mmmcannibalism

Id train with a rune scimmy over a rune long personally for money on ftp if you want to earn money with money you will either have to invest or use it to buy something you can process(rune ess or ore for steel bars as an example) edit--you could use that 2.5mil as part or all of a god armor set if you dont have one already.

Just another thought on this Child pornography is illegal because it is exploiting children correct? Stabbing someone is illegal because it is infringing upon their rights correct? Is stabbing yourself illegal? no, because your allowed to infringe upon your own rights If she was sending along pictures of other underage children I would start to consider light charges, and its a given that legal codes need to catch up to addressing things such as the distribution of child pornography that was initially created with the subjects allowance. While this girl is showing a lack of self restraint, I see no harm she caused to anyone else and therefore conclude this should not be illegal.

you love it long time? on topic, anyone else worried by the volume of bills not related to economic recovery obama is passing/trying to pass?

Uhhh no. Child Porno is like... the most illegalist sexytime thing ever. Meh. If she wants to go be a [bleep] then it's her own damn fault - she needs being told that it's a stupid thing to do but she aint really a sex offender. Just a horny teenage girl. #-o Let me clarify that, Its clearly and rightly illegal for adults to deal in child pornography, and to a lesser extent illegal for anyone underage to distribute images of other people. My question is why is it illegal for her to post nude picture of herself.

I miss fox before Obama won, it was much better(ableit still right leaning) then. From what I read, Fafsa is given based on economic need so whether or not requiring community service is a good idea I can see the rationale. My main concern here is the security force, I really dont like the sound of anything that sounds like a one body organization. I mean its fair to say the youth vote greatly favored obama, and I dont like that this sounds like hes going to organize teens as any type of authoritative force.

Its ridiculous that they are charging her with child pornography. I was under the impression(and belief) that child pornography required you to be over a given age(probably age of consent) and distributing pictures of younger juveniles. To rephrase, how is anything she did wrong in anything but a stupid idea sense?

that was an erm interesting read.

Not sure Id go as far as dismissing detention centers, but it is a good idea to see what progress in social rehabilitation could be made. This kid should be facing some serious therapy and should probably be out of society until he is 18. From what I have heard of this case Id say the kid is probably competant(spelling?) enough that we should consider this a truly serious crime. On the topic of guns, better care of guns by parents would prevent a good percentage of these cases. Yes, there are sociopaths who are going to kill someone anyway but if the gun is locked up with ammo locked up somewhere else like it should be most kids would get frustrated and give up on their plan. Its easier to kill someone with a gun then just about any other method, taking away the easy route will deter a good portion of the offenders. Thats not to say we need gun restrictions, human stupidity and greed cause most crimes, the choice of weapon isnt the cause. Finally, there are two charges because a 9 month fetus is in every way a functional human baby. If it was removed from the womb at that point it could have survived with no medical aid(maybe cord tying).

[hide=] What if u suicide, they will put u in prison :?: P.S: sry, i just saw that topic and this is from 1st page [/hide] they will ressucitate then arrest you :lol:

IBS is a pain, my body has decided its "allergic" to breakfest, pizza and all fast food.

you have the right to do whatever you want to yourself, but you cant impose on other people's rights. If your in the privacy of your home or another secure location I dont care if you want to inject urine into your body its your choice. The main divisions on drug law come about as a matter of public safety. Alcohol is legal but its intoxicating effects are on the same level as marijuanas, so why should marijuana be illegal. The reason a portion of pro marijuana people are against legal heroin or coke is that they are much more destructive across the spectrum. If you smoke pot fairly regularly then you may end up with lung cancer and you will hurt your health, but if you use heroin or coke regularly it will "destroy" your body in a much quicker manner. At a truly libertarian level they should all be legal, but its unrealistic to deny the greater amount of harm the harder drugs can cause.

I pray your right, because that would be so sweet

Wait...what? First of all, math really is my weak point, but logic isnt. If i stand a 1/10 000 chance of getting a visage it meant that for every Dragon i kill i get on one tenth thousand of a chance. you need ten thousand thenth thousands to make ten thousant. Hope you managed to follow me through that. Anyway that being said, if i kill 10k dragons i would have gained 10thousand tenthsthousands, in the end giving me 10thousand. so that means 1/10k says i need to kill 10k to be sure of a dragon drop. now if thats not logic, puleaseee explain how you get to 100k kills? your reasoning is incorrect. each drop gives you a 1/10000 chance, but those ones dont just stack up. simpler example of flipping a coin the chance of getting heads on a coin flip is one half(lets ignore possible tiny weight problems), by your reasoning flipping a coin twice guarentees a result of heads, go flip a coin and you will see you can get two tails in a row. Ill try to explain the formal math later but Im stretched for time.

this There is a rationale behind bans on harder stuff such as heroin due to its truly destructive nature, but a ban on marijuana is entirely unneccesary, and in the case of the US a contributor to a lot of crime.

ok on topic then, Is it fair to say we have a general trend of slightly libertarian slightly liberal economic people on this board?

in response to mage agree to disagree on the economic, since it is a semantic debate at best lets leave it at that. What was the income rate for that 91% tax? While most of your points are somewhat accurate, the masses of america are pretty ignorant and just fall behind whoever has the best rhetoric. If Obama was preaching fascism 80% of the people that voted for him stilll would have, solely on the basis he was a better speaker then Mccain. Id go more in depth, but I dont want this to turn into a giant economic debate. Im sure we agree on a lot of basic principal(universal health care would be good if it worked, the rich should have a higher tax rate and such) but I dont like a lot of your rhetoric that borders on hate speech towards anyone that isnt a socialist. edit--robert, is it okay for you to just use deathdrows compass for me and move it one full notch towards economic left? I could go retake the quiz and get a screenie if that wont work.

[hide=] I would respectfully disagree and say that it's more leaning towards libertarian. For example, its question about health care, "Those with the ability to pay should have the right to higher standards of medical care ," it's highly disingenuous. Of course those with the ability to pay should have the right to "higher" standards of care, but that doesn't mean I don't agree with Universal Health Care. This one as well, "Controlling inflation is more important than controlling unemployment." Only a libertarian would word it like this. [/hide] Out of curiosity why do you disagree with the economic shift? Also, in what way are the health care and inflation questions libertarian favoring, Im sure it will make sense, I think im just missing something On topic, anyone find it odd almost all of us are being listed economically left of Obama? For most americans Obama is pretty far left economically, and I know I am much farther right then him in economic sense.

do you mean taxes on the marijuana or general taxes? General taxes wont go up because of this, in fact in some cases a tax decrease may be possible due to the new source of revenue.

After some thought, I think this compass expresses an economic shift to the left the questions such as the best for the corporation is best for everyone are being asked in a way that will lead centrists and right wingers to answer in a more leftist manner. As an example, I strongly diagree with the best for corporation is best for everyone, but I merely disagree that something good for a corporation is generally good for everyone. any comments on my feeling here?

im like two notches right and one up of deathdrows chart there Im surprised magekillr isnt like infinity left on the social scale :lol: edit--deathdrow, farther left on scale means believe in more economic control by government, farther down scale means more socially liberal(allow people to do more of whatever they want)

context is key here, if you say only 500 more jews to burn for 75 fm at least a few things you say within the minute frame reporting shows is going to show what you mean. Same type of thing with the gold situation the main thing here is that a player can see that when you say you are "burning jews" that it was typo or truly offensive statement, and a good player mod will wait to see what you say after saying I just bought 200k gold; speaking for myself, you wouldnt get reported for saying I just bought 200k gold unless I saw another statement that suggested rwt.

excluding short term reaction, legalizing marijuana would in effect be adding a tax to an existing product, and more tax revenue without taking it out of the income of "common" people would seem like a very good thing for the economy.

conservation of mass, there was another universe before this one that collapsed and caused the big bang. Hm. I'm not sure about conservation of mass. Because where'd that universe come from? The one before it? The one before it? The one before it? Mind-boggling. think of a ball sitting on your floor as the universe, its not going to move(lets pretend nothing else exists) and it will be there forever. Eventually it will have been there forever, and the reason it came about ceases to matter. more scientifically, its just a giant cycle, the water on earth recycles "forever" after all so why shouldnt the universe.

alleged remains, there is a lot of debate as to the life formness of the fossils, would be sweet if they were though.

conservation of mass, there was another universe before this one that collapsed and caused the big bang.