Zierro

Which is what many many RSers' long term aspirations are. In terms of purely training combat as fast or profitable as possible, there are better methods. In terms of the "best" way to train combat, that's completely up to the individual.

Yeah, about damn time. It is funny though. This was just an average thread about average noobs doing annoying things and then it spiraled into "OMG y do u care so much that u r going to make a hole entire RANT about it? im gonna keep askin and askin y u care even tho u already answer bcuz i care even moar!". Then I came along to suffocate the flames with a sheet of crust.

I had a great New Year. I got really [bleep]ed up and made no resolutions.

:thumbup: And to think I used to be the one complaining about the family-get-together's. Now it depresses me when the holidays are over.

Looking good. By far the sexiest one to post in this thread.

I hope your not on RS while posting this. But seriously the lawful good, the self righteous rule abiders annoy me to no end. Its a D&D term but this picture demonstrates all the different player archetypes. I really enjoy the fact that most of these player types are on this forum I reported your post because it contained profanity. Enjoy your ban. I lol'd at your post because it contained hilarity. Enjoy the game. You lost the game. ...The game has been over for a while. -.- PS: Yeah, Chaotic Good sums me up pretty well.

That is equating the existence of some intentionally ridiculous concept you just randomly thought of to the existence of god, the thing being debated and the thing that is beyond human comprehension by definition. The only thing that test told us was that you beat a bunch of odds. The probability is admittedly phenomenal (about 1/3,000,000), but not impossible. You merely assigned a certain truth to the outcome of your roll: If it rolls X, Y is true. What if someone were to beat even more odds than you (which has been done tons of times) and assigned the fact that god does not exist to the results? How would you feel about their conclusion? Also, I fail to see how that is any more humble than Pascal's Wager. Aside from that faulty method of deciphering truths, I pretty much agree with your depiction of god.

My point has been proven. People would rather insert universally applicable desperate rebuttals with no substance that are on par with "ur gay" than actually try to bring up a valid point because they know they have none.

Yet you feel the need to make another post, even though it doesn't bring up anything new and is probably only for the sole purpose of getting in that last word. Now that's what I call desperate. /thread

Not really, but hey at least now we all know how desperate you are. Especially with you trying to spin this around on me. "It was far from a joke, and now you're the one defending." Can't stand the spotlight, huh? lol 1. It was a joke. But not anymore, since you've went out of your way to prove my point for me. 2. I'm not defending. I acknowledge that I am desperate.

I will let you in on a little secret. It is a trap card to see who is going to feel the need to desperately defend themselves against being called desperate. It starts off as a joke (with me saying "my logic is the best" and "you're all just scared" that should be a dead giveaway) and it ends as an actual legitimate point. From what I've gathered, it seems to be pretty effective.

I think the problem here lies in your inability to conceive of the idea of "desperate" since you are sensitive and it is nothing out of the norm for you. Firstly, you did feel the need to respond to my point about how he just wants to get the last word with nothing more than literally "last word" for the sole purpose of loosening tensions and poking fun around. I returned the favor and made a bad joke back, but you decided to take offense to it and defend yourself vigorously, even calling me a [bleep], which implies a great deal of desperation. I was only joking around when I first said it, but now you've taken the liberty of proving my claim. So yes, I think it would be quite fair to say the manner in which you are posting could be reasonably considered desperate, especially now that you are being so defensive. Oh and here's prime example of desperation, for those of you who are also having trouble with deciphering what it means:

You didn't do anything? My goodness, your memory is terrible. Luckily for you, I am here to help you out. This might ring a bell: There is just such a desperate tone to that post. Sorry to be such an honest [bleep].

Well, it was meant as a joke. But since you decided to take it offensively, even better. :thumbup: There was something to counter for me there, by the way - you made a stupid joke directed at what I just said, so I decided to joke back and point out how it was a desperate response. Now you are desperately trying to defend yourself by calling me a big bad meanie and actually proving my point. Owned. I already do. ;)

Since the rebuttals were even more desperate than I've estimated, I think it has been concluded that my logic is the best and people are too scared to argue back. Why insult me? I never argued with you, I was just trying to be funny... Try to NOT be a [bleep] to people when they didn't do anything against you. How was it any more insulting than what you said? You tried being a smartass, I countered, and then you turn around and cry when someone makes a joke directed at you. Try NOT to be so sensitive. I said that a moral nihilist would not think there is anything morally wrong about raping. That's okay though. I enjoy watching how badly you can misconstrue what I say. It's as if you just see someone's name that's arguing with you, and you automatically just make up some universally applicable reply to mask the fact that you aren't good at reading and cannot form a proper response. Prime examples: "y not ignar" "take your personal vendetta elsewhere". So please, for the love of god, go and actually watch Pulp Fiction, you noob. I care about how much other people care.

Since the rebuttals were even more desperate than I've estimated, I think it has been concluded that my logic is the best and people are too scared to argue back.

Since I got my 360, I've been playing Halo 3 and MW2 on LIVE. I've been kicking major ass on Social Slayer, but haven't been doing that great on MW2. I still need to get used to the fact that there are air strikes and [cabbage].

What so we're already done here? :( I was being sarcastic when I said "/thread". That's the beauty behind this thread. People really seem to care about you caring, even though you stopped caring weeks ago. That didn't stop anyone though. As long as they get the last word in by saying "Y NOT IGNAR" (even though that has never been the issue, as I've pointed out several times), they will think they are the witty voice of Rants and that the anonymous world will esteem them to higher regards +1. I know how this distorted line of reasoning functions. I await your desperate rebuttals. Let's see how much you guys care about this issue. Go thread go!

Virtual sadism.

The new 360 and a bunch of Malcolm in the Middle-esque clothing.

I had some eggnog with rum last night and I thought it was pretty good. :thumbup: I think I'll have some more.

No, my belief is that, while you are completely free to bother him, it is also pretty funny, maybe even ironic, for a Runescaper to care about how another player is playing Runescape so much (perhaps even implying that it's serious business or something). I mean you're already wasting time just by logging in. But hey, if you want to spend your precious time figuring out why someone is doing a certain task in a roleplaying game on the internet, THEN TO EACH HIS OWN I GUESS. I am free to find the humor in that, is all. /now thread

Wtf bro? If anything I was nudging about half a dozen people to continue debating in this thread because I find it enjoyable. There are no losers. Only learners and winners.

Portal 2

Admittedly, it would suck very much to lose something you've invested tons of time and energy into. But to kill yourself or become emotionally unstable after the fact is still ridiculous. It just doesn't make sense to me. Why ruin your entire future just because your past got ruined? I guess it would be necessary for me to add that I think 99.99% of suicides are completely unwarranted though.