Lenin64

Remember, I've got a flamethrower. :D

Well, any defence will be useless once it's been destroyed. So that's not really a valid argument. Pitfalls are more viable an option than a field of bear traps, that's for sure.

Last night I had this weird dream about a live TF2 tournament, or something. It was on Goldrush, 1st stage. I wa sa red spy, but I kept running back into the spectator stands (sort of near where the attic is, but behind) and I met this girl, and then below it all was a big sewer-like vault, and Newman from Seinfeld was in there. I don't remember all the details, but he tried to kill me, and then I left, played a little (none of my backstabs would register for some reason), then eventually I was back in the sewer vault, and Newman had dogs. Three, one was huge, possibly a pit bull, chained just out of reach and seeking to tear me apart if I went closer. Two others closer to Newman. I somehow got down to him (I entered above him, with a ladder to lead down to the watered area). I at least tried to kill him; again, my backstabs weren't registering, he body slammed me beneath the water and held me there while I kept trying to backstab him, eventually he died. My stabs migh have failed because I think I wasn't using the TF2 spy knife, but my own balisong, which is just a trainer and therefore is unsharpenable. The I was leaping across the second floor back decks of my neighbors, parkour-style, making one pretty awesome leap. I don't remember anything else, except going through and getting down and fearing my one uptight neighbor would catch me in his yard or on his deck.

Hey, he used to be the "appease everyone" guy. This is at least more fun to watch.

If we're looking at zombies with bodily decay, then depending on how long it's been a zombie the bear trap ould simply sever the foot and the zombie would keep coming. Crawling at this point, but still a mild threat. And then the trap is wasted unless we have people out there resetting them. If they're fully healthy zombies, a bear trap would indeed trap them.

There would be no expression. Just kill it, no fancy tricks. Spoken by someone who has never scalped a zombie. You're our suicider then? Depends, do suiciders get to scalp things? More like, "thing". Singular. Because by the time you finish with one you will be devoured.

But you will have at least heard it if you exist.

I am so sorry. http://loyalkng.com/2009/05/13/how-to-m ... a-stalker/ Our survival in a world overrun with zombies is roughly the same as that in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone; small bands surviving with little more than our wits and tactics. Gear, therefore, would be fairly similar (though remove the recommended alcohol, no random radiation pockets around yet). And yes, STALKER contains zombies-Romero zombies, even, sorta-so don't start in on that.

A guy on my friends list has his motto as something like, "No, now just go away". Something like that.

1) Do you honestly think you can handle killing? Yes. Especially with something as cold and distant as a bullet, easily. 2) Do you think it would change you as a person? Probably not. Maybe, not sure how. 3) Would you think you'd go insane and start a cult with free love? (haha, had to ask that) If I were to go insane, it wouldn't be to start a cult, mate. 4) Do you consider a smaller group to be an advantage? Yes. Quiter, better teamwork, more manueverable and easier to manage resources/ 5) Do you have any problems with killing an infected teammate, knowing it saves their pride by not turning into one of "them"? No. 6) Can you be able to leave people behind if you cannot save them? Not alive. If they were unsaveable, they would become Ol' Yeller. 7) Assuming that "they" work on the basis of sound, then scent, then sight, would you be willing to walk in socks/barefoot to be silent? Why wouldn't I? I wear socks all the time anyway, sometimes without my shoes. If I had to take my socks off, I'd still be fine, but it may make me noiser because I'm not used to it. 8) Do you consider a smaller group (less than 10) to be an advantage? R-r-r-r-r-r-r-repeat. 9) A man driven to insanity is about to rape someone, he has had to kill his family, do you wound him and leave him for them to find, or do you kill him? If the man's insane, he's useless. I don't want him maiking my team members useless as well. Poppin' a cap. 10) You have found a place with other survivors, a leader is struggling, do you give them a handgun, and enough ammo to kill everyone to keep order? The leader then struggles to stop someone raping another, do you kill the person, or merely choke them? What do you mean by "a leader is struggling?" Struggling to keep order? Someone unable to keep order themselves should not be in power, and helping them wouldn't make his group very effective. All about morale. So, no. And as for the raping (why are you so intent on having people rape each other, anyways?) I'd do what I said before. Of course, this entire scenario depends on whether or not I'm travelling alone or with a group. I might just absorb this group into my own. Or pass by them wordlessly, maybe trade for suuplies if I were alone.

Well, not like that, no. But I did own an iguana. He died.

Today I had the most bizarre rain. When i entered the store, all was clear and sunny. 10 minutes later when i come out and it's like Hurricane frikking Katrina. Running across the parking lot I stepped in a puddle that soaked through my shoes and socks in the <1 second I was in it, and I could barely see on the drive home with my wipers at full blast. That was about 30 minutes ago, and now it's sunny again.

I don't think I was being entirely serious numbnuts. You try so hard to correct your own mistakes that were obvious and apparant that they were, indeed, not mistakes. And in the end you make yourself look like a fool. [hide=][/hide] I think I have a new hobby now. Not sure if thats a good thing or a bad thing. No. Cease and desist, or we will not let you graduate.

You know, I'm starting to think this thread may have been a metaphor for something.

Wow. That was actually pretty [bleep]ing awesome, especially the last part. I almost wanted to start pirating stuff. But then I remembered I uphold the law in nearly every situation no matter what. Still, pretty awesome.

Please tell me that means grouchy [wagon]. Because that would make my day.

But it's not just the intendant. It's the superintendant!He could blast him with his laser vision if he didn't go back to his seat! This is just weird, though. If this were me, I would be wondering why the hell I was blowing kisses in the first place.

There's no kill like Overkill.

I think it was a demoman, actually. And jj, they keyword there is "almost". I love ubers :thumbsup: Plus it's more that I was awesome and was head of the point list in 2/3 games and at least present somewhere in the other ones than me pwning you.

Bock-fy-fen-guh-zisht I think. :? back-fei-fen-ge-schikt

Guys punching other guys. Don't know how you don't know boxing. Last time I bet on a match with Mayweather I ended up with the "America's Next Top Model" theme as my ringtone. I place no bets.

No RSOF logic please. RSOF? THIS! IS! OFF-TOPIC! They're words, so they exist and can be used, no matter where they're from. Just because you're not german doesn't mean you can call someone a backpfeifengesicht.

It's a mechanic of the huntsman, whilst you have your arrow up and ready to fire, a friendly pyro can set it on fire before you shoot, adding extra damage and flame damage. Although there was no assist, so thats a bit wierd =/ Unless an enemy pyro hit your arrow or something. I know, and I've gotten tons of kills that way. But when you get a regular fire arrow kill, it's just the normal arrow symbol but on fire. This looks like a flaming backstab. I think it means the fire effect killed him, not the arrow damage, but I don't know for sure. My second guess is a firey headshot, but that looks nothing like a headshot. And jj, go ahead. Nobody will see my awful k/d and I can post the Fastlane picture :

wait, if you knew it was sarcasm, then why would you go and start this whole thing? :wall: Because you used it in a way that made me interpret it in a manner in which it was not intended.

No, I knew it was sarcasm. You just used it poorly.