not starve...the basic premise of natural selection.

A glass, once broken by a hammer, cannot be fixed by hitting it again.

Natural selection isn't, if you kill 10% of the population the other 90% are better....

 

Choose whichever you prefer, but you can't deny that letting al the wildlife in Norway suffer instead of killing a few bucks is morally wrong.

Instead you are letting all the wildlife in Norway develop without the guiding hand of natural selection...the guiding hand which has created the human race...without the hand we are able to mutate viruses...not even create them, just mutate them.

The farmers broke the glass, we are clamping the hose until we've got anyther one.

 

If we were not to hunt then three things could happen:

A they become carnivores.

B first plants die, then they die

C plants develop poison, the animals die

....FOR THE LOVE OF GOD AMERICA, INTRODUCE SOME GUN LAWS! CHILDREN SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED FLAMETHROWERS!

 

This post is not all in capitals, the part that is supposed to convey outrage.

He made it himself, I don't think anyone here sells them.

 

And wh0o has the flamethrower? I thought it was the chainsawer who had the oddest aresenal.

Jamie does. Showed me a video of it. And do you mean Tori?

 

I think one of us has a rocket launcher, and we had those scince middle school.

That too, is Jamie. He's the master of DIY weaponry, most of his designs he either made himself or enhanced.

 

But that's nothing. One of my classmates has the power to kill squirrels just by looking at them. :rolleyes:

The farmers broke the glass, we are clamping the hose until we've got anyther one.

 

If we were not to hunt then three things could happen:

A they become carnivores.

B first plants die, then they die

C plants develop poison, the animals die

 

Which is causing feedback, destroying the hose.

 

A: Yes...They could evolve into Carnivores...instantly. Do you understand how evolution works?

B: Which is why plants have these things call seeds, which are evolved to grow after being digested...So there will always be plants, which mean the few animals that survived will have food...Natural selection 101.

C: Natural Selection, the animals that don't eat the poison plants or the animals with natural resistences survive.

I have the power to kill silence just by looking straight ahead.

 

I'm talking decades.

But yes, the situation is that critical that the possibility of all edible plants dying is existant.

 

You really don't understand the consequences of not trying to repair or at least halt the damage done to nature, just look at Australia, a whole species of monsters extinct, dromedaries ransacking houses like pests and poisonus frogs roaming around.

I have the power to frustrate people logically and simply...

But often your logic is wrong.

I have the power to damage myself by doing anything with any object.

Often my logic is accurate, which people see as wrong, since it does not conform to their world view.

Its not right of me to say your logic is wrong.

Often your logic does not conform with the laws of physics or human behaviour.

 

But yes, its the world view that determines whether something is right or wrong.

I make no comment on human behaviour, it is a subjective field, though I respect the laws of physics...and I am yet to see somewhere that I have ignored them?

I have the power to remain stable even though I'm slightly insane.

I have the power to maintain my sanity around morons.

 

Oh, and I can take stuff apart with my mind. As in theorize how it works without taking it the hell apart.

 

One of these days, I'm actually going to build something...