The_Mather1

Ready.

2 hours left until 22:00 at GMT...

This is already überstupid, because RPGs and RPs do not belong in the same subforum category, RPGs are activities in which you assume control of a character to compete with either others, the scenario or both, RPs are a form of creative writing. There are three options to what's wrong: 1 This is a community subforum, any limitation apart from that of the rules to the content of any post as long as it is in the right thread is idiotic. 2 This is an RPG subforum, RP does not belong here. 3 This is an RP subforum, the threads for which it was created and those created in the following two years do not belong here. Listed in accordance to likelihood.

A roleplaying game is a game, a roleplay is a story. The Tavern is a place for roleplaying games, the use of the wording roleplay instead of roleplaying game was either an accidental or careless mistake on Tripsis' side.

No, Res! I'm still pissed about you calling the Tavern a RP subforum, so you're not going to get the Library closed and the Tavern labeled the official RP subforum.

I've beaten it already. I also have a similiar game on my Tattoo, except it has a total of 370 elements, I passed 200 found on Saturday.

You know how Håkon is anyways, primarily brawns, good brains and awful at dealing with living things apart from canines. His head-on attitude along with his smarts are evident in his use of magic.

Wounds torn up so many times there's nothing left but scarred tissue and the sickening feel of internal bleeding all over... a slight improvement from what it was the last time I reminded myself of it...

Hell yes! :thumbsup: I'll play as Håkon as usual. Do I have to do a backstory? I really suck at that.

How is it the fairest option when it only has one out of approximately 20 community members was discontent with the way it was?

May I ask why you chose to listen to Res even though it is obvious that the majority of the Tavern are opposed to his idea?

He has as much right as anyone to want something, but he's posting it as demands rather than suggestions, something which is unacceptable from anyone. My point with him being a newbie is that it is wrong that he comes into the picture here with the obvious intention of changing it, if he is unsatisfied with the Tavern, why join it in the first place? You can't just join something and immediately start ranting about what you think is wrong about it, that's just disrespectful towards everyone.

No but we do get the occasional glance from the Admins which are our equivalent of them. I'm the equivalent of an old RSC player who tells him to stop being an ass or GTFO.

I'm just saying, how is this different from starting to play RuneScape, standing in the GE and demanding a machinegun?

Res, may I ask what authority or even right you have to command change here? You're the newbie, accept or GTFO! If you really need a reasoning behind our non-game-related threads then consider this, FT is as much a community subforum as a RP subforum.

Catching up? You're at the precise same count.

Arch, yours is ~40% more than it says, mine is ~120% more than it says, I think he was actually going for the extremes, not just random, though it might just be that my profile was the first he clicked. Also yay for Sandra and Woo, that's one of my app-tabbed webcomics.

Not spam, just of too little content something which is both a result and cause of our heavy activity.

Of course it's unique, FT is one of the few subforums which were deemed too active to count towards official posts, hence only a very few others have that chance.

I told you to go back to reading AdultStuck so you would stop bugging me.

No problems here, by blocking me signing out she solved the only thing even slightly annoying in my end. Now if I could somehow just fast forward time then my day would be perfect.

Yeah, listen to the girl whose response to my threat of blocking her as a response to her being annoying was to block me along with the message "Already beat you to it."

A horoscope is based on the Zodiacs, so it is related to them, however the Zodiacs are not related to it as they are constellations that vary over time, not entities defined by horoscopes. It's like saying water is related to a fishbowl because a fishbowl is related to water.

You weren't the one who started the talk, Lei did by mentioning her Zodiac (in origin Hindu, adapted to western), after some discussion on how to define your Zodiac if you're born on a date of transition then you replied something along the lines of "Or you can just ignore horoscopes" which is entirely unrelated to what Zodiacs are, I simply proved that Zodiacs are per origin not related to horoscopes.

Icu, wrong Zodiacs, horoscopes are part of western and Chinese astrology, while the typically used Zodiacs are actually Hindu (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu_astrology#R.C4.81.C5.9Bi_.E2.80.93_the_zodiac_signs).