The_Gabe

People who complain about bronies.

no

Yes.

Homecoming club escorts and sweethearts. I'm the guy walking.

63K Summoning xp..? I'm guessing charms.

That said, I noticed no noticeable difference between the girls in HS and in college. This. Though, I came from a private Catholic high school, so girls are way more... DTF in college than what I'm used to. Makes it much harder for me, tbh. DTF?

I've had mine for almost four years and the battery life is still great. I rarely carry it around, though, but I often listen to music at night. I see Tiigon has snuck into my head and posted my thoughts.

The death penalty is ethically wrong, simply because it is a manifestation of revenge in its most barbaric form, and it is contrary to the (to my mind) irrefutable principle that revenge is petty and best avoided at all times. But hey, politics and morality aren't really connected anyway. Ethics change over time. Besides, who is the one to set ethics anyways? If we're going to go into meta-ethics, I am a firm moral realist, and as such I do not believe your first sentence at all. Second, I think it is the job of the state to have an ethical basis, much in the same way a political party has (allegedly) an ideology, because ultimately a closer link between philosophy and politics would be very beneficial for the latter and, in some senses, the former. Ethics don't have anything to do with being a realist. Ethics are learned. You are not born with them. How exactly would you have an ethical basis if people differentiate in the meaning of the word. If you do that, you're basically telling people they are wrong/incorrect in their beliefs. Pretty sure that would be a violation of the 1st Amendment. I believe moral realism, as a meta-ethical concept, is perfectly sound. As such, I do believe that man is born with a degree of ethical grounding. I cannot recall any society that has thought it acceptable to murder, and the only individuals that are are deemed by society as psychopathic. This is one example of telling people what to believe, and I see no reason not to do so more often (even if it violates the US constitution, which here in the UK holds no sway). But the reasons for killing people changed throughout history. If that's not ethics, I don't know what is.

No [cabbage] you'd get killed. What did you think?

I don't know how people can like having metal on their face.

Not being judgemental, superficial, and stupid.

All ways.

All ways.

My dog almost killed a cat today and we're probably going to have to pay the vet costs. Your life is not as bad as it seems. TBH it looks like average so please, instead of looking at all the bad things, start posting some positive things. They don't have to be something big, but quit being so damn negative.

Strong chains. I'm not sure how strong, but they were strong. And Nom, we've had this dog for like 7 years. Training him further now is pointless.

It's broken chains many times before.

Please tell me college girls are better than high school girls.

I'd love to hit that.

German Shepherd. Yeah ... put a muzzle on the dog if it's got aggression issues like that. German Shepherds are awesome, nonetheless. :thumbup: It ran away, so I couldn't. I do if I take him on walks.

German Shepherd.

When my dog gets loose and attacks cats. He's already killed 2 cats before and took a bite out of one that managed to get away because I basically strangled my dog. We and the owners don't know where the cat currently is and how hurt it is, but my dog's mouth was full of blood. This day is going from bad to worse.

Early Runescape memories. again?

The death penalty is ethically wrong, simply because it is a manifestation of revenge in its most barbaric form, and it is contrary to the (to my mind) irrefutable principle that revenge is petty and best avoided at all times. But hey, politics and morality aren't really connected anyway. Ethics change over time. Besides, who is the one to set ethics anyways? If we're going to go into meta-ethics, I am a firm moral realist, and as such I do not believe your first sentence at all. Second, I think it is the job of the state to have an ethical basis, much in the same way a political party has (allegedly) an ideology, because ultimately a closer link between philosophy and politics would be very beneficial for the latter and, in some senses, the former. Ethics don't have anything to do with being a realist. Ethics are learned. You are not born with them. How exactly would you have an ethical basis if people differentiate in the meaning of the word. If you do that, you're basically telling people they are wrong/incorrect in their beliefs. Pretty sure that would be a violation of the 1st Amendment.

The death penalty is ethically wrong, simply because it is a manifestation of revenge in its most barbaric form, and it is contrary to the (to my mind) irrefutable principle that revenge is petty and best avoided at all times. But hey, politics and morality aren't really connected anyway. Ethics change over time. Besides, who is the one to set ethics anyways?

When the girl that you're supposed to go to with to homecoming tells you yes and then the next day tells you she doesn't remember where we met and she has plans with her friends. Women I tell ye. I sure hope college girls are better...