Assume Nothing

Knite wouldn't believe me...

I really don't know anymore... I used to think I would blow it on random stuff but since PvP... I dunno :roll:

Venge + Barrage FTW!

Dw... Think of all the compensational EP you get! \

Okay, I've conducted a little test, basically all I did was give people free kills, lost around 700k in bolts and instantly my total drop value were high, from getting 1.5m average drops into 3m+ averages... Killing second DEFINATELY improves loot.

Well, some variables are more noticable than others. Skull - Yup, you can see a difference. Risking 26000gp instead of 25000gp - Yup, you see a small change in loots. Dying first then do your kills - Better loots Partner being slightly higher level than you - Better loots Yourself having a 110+ combat level - Good loots Impressive hits - That's debatable, but I remember reading 'impressive kills' give better loots somewhere before, on the kb about the PvP drop system. Those are the few very important factors, the rest is just theories and luck.

Got this earlier.

:shock:

I would like to contest this. When I was at the Knight Waves Training Ground getting Chivalry, I brought a whip for my main set of attacks and a DDS and a barrelchest anchor for speccing. The first time I died as I let my stats get drained and didn't use the safespots. On my second try I decided to use the dummies for safe spotting. Poison the knights and then hide. I got a little impatient and decided to pop out and start attacking. I switched to my anchor for the high crush bonus and waited for both HP bars to disappear. I clicked on the knight and as soon as the animation started and I clicked back into my hiding spot. However, the knight still managed to get a hit in before I went back into my spot. Trying this a few more times the knight still managed to hit me no matter what. Frustrated, I switched to my whip and see if it would work. Guess what? It did. I would click on the knight while in hiding and as soon as the animation started I clicked back in. The knight never hit me once while I used the whip. I had to wait until HP bars disappeared, but in the end it still worked and I saved a lot of food and potions. I really don't think all weapons have the same speed for the first hit, at least when it comes to attacking NPCs. Well, the damage is dealt at the same time, even with verrrrrrry slow weapons like dbow still hits at the same time as a whip on the first strike. However, the animation would be longer so running away and 'safespotting' will be different, the fact that the barrelchest anchor requires you to stand around for 1-2 seconds for the animation to finish would make it 'feel' slower on the first strike, infact, it's just the same. Godswords deal alot of damage at the start of a fight against a boss, which is why it's preferred in any GodWarring clan. Besides, the damage per second with whip will be lower than Gs' too because of the whip's low accuracy.

Banned for repeating bans.

Oh! Oh! !!!

Care to elaborate?

Most things are theories, I personally never 26k with a pouch. Skull is a real factor, the person getting killed, well, no not really, as long as they are risking 26k you're fine. Risking alot/Decent armour - that, is just a myth, I would wear good stuff so I'd be sure I won't die from a Pj, but wearing as little as a whip and 76k works, not exactly great when a clawer waits for you... :roll: Potting and stuff - Well, this I haven't really tried, I think KOing does help loot, again, this is just a theory, on my personal dry days I hit bad too >.<. I still think potting and piety helps loot, I did read somewhere about impressiveness of fight giving better loot. I smite and piety to speed up kills, same with super pots, helps alot when you want to efficiently 26k. The smite bit I do anyways, maybe it's not a factor but I don't really care, I just do it anyways. However, you don't have to and I haven't really seen a big difference whether I do it or not, BUT, I do it anyways to speed up kills. I did read somewhere impressiveness of a fight does alter loot a bit. Kinda important things - Combat level, if your opponent is higher combat than you, you're likely to get better loot than if you kill someone lower combat than you. Also, your combat level also reflects loots... If your 126, your bound to get better loots than level 50's. Summoning - Need to conduct testing, never liked it much as people's f2p level can reach my p2p level and are much stronger than I... therefore pjers are more deadly when I encounter one. Dying first, you get a bit of compensational EP dying first, and every time I 26k, I get better loot dying first, my first 5 out of 6 Zaros were from dying first infact. Actually, come to think of it, most of my 26k's are better than my partner's when I offer to die first.... Also - I remember reading somewhere in a screenie saying they 'fixed 25king', this I need to conduct testing on but risking 25k instead of 26k seems to 'give little loot'. Praying mage and summon - that is a total myth imo, but I do it anyways, there's nothing to lose from it... Bh worlds/Pvp worlds - No idea, personally I would never 26k in a PvP world though, why, because I get tagged way too much by idiots who see me risk 5m+ and try to pk me. I have been redbarred whilst looting before, so no, I don't recommend that at all. Most things I said here are just theories, some are fact but I do most of them anyway for not just believing it gets better loot (the potting and piety part), it also speeds things up and makes things faster and better gp/time. Oh and I'm damn tired atm so if what I said were repeated alot, don't blame me, can't think straight =/. Some things I say here can easily be disproven however, I never changed my methods so I can't really make a say on how good each method is, all I know is, my methods works.

