Dizzle229

Flamebait is flamebait? You bring up the tppics of religion, terrorism, torture, and abortion in one trollerific post.

So... you want easy mode to be difficult? Easy is supposed to be too easy. My ONLY complaint about that was the blood effect when you're hurt, looked like crap.

You actually look like quite an idiot as what Dizzle says is relatively true. Yeah, thanks for that. But I was referring to Dizzle's fervent enthusiasm in policing this thread. Irrespective of what he mentioned in his post. Perhaps I should have made that clearer. At what point did I attempt to police the thread? I just want to keep the flame to a minimum. This is a touchy subject and I don't want this to turn into a flame-fest. Back on topic, obviously no current world leaders are dumb enough to use a nuclear weapon, but like the article posted back on page 2, what would happen if there were some kind of misunderstanding?

Agreed. (until my thought police find you) Wow. There's no way to unspam this post. So how bout' them nukes?

How am I acting like the grandmaster? I think kranked already took that position as thread God. I'm not in any way making myself look like an idiot. Please post in a way that relates to the topic, though if you want to continue the atom bomb debate we could do it over PM.

I think I read somewhere that the US had planned to invite Japanese officials to witness the testing, but they didnt for fear it wouldn't work. I think they should have done something like that, some kind of warning. And Adrenal, I'm not saying alot of people didn't die, but let's face it. There's the 250,000 that die, and the few thousand that died from radiation poisoning and other related complications. That's alot of people. Too bad those same people and then many more would have been killed in an invasion, not to mention all of the US casualties and later on, probably even Russian if they followed through with their promise (they did declare war on Japan, but who knows if they would have done something or just declared to look good, then waited for the war to end.) Anyway, this isn't about why the atom bombs were justified (though they should have had more of a specific warning, not just the vague "Japan faces destruction". Ahem. ON TOPIC

Lenin, if they didn't surrender after Little Boy I don't think they were about to give up. They would have fought down to the last man, as was their policy. The civilians were ordered to take up arms and fight in an invasion. Not just soldiers, not just abled bodied young men, EVERYONE. Men, women, children, old people, the entire population of Japan. We saved far more lives than we took.

We would have ended up killing the civilians anyway. You don't seem to understand how the Japanese worked back then. THEY WERE NOT GOING TO SURRENDER. Hell, the emperor ordered every man woman and child to take up arms in an invasion. Would would have had to kill most of their population. ON TOPIC

We had to, they didn't surrender after the first one. Would you prefer if we invaded and taken hundreds of thousands more casualties?

I guess I can better see what you mean now. I do agree that if we tell everyone else to get rid of them, we should too. You need to see it from the side of the other countries. For example, here we think that Russia is an evil country for holding onto it's nukes when we told them to get rid of them. But when you look at it from their point of view, it's like having two equally equipped knights in a battle, but one knight tells the other he has to go unarmed. Omg, does that mean the the US is a whiny RS pker? :ohnoes:

kranked, that was a great post =D> There's something I'd like to point out. Middle Eastern countries and NK are incompetent, and should not have nuclear weapons. The thing is, most of them dont have much of a nuclear capability. You said you didnt get the idea from CoD4, but that's really what it would take. Some stupid fascist bastard gains control of a world superpower. There's one more thing I need to address. You keep saying that US shouldn't police countries on their nukes because we're the only ones to have used them in combat, but what the hell does that have to do with anything? It just doesn't make sense. We have complete competence on the subject and that's all we need. Please explain that opinion in further detail.

Well just think about it. We would almost have certainly gone to war with the USSR in the mid to late 1900's had it not been for nuclear ICBM's. The fact that major world powers have them has brought the world into a new era. France and UK have a nuclear arsenal. Both countries know what they're doing, and the fact that they have them has kept peace in Europe. China and Russia have nuclear weapons, as does the US. Most likely, this kept the Cold War from becoming an armed conflict. It's countries like Iran, Israel, and North Korea that present a problem.

I saw that, that was quite a celebration \

Well, this is a pretty straight up debate. What do you think of nuclear weapons, the countries that have them, countries that claim to have them, their numbers, etc. All things concerning global nuclear arms. My opinion: Though it seems reasonable that all countries should begin decreasing their nuclear arms stockpiles, they have been a major reason that WWIII has yet to happen. Discuss.

I think in it's current state it's nothing, but just think what this could lead to.

It's made by Pixar. So guaranteed win.

Just thought of another one. The fat on the bits of roast pork in fried rice :evil:

They'll keep making them as long as people are still buying them.

You bastard.

In Germany they're not allowed to show a swastika in games or movies. Every country has dumb rules. Hell, this one isn't even a law, it's just a few schools.

Nice on-topic post. Would read it again. :thumbup: Nice rip-off of a siggied quote. Would read it again :thumbup: Edit: Just had another thought. Maybe there is an afterlife and maybe there isn't, but if there is, does it have anything to do with God?

That's not scary. Zombies are awesome, not scary.

Um, just out of curiosity...why? Though that scan is mighty sexay........

I so agree about smokers, it's disgusting. Most of the idiots at my school. Seriously, between all of them, I swear the fulfill every highschool stereotype, not to mention the took some creative license in being jackasses. -Druggies -Slow people -Emos -Sunday nights -Loud people -People who talk with their mouth full