Bloodstain

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40491489/ns/us_news-wikileaks_in_security/ [bleep]. Yes. Its going to be interesting I think No it's not And ugh, that video posted like two posts up. Of course he's going for publicity, the only way the leaks are going to get any coverage is by hyping them up and making people actually excited for them

Lol you give too much credit to the American population

You could be a police diver! :P Hahaha, in a landlocked city where the waters are frozen a good chunk of the year kills that. Good idea though :razz: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Proenneke He brought a video camera with him Wish I had the skill set for that sort of thing

Like issuing a media black out on the outcome of the Gulf Oil spill! The burning of skin, passing out, bleeding throats, peeling skin, busting red blood cells leading to bleeding out of holes in the body that shouldn't bleed, and pushing liability of tainted fish on the fishermen! e: Also lol at America criticizing Mexico on the "war on drugs" and double lol e: Germany suspects USA putting Afghan funds from allies in to the US Treasury http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/02/germany-us-afghan-funds-wikileaks

Police officer, will be graduating next year with a Criminal Justice degree and then going for the city police or RCMP. Dream job would be scuba diving or filming cool documentaries about animals or ancient places. Just generally exploring new places

And now, a word from JFK http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhZk8ronces&feature=player_embedded#!

Some more interesting leaks from today for those who don't actually follow it: http://motherjones.com/politics/2010/12/wikileaks-cable-obama-quashed-torture-investigation http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/blog/2010/dec/02/wikileaks-us-embassy-cables-live-updates ^^^^ THAT LINK HAS LIVE UPDATES! Use it if you're looking for updates. ^ Better than I've been putting it

I don't know, maybe that's a good reason why they don't make this information public? I'm guessing that that is for the bit about the KGB and the party, but I don't know. http://cablegate.wikileaks.org/cable/2010/02/10MADRID154.html e: weren't some cables related to Canada supposed to be released today? I'm interested in those

Also from some more leaks today http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/n.php?n=prosecutor-says-russia-a-virtual-mafia-state-2010-12-02

You know that the government releases records of things periodically? Knowing why something happened three years ago doesn't change the current situation, but can definitely make it worse. What wikileaks is accomplishing for us is tightening down current information policy for the US, making it more difficult in the future for important leaks to happen. Government releases what they want to be released. Do you think they'd ever release that they were missile striking Yemen, or funding groups designated as terrorist groups by the US defense department? Maybe instead of looking at this as omg he just revealed US secrets, you should be looking at it as an opportunity to stop some of the things from happening in the future. Do you think it's ok for the government to do the aforementioned things unchallenged? Especially while taking on the unofficial position of world police? Governments should be carrying out the wills of the population they represent, pretty sure killing civilians and aiding terrorists is counter to that. By NOT leaking this stuff, you would be allowing the government to continue with the shady actions and killing civilians

Haha "The government is always right and can do no wrong." We should just let them go around doing whatever they want, killing civilians in Yemen and making the Yemeni government take responsibility, clearly this information should be kept a secret! e: Someone hasn't actually read the leaks

Also, I'd like to point out that wikileaks TRIED to get the US to help them identify where it would be good to take out names that would supposedly put people at risk. The US didn't seem to think it was important enough http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2010/11/wikileaks-and-state-department-correspondence/

The Iraq documents were released months ago and no harm came to them. Harmful stuff was removed when the documents went to newspapers, but the wikileaks website has the unedited ones.

Post 78. If you don't want to look for it, this link was there http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503543_162-20011886-503543.html My point still stands. No one has been harmed because of the leak, informants names and info have been revealed, but no one has actually been harmed

As said before, the gov't has confirmed that no deaths or harm has come to anyone because of the Iraq leak. The leaks are trying to STOP the government from killing innocent people. Assange didn't put the people in the situation (informants, war crimes, etc), he's just making available what already should have been available Like I said before: gov't: "Wikilieaks might theoretically have blood on their hands in a hypothetical situation that has not actually happened" said a government spokesman from behind a podium made of blood in a castle made of blood atop a mountain made of blood. Alternately: "*invades iraq for no reason* The blood is on your hands wikileaks! "

1. There's been more useful information than what ambassadors think of other politicians 2. 291 out of 251, 287 documents have been leaked so far. Wait until we get the juicier stuff to write them off. Apparently they were important enough for the US to brief countries and withdraw ambassadors

You didn't even know who Assange was. LOL endangering lives. *America invades middle east or bombs Yemen* THIS IS ON YOUR HANDS WIKILEAKS!

itt 9/11 conspiracy theories rip original topic

A US gov't spokesperson admitted that no informants were killed/agents compromised by the last leak, so there's that. And they do have public benefit, especially considering they've released 278 out of 251, 287 documents so far. I'm interested to see what they have from the 60's-80's Also there are lots of beneficial things in the leaks, my favorite is that USA has secretly been air striking Yemen, with the Yemeni gov't taking the blame. Wonder why there were bomb packages sent from Yemen! They must hate America and it's freedom of course

Next leak: American big bank http://blogs.forbes.com/andygreenberg/2010/11/29/wikileaks-julian-assange-wants-to-spill-your-corporate-secrets/?boxes=Homepagelighttop Also, China is open to a re-unified Korea http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/nov/29/wikileaks-cables-china-reunified-korea

the leak so far http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/11/29/wikileaks_roundup/index.html

Assange is planning to release documents about Russia. He got balls man http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/2010/11/06/2010-11-06_wikileaks_founder_julian_assange_seeking_asylum_in_switzerland_over_fears_for_hi.html

I don't know how you can see a post that has at least 3 different conspiracy theories in it that are widely and openly known to be mocked on the internet as a serious post

I'm not usually one for open mockery, but this is just too easy. :rolleyes: Are YOU serious? People in this thread really need to look up what treason means. gov't: "Wikilieaks might theoretically have blood on their hands in a hypothetical situation that has not actually happened" said a government spokesman from behind a podium made of blood in a castle made of blood atop a mountain made of blood. Alternately: "*invades iraq for no reason* The blood is on your hands wikileaks! " Also, as far as I've read there hasn't even been any deaths caused by any of the last releases either. e: can a mod take care of michel's blatant trolling and Mask's gullibility?

wrong thread