GodSwords always win against high defence, the average hit is much higher because you don't hit 0's like the whip does. If only Compfreak still posts.. Edit - Oh, and the fact that the first hit is always the same speed no matter what weapon, you'll deal alot of damage if you want to crash a team.

Kinda missed screenie cause I was watching vids whilst bolting and got it, fml.

Does this count?

W00t, PvP has become a massive gold farm!

Magic the inefficient way, air bolting! :D

Uhmmm, not thread advertising but I created a thread about this... [hide=Dzihouchan says]13 year old girl that got stripsearched -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SAFFORD, Ariz. Savana Redding still remembers the clothes she had on black stretch pants with butterfly patches and a pink T-shirt the day school officials here forced her to strip six years ago. She was 13 and in eighth grade. An assistant principal, enforcing the schools antidrug policies, suspected her of having brought prescription-strength ibuprofen pills to school. One of the pills is as strong as two Advils. The search by two female school employees was methodical and humiliating, Ms. Redding said. After she had stripped to her underwear, they asked me to pull out my bra and move it from side to side, she said. They made me open my legs and pull out my underwear. Ms. Redding, an honors student, had no pills. But she had a furious mother and a lawyer, and now her case has reached the Supreme Court, which will hear arguments on April 21. The case will require the justices to consider the thorny question of just how much leeway school officials should have in policing zero-tolerance policies for drugs and violence, and the court is likely to provide important guidance to schools around the nation. In Ms. Reddings case, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in San Francisco, ruled that school officials had violated the Fourth Amendments ban on unreasonable searches. Writing for the majority, Judge Kim McLane Wardlaw said, It does not require a constitutional scholar to conclude that a nude search of a 13-year-old child is an invasion of constitutional rights. More than that, Judge Wardlaw added, it is a violation of any known principle of human dignity. Judge Michael Daly Hawkins, dissenting, said the case was in some ways a close call, given the humiliation and degradation involved. But, Judge Hawkins concluded, I do not think it was unreasonable for school officials, acting in good faith, to conduct the search in an effort to obviate a potential threat to the health and safety of their students. Richard Arum, who teaches sociology and education at New York University, said he would have handled the incident differently. But Professor Arum said the Supreme Court should proceed cautiously. Do we really want to encourage cases, Professor Arum asked, where students and parents are seeking monetary damages against educators in such school-specific matters where reasonable people can disagree about what is appropriate under the circumstances? The Supreme Courts last major decision on school searches based on individual suspicion as opposed to systematic drug testing programs was in 1985, when it allowed school officials to search a students purse without a warrant or probable cause as long their suspicions were reasonable. It did not address intimate searches. In a friend-of-the-court brief in Ms. Reddings case, the federal government said the search of her was unreasonable because officials had no reason to believe she was carrying the pills inside her undergarments, attached to her nude body, or anywhere else that a strip search would reveal. The government added, though, that the scope of the 1985 case was not well established at the time of the 2003 search, so the assistant principal should not be subject to a lawsuit. Sