May 20, 200620 yr TOMS BACK. The CD comes out on May 23rd, whos getting it? I am!! Good day sir, how may I help you?Id like to access my bank account please.Certainly sir.
May 20, 200620 yr lol theyre sadly bad theyre all depressed really thought tom would do better obviously not Currently playing... WoW - C:SSTaking a huge break from rs.http://www.wowarmory.com/character-shee ... ar&n=Nelaz
May 20, 200620 yr Blink 182 were bad enough. It's ridiculously annoying when a new band are successful purely because of its members' former success. Angels & Airwaves play Blink 182 songs, because they can't make it otherwise. Pop music is a terrible thing.
May 22, 200620 yr TOMS BACK. The CD comes out on May 23rd, whos getting it? I am!! It came out today here and it's a major disappointment. I woulda much preferred a new Blink 182 CD, I supose everyone would, but meh. Blink 182 were bad enough. It's ridiculously annoying when a new band are successful purely because of its members' former success. Angels & Airwaves play Blink 182 songs, because they can't make it otherwise. Pop music is a terrible thing. Haha.
May 23, 200620 yr Blink 182 were bad enough. It's ridiculously annoying when a new band are successful purely because of its members' former success. Angels & Airwaves play Blink 182 songs, because they can't make it otherwise. Pop music is a terrible thing. No, you seriously don't know what you are going on about. A&A sound nothing like Blink 182, especially compared to Blink's earlier stuff, which is why I don't really like them. Speaking of which, what happened to Blink? Have they officially split?
May 25, 200620 yr Blink 182 were bad enough. It's ridiculously annoying when a new band are successful purely because of its members' former success. Angels & Airwaves play Blink 182 songs, because they can't make it otherwise. Pop music is a terrible thing. No, you seriously don't know what you are going on about. A&A sound nothing like Blink 182, especially compared to Blink's earlier stuff, which is why I don't really like them. Speaking of which, what happened to Blink? Have they officially split? I never said they sound like Blink 182. They actually play Blink 182 covers, live. It's awful.
May 26, 200620 yr Why you guys dissing Blink182, i think they are good :). A&A are not that great i think. I believe songs kinda bland, unlike Blink182. MY opinion based on 3 songs i have heard from them. Visit my DeviantArt Page at http://vladmoney.deviantart.com
May 26, 200620 yr Theyre a watered down version of blink 182, however my other half loves them so i cannot complain. Ah well, id rather have the old blink than this new crap everyones talking about. Mmm now to avoid a few slaps from the other half.
May 28, 200620 yr A&A are a very good band, I'd recommend the album to anyone... You can't make the comparison of them to Blink 182 because they are two seperate bands.. two seperate sounds...Tom may be the lead singer but they sound nothing alike
May 31, 200620 yr They just don't sound unique enough. I dislike them. The lead singer is from Blink 182 and their songs sound the same making for a confusing style. Its just not the same as starting a new band. Its a cool name and they sound like they would be a good band because of their label. But they sound like they are from the 90's and not up to date. They should stop trying to compete.
May 31, 200620 yr They just don't sound unique enough. I dislike them. The lead singer is from Blink 182 and their songs sound the same making for a confusing style. Its just not the same as starting a new band. Its a cool name and they sound like they would be a good band because of their label. But they sound like they are from the 90's and not up to date. They should stop trying to compete. So what your saying is bands from the 90s and before are bad because they aren't modernized?
May 31, 200620 yr They just don't sound unique enough. I dislike them. The lead singer is from Blink 182 and their songs sound the same making for a confusing style. Its just not the same as starting a new band. Its a cool name and they sound like they would be a good band because of their label. But they sound like they are from the 90's and not up to date. They should stop trying to compete. So what your saying is bands from the 90s and before are bad because they aren't modernized? Nice try but no, This bands sounds like they are from the past. Which they aren't. They don't have a new sound.
Create an account or sign in to comment