im hearing a lot of people saying that elite void is great for bossing like, qbd,kbd,kq, kk and even corp and doing slayer tasks but is it really worth it? and if so is it better than war priest?

void is better than warpriest. If you need the extra defense you should be using normal armor, not hybrid. Void is used for its offensive bonuses.

so its good in a way for lower bosses like I listed ?

I don't think you're going to be able to do any of those bosses well in void, save kbd and kq. Kbd because he's a whimp, kq because her attacks ignore defence anyway. For QBD, stick with Bandos or Torva, for KK also, for corp stick with Tetsu (if soloing) or also Bandos/Torva.

I don't think you're going to be able to do any of those bosses well in void, save kbd and kq. Kbd because he's a whimp, kq because her attacks ignore defence anyway. For QBD, stick with Bandos or Torva, for KK also, for corp stick with Tetsu (if soloing) or also Bandos/Torva.

lol so in other words void isn't that good then eh :P

also warpriest is horrible. I dont think there is any situations it should be used in.

also warpriest is horrible. I dont think there is any situations it should be used in.

Tormented demons.

Granted, damage-boosting gear would increase your damage, but warpriest allows you to change attack styles quicker + lets you carry more supplies since you don't have to keep more equipment on you.

 

also warpriest is horrible. I dont think there is any situations it should be used in.

Tormented demons.

Granted, damage-boosting gear would increase your damage, but warpriest allows you to change attack styles quicker + lets you carry more supplies since you don't have to keep more equipment on you.

 

convenience doesn't mean it should be used. Switching is really easy with the action bar and you'll save more supplies by using better armor then the invent spaces saved.

How does void stack up post-EoC compared to the offensive armors, like bandos and torva? (Sorry if i'm thread-jacking).

lol nah its fine, its helping me a lot :)

I believe that the damage boost itself was almost as good as nex armors, not including the accuracy boost. 

 

You can still use void at QBD but it's definitely not comfortable and a lot more common to get combo'd on phase 4 when souls spawn and she decides to superbreath immediately after. 

 

It works fine at KBD for sure, because anything works good on KBD as long as you have antifire protection. 

 

KQ you can do in anything as long as you have 2 styles and max offense.

 

KK you can do in void as well as long as the team you go in is ok with it and you're dpsing. 

 

 

It will not serve you well at ANY of the GWD bosses. And for training you should be using a full slayer helm and doing slayer. Personally I got void before EoC and now that I lost a piece due to a glitch (which I reported) I don't plan on getting it back. If you don't have it already you're much better served with t7 GWD armor and ignore warpriest all together unless you're doing TDs and are lazy/want slower kills.

I was thinking mainly for slayer, so I don't have to switch armors just weapons O_o will that work?

Void's no good for slayer of course, war-priest is okay, but GWD armours are better.

Assuming Void is a flat 10% damage increase, under most circumstances the damage alone from void will beat any power armor, unless the tier of your armor is higher than your weapon, which then it will be roughly the same for 10 tiers of difference, lower if more than 20 tiers.

 

EG Void will be better for damage if you use Royal crossbow than using Pernix, but if you have dual karil's, pernix will be roughly the same as void, while Sirenic will be better, damagewise.

I think void is 10% accuracy and 5% damage (wiki claims this).