Void is better. No. Armadyl has better stats, obviously. Let's compare the 2: Void armour: Attack: No bonus! Defence values: +45, + 30, +4 (full set: +79 for every stat). Armadul armour: Attack: +10, +33, +20 for ranged, full set: Defence values: -Hat: +6, +8, +10, +10, +8 -Chest: +56, +48, +61, +70, + 57 -Skirt/Legs: +32, +26, +34, +40, +33 No need to add, it beats void. Period. :twisted: There's your proof. http://www.tip.it/runescape/index.php?p ... _guide.htm LMAO you guys fail, hard. jsut because it said so on tip.it dosnt mean anything, that is the writers opinion, and yes arma is better at ARMA but NOT for training, void is wy better for trainning becaue it also has a set effect, with void you will hit 10% higher and 10% more accurete Notice how all the ppl i this thread that have 90+ range know void is better? and the 80- rangers thing arma is better?