RichieMcD

I'm not sure about hate crimes growing, but racism in Western Europe is certainly growing. Here in Ireland there is an incredible amount of racism among the working class towards any immigrant pretty much, Polish, Arabs, Africans, Asians etc. The worse part is there passing this attitude onto their children so it's only going to get worse.

EMP's are amazing, they'd do great for attacking small countries with confined space, but lots of people. Without electricity everyone would go crazy, reminds me of a twilight zone episode. If we ever went to war with NK EMP's is probably what would win it for us if it didn't turn into a target for every Nuclear weapon in the world. Armies need 4 things to fight a war, ammunition, food, oil, electricity. Without electricity ammunition can't be made, oil can't be refined and producing food is much harder.

Pallys still have to pay for epic land mount and training at 60, all be it we can do an extremely long quest line which we save about 200g in total in, but the time it takes makes it pretty redundant as you can easily get 200g within that time. Quick question for the longer playing players, when the mount price changes do we get the money back which we spent? Only 3 months ago I spent 520 on Epic training, 1000 on flying a month ago and 5k on epic flying this month. With all the reductions being mentioned, a new player is saving roughly 2k if he gets everything at Exalted.

All that Disney crap I.e Zac Efron, high school musical etc. Anime Nothing else really.

Yeah, warriors are awesome. But how *hard* is it for warriors to say reach 2k DPS after hitting lvl 80? Almost all the warriors I've played with have a huge DPS problem. I can say the exact same thing about DKs. A well played Fury warrior can reach pretty high Dps, but a poorly played one will be pretty crap. Same is with many Dks. The vast majority of Dks I've played with outside my guilds were barely hitting 1500 Dps. It's really all down to the player's skill with the character, not the class.

They might have poor arms yet, but now they have tested a successful Nuclear weapon they're only going to make bigger and more powerful weapons. Not to mention as well that as NK has no allies so they wont lose anything selling methods of production or actual Nuclear weapons onto terrorist organizations.

I'd say roll a Pally and spec protadin, if you ever get bored of it you can change to Dps or Healer.

Lung Cancer. Research please before you post. Cannabis smoke has no form of carcinogenics (what give Cancer) in it, just standard mix of Carbon dioxide and other chemicals in smoke. Smoking Cannabis is actually healthier on the body compared to Tobacco. Not to mention as well there's no deaths attributed to smoking Cannabis within recorded history, smoking's probably around a 200,000 a week or higher throughout the world.

Seriously, if you go around arguing things you "heard" rather than actual facts, you're just going to look idiotic and uninformed.

10. Wont argue with that. 6. What does freewill have to do with children being born with life ruining conditions or children starving to death in Africa. 7. If I told you I just did a triple backflip to 360 on a pogo stick without proof would you believe it? I find it just as believable as the theory of god. 2. Frankly, the old testament contradicts Christianity so much I don't understand why it is included in the Bible. 1. Why not do it on Earth as there's no proof Heaven exists. 4. There's still no evidence that god created the world other than blind faith and fear to explore the unanswered. Science at least has some form of respected physical effort behind it. 3. Not going to argue on this, I haven't investigated the argument before so there's no point in saying Bull[cabbage]. 9. Ye, I'll agree with you on that, pretty stupid questions as it's nothing more than a symbol or a tradition since the days of Christ, 2000 years ago. 8. He's basically arguing many religious figures argue "God and Jesus are all around us within our daily lives", yet there's no logical reasoning behind this. 5. Large areas of the bible seemingly support the idea of slavery, and according to you Christians apparently the Bible is the word of god, so therefore god supports slavery by Christian logic.

Two methods to provide cheap laughs for all the family at home. 1. Place the bowl at a height not accessible to the dog, [bleep]e the food with enough rat poison the knock the socks off a Rhino!! Wait till bird approaches, watch result, chuckle insanely afterwords. 2. Repeat as above, but instead of rat poison use a standard household rice, watch as Cuckoo the Pigeon fly away and all of a sudden bang!! starts to slow and falls to this death!

Because they didn't surrender after the first. Nagasaki occurred 3 days after Hiroshima which is ample time to get an idea of the potential destruction (The vast majority of the city was leveled to the ground), if they didn't surrender 2 days after the attack it was safe to say they weren't going to surrender. A second bomb convinced Japan fighting on against America was just idiotic. It's a pretty sickening fact, but they still saved more lives in the long term as has been mentioned in the topic, I would have done the same if in that position as leaving it any longer gives Japan time to prepare for an invasion or mount a full scale attack on Western America and American troops based in East Asia. As I've said before though, I don't like nor condone the use of Nuclear weapons, but it was the logical choice.

Are you the member of a gym? If not, 2 dumbell bars, some weights and a adjustable weights bench would be more than enough for doing many exercises and training many areas I.e pretty much all your upper body.

I presume you get Irish commentators during the world cup though, we get stuck with the English commentators for every tournament. I swear, if I ever meet Clive Tyldesley I may be compelled to beat him to death, that goes for John Motson as well. Ye, Irish commentators aren't to bad, not as biased as the English ones, don't have a problem slating the Irish team if they play bad as well :lol:

You actually look like quite an idiot as what Dizzle says is relatively true. Although I'll never agree with nor condone the Nuclear bombings of Hiroshima or Nagasaki, the Japanese at the time were so patriotic and nationalistic civilians had no problem to take up arms and sacrifice their life if a full scale land invasion occurred, "for the better of the empire" as they saw it. Although it killed so many people and caused so much suffering afterwords, many more civilians would have died if Japan was invaded. The biggest losses through wars are always civilians. For example in WW2, China lost 3.8 million soldiers but lost 16.2 million civilians. In the initial invasion of Poland, 240,000 soldiers were killed, over 10 times as many civilians were killed......2,760,000 civilians. Japan would lose even more if an invasion by land occurred. They wouldn't wave American flags as the troops went by "liberating" them from the empire, no, they'd be arming themselves with weapons of any kind to try and defeat the foreign invaders. If an Invasion of Japan occurred, losses would be astronomical.

Pretty much the best way of putting it. It's going to be incredibly hard to have disarmament occur due to the fact it takes one side to start it which then leaves them vulnerable if they ever were to be attacked.

Ireland of course, the Republic to be precise since there's also a Northern Ireland team. Once we inevitably get knocked out, I'm just rooting for whatever team England come up against if they get further than us. I've always found Italy a great team to watch, but the amount they dive is seriously ruining the game and referees need to take a tougher stance on it, it's a serious turn off for me in terms of football. As 1MA said, then English commentators are still going on about what happened over 40 years ago, and English newspapers are just unreadable during the World cup period due to the absolute [cabbage] bias printed in them. Seriously, the Brazilians aren't even going on about what happened 7 years ago.

I didn't mean you shouldn't, I just find it hypocritical the most active country of 20th century warfare, the country possessing the 2nd largest amount of Nuclear weapons in the world and the only country to use a Nuclear weapon in an offensive attack a bit hypocritical.......I'm not a fan of hypocrisy. Thanks for the great post comment anyway, it's rare to see those comments on TIF these days. :)

Dude ACOG and AK-74u is a horrible combo, you're using a mid-long range scope on a SMG, meant for low-mid range shots. Not to mention the quick shots and recoil make it close to impossible to aim efficiently.

Situps are highly overrated. Pull-ups only really do some parts of your back, not the whole thing so it can make it look out of proportion. Standard push-ups only do the middle of your pecs. You'll need to do incline push-ups for your upper pecs and decline push-ups for your lower pecs. Check bodybuilding.com it's pretty good for exercises the forum is ok.

There's many different factors on Nuclear weapons which means I've pretty much decided not to hold an opinion on it. Prepare for a long post. Well, yes WW3 has been prevented up to this point due to better political ties and the threat of Nuclear weapons but with rising tension in the Middle East between the Islamic countries, Israel and the West world war 3 could be just around the corner with one false move. If WW3 does eventually come along and we still have Nuclear weapons, it's quite reasonable to expect at least one country to use a Nuclear weapon. Once these weapons are used all rules of war are broken, people throughout the world will be living in absolute fear and many more Nukes will be launched, as it's either launched or be launched at if you're involved in the war. Physical resources will be of little value in WW3 once Nukes are used due to Nuclear fallout rendering them unusable. America and their policies, first of all I don't want to start the "we hate America bandwagon". As America is the only country in the history of the world to use a Nuke in an offensive attack I found it quite hypocritical that it still seems to police the world on who can possess Nukes and who can't. Although America very predictable on what they will do unlike many Islamic militants or terrorist organizations, it still doesn't mean they're the governing body on who can have Nukes and who can't. We have to remember the America was the most active country in 20th century Warfare, the only country to use a Nuke in an offensive attack and currently has the second largest Nuclear stockpile in quantity, Russia being first but America's stockpile is superior to Russia's as they are much more advanced and hold a higher explosive yield. With Obama in power though, I think we're slowly on the right track to ridding the world of Nuclear weapons and Obama actually has the balls to lead by example, unlike past American presidents. Nuclear development. Many countries considered unpredictable, hostile and dangerous throughout the world are currently developing Nuclear weapons or potentially are with evidence pointing to them possibly making Nuclear weapons. North Korea has been confirmed to be building Nuclear weapons although their Nuclear capability right now is very weak, so far their ICBM test failed and their Nuclear warhead tested yielded no more power than that of the Nuke used on Hiroshima, which doesn't compare to modern Nuclear weapons. Although their currently weak in Nuclear terms, they're slowly striding towards average Nuclear capability, dangerous for a country as unpredictable as Nk. Iran....well we really don't know with Iran as of yet. Although they've launched various missiles AFAIK none have had Nuclear capabilities yet, the worrying aspect is though the recent successfully tested mid-range ICBM has the range to reach Israel and American army bases based in the Middle East, a worrying aspect considering Iran is an Islamic country and a Nuclear attack on either Israel or America, both possessing Nuclear capabilities it will not end well at all for the West nor the Middle East. Hostile countries. Currently there are quite a few hostile countries possessing Nuclear weapons who have been hostile with other Nuclear possessing countries in the past. India and Pakistan both roughly possess 60 Nuclear weapons each, although not much if both went to war with each other it's more than enough to decimate each country and kills hundreds of thousands in the Nuclear fallout. India and Pakistan have been quite hostile to each other in the past and could potentially be set off again if one was to attack, all it requires is one drastic move. Although neutral with each other today, America and Russia have been very hostile between each other even up to just 20 years ago. Russia still has quite a lot of Nationalistic viewed people, with rising tension in world politics, Nationalism in America is also is arising. Although it's extremely unlikely to happen, if an Ultra-Nationalist got in to power of either country something terribly wrong could occur. And no, I didn't develop this idea from CoD4. I might add to this later, pretty tired right now. There's roughly 15,000-20,000 armed Nuclear weapons throughout the world with the capability to take out an average size city. 500,000 to about 2,000,000 people. There's about 10,000 other decommissioned weapons throughout the world which can easily be re-armed and used for an offensive attack.

If anything, I'd give you the gear to raise your Dps. I don't see a point in completely gearing others while leaving the undergeared out of they're trying just as hard.

The German death squads that got money for captured jews were 'just trying to make money for their families', too. I'm sorry.....but are you seriously comparing what is essentially fishing to mass planned genocide?

What uncoordinated and awkwardly? There's a difference in many styles of "Hardcore". There's the simple Chav [cabbage] you'll see most drunken 14 years old doing at discos, then there's the much harder to learn Hardstyle Shuffle and Hardjump, this video demonstrates both pretty well If you get good at Hardstlye, Hardjump and Breakdancing, you're going to be a pretty sick dancer to watch and amazing see in a dance off as getting good at all 3 styles allows for so many moves and creativity in your dance. Looks a lot better than the typical drunk white guy trying to do a dance off. OH COME ON. -.- :( However, I like all these moves and styles. I know a bit of breakdancing, but I haven't learned anything else than Helicopter and Freeze. And this odd handstand on a bent knee. Huh. Definitely going to learn more one day. I probably wont use those moves in a dance off if the other guy wouldn't do them, tho. It would be like carrying a bazooka for self-defence purposes. Dude I'm white, all I'm saying is we're pretty poor dancers in general. The seemingly favorite dance of some people the Robot, it stopped being funny about 10 years ago.

I've watched very little of it. But if what the Japanese fishing men are doing, legally fishing Whales then those guys are just a bunch of [wagon]. They might save a whale one day, but it's more than likely a fishing fleet will have got him by the end of the year. Ramming boats? Do these [puncture]s not realise we're not all green peace hippies and some people actually have to go out and work hard jobs for their money? I hope the Japs react and kick their [wagon] tbh.