Atticux

Comparing online 'buds' is sad to be honest. You were who first made the reference to "online" buddies. I merely responded Nope I wasn't, go back. Anyway, watch the mods only ban me and emerixa.. funnily enough. :lol:

Comparing online 'buds' is sad to be honest.

Which I already said many times.. yet I guess cos it's you (who has over 7000 posts?) who said it, it'll get respected more? Pathetic. You really seem to me like a very self centered person, but i guess i can't judge because i haven't actually talked to you. But, like apinagez said earlier, i think we should all just start ignoring you...and your best bud that comes to defend you. Oh and also, is all you ever do argue? Every time i see a post of yours, well, first of all i'm annoyed at the site of your name, then i see that yes, it's just another argument. Brought to the forum by Atticux, everybody! If you'd just leave, maybe we could actually have a discussion based on the name of the thread, and not the message you posted. Noo! Well, at least dont ignore him at this thread... We wouldnt have anymore silly argumentation, no more Atticux getting owned and owned, no more Atticux asking for a buddy to help him... Who doesnt get annyoed when reads a post by him? It would be nice to get back to the original thread, but there wouldnt be anymore Atticux owning... :sad: ~komodo See.. how many 'buds' do you lot have? Exactly... I can see that you either didn't read my posts or you just ignored it and joined everyone else in 'owning' me.. go back and read.

Exactly, now if I was a mod I woulda deleted this months ago when people started personally attacking me and claiming I was flaming when I was so clearly on topic. Just delete it someone, before these 'hardcore posters' think they've owned me again and again..

That means my post on telling people to stop arguing and do it in PM should be respected... exactly. To be honest, and you can deny it all you like, I need one considering you're all each others [wagon]' and will stick up for each other on anything even tho you're so blatently wrong, oh well.

Their petti version of owned, yeah. My version of 'owned', nah. Omg\z mypurplecrayon st0p flAMingz emerixa.

Which I already said many times.. yet I guess cos it's you (who has over 7000 posts?) who said it, it'll get respected more? Pathetic.

Yeah, Black Mages are an amazing band. Recording some covers wouldn't be too hard, but playing em live.. not so sure about. If you attempt it tho, record so we can all hear.

It came out today here and it's a major disappointment. I woulda much preferred a new Blink 182 CD, I supose everyone would, but meh. Haha.

Nice, I like it.

I guess in a way they are, but it's just hard to think about considering how much they suck. That's cos most pop-punk sucks, and they're all influenced by Green Day.. thus making any pop-punk band of modern times suck. It's all been done before.

I'm fond of both genres, but i'd have to say you are waaaaaay off there. Compare a ska guitarist with someone like Dimebag, Zakk Wylde, Kirk Hammet. Those aren't even the best guitarists in the genre and they piss all over any ska guitarist out there. Same can be said for bassists, any metal bassist will be playing at 4 times the speed and technicality of a ska guy. Agreed, ska is just powerchords with brass instruments.

Maybe you don't like to admit it cos you hate the band or they've 'sold out' nowdays but they define(d) pop-punk. If you're gonna disagree, at least hold a decent arguement on it..

Yep exactly, people who don't like a band name em emo. I mean seriously, Green Day the pop punk legends are emo? How do you work that out.

He said straight out emo, not 50% emo.