Dizzle229

support :thumbup:

True. Too few people know that Bush lost the popular vote, the real evil here is the Electoral College.

They're worried that Poland will shoot at them, and they won't be able to shoot back.

I was wondering if I should post it on the RSOF. It could be big, but the on the RSOF, it will likely be on the 10th page withing 20 secs, knocked back by idiots complaining "sum n00b haxzor kill3d me @t duel @r3na m4ke h1m giv mi 1k b4k!!!111!!111!"

I was crossing the bridge where the fountain used to be in Varrock Square. Also, I didn't mention it earlier, but the tree and water were moving, it almost looked like a water mill.

Yeah, when I saw it at first I thought I had accidentally clicked on the map button. P.S. Got my mil, 1022k \

Today I was mining pure ess to make my first mil (only 26k to go, yay!) and as I was crossing the bridge where the fountain was in the old Varrock, I got this image, and couldn't click or anything. I hit Ctrl + At + Delete, and I went to the AOL window, and it was still in fullscreen format, but in the regular window size. Here is the pic.

I think you mean Red Dawn. Wolverines!

*Buries Dizzle alive... In chocolate!* As stated in your shiggeh, you do, indeed, own.

I actually believe it or not hate all sweets. (waits to be buried alive)

What makes you think so? You've already been close of the 3rd strike against non training targets many times, for example in Dien Bien Phu, Vietnam and so on. We nuked (if those thing could even be called nukes, the ones we have now are much more dangerous) Japan, because if we didn't we would have invaded and lost thousands of our men. And you're so superior when compared to russians that only they could do it? I don't say I'm superior, but Russia is on the warpath. They will decide the next move. But right now we aren't even at war, and until we have to shoot down one of their missles over the Atlantic, I don't think that will change. And we WILL NOT vaporize a chunk of a country that we aren't at war with. And I don't think anyone wants a war with Russia.

3/10 I haven't seen you much.

with

8

6,817

You already got enough fire power to destroy this planet even without North Korea or China. USA wouldn't need (if that kind of an alliance would be real on a theoretical level) or even would be able to get any proper help from them if the plan was to nuke Russia. That would be a two bladed sword tho: the retaliation would come immediately and USA would suffer just as much as Russia. Just google images from people who have survived from bombings and been relatively close. I bet many of those would have rather taken a bullet or few. Not to mention that when you got your gun, you can in most cases avoid civialian deaths while bombs don't choose to hurt soldiers only. Erm? Since when was Russia even part of NATO? USA has caused more deaths than Russia after the collapse of USSR. Infact USA's civilian death toll is higher than Russia's total number. USA has also been playing the main role in a lot larger number of military interventions than Russia. USA is all the time provocating Russia, now for example with this missile shield. That doesn't mean Russia wouldn't be a danger to certain nations, but at least I'm more worried about USA than Russia when I look it from the point of view a random man would take. Of course if I take the finn's p.o.v. Russia looks more dangerous. So in the other words you don't believe in the possibility that USA could hit the first strike? What would be your opinion if Russia now nuked a random european country with a strategigal nuclear weapon? Should USA start a nuclear war due one destroyed military section in a random place? What would the alliances do? Clap hands with your generals while watching the counter attack coming? First of all USA got more than enough nukes to destroy this planet (note: russia < earth), second there's no other countries than USA and Russia that could match on a theoretical level: all the other nuclear armed forces don't have even close the same number of warheads, submarines, missile technology or even knowledge on nuclear warfare. In WW2 you had no real clue on the longtime affects of using few nukes on certain areas. During WW2 you were the other country with nukes and a lot a head of others: it took USSR 4 years to get their first nukes and it happened after espionage and huge support from the goverment. Now things are totally different and I'm surprised how you can compare nuking Japan in 1945 to a theoretical scene where you'd nuke Russia on 21st century. I seriously doubt we would make the first strike. A move like that would be extremely idiotic and to be honest, if we nuke them first, then we're just begging to be nuked back.

If we didn't do it in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, thousands of U.S. troops would have died.

Not for a dog.

Hopefully we'll never come to the point where nuclear weapons need to be used, and even if they do, I think we can dismantle them or something with another rocket. Agreed. Nuclear weapons are not a good thing in any case. But if it comes to that, so be it.

You implied an insult, your brother is smart enough to know what you were saying.

Some things you keep to yourself, as most people will tell you. (though the question he asked was kind of tempting)

Alliances. And if they use nukes, so do we. Simple as that. We don't use nukes first, but if it comes to that, so be it.

I never said it would be easy. We need alliances, with nuclear weapons, straight up warfare won't work.

Russia is a danger to the entire world. They need to be destroyed. For every nuke that hits us or any other country, I hope 10 hit them.

No, but misunderstandings are possible. At least then with a taser, it won't matter as much. A very good point, but as long as you only shoot once, which should be the case when used on people around that age, there really isn't a problem. Anyway, there just needs to be strict guidelines of when the taser is used. 1. Person is armed. 2. Person will not back down and is threatening with fists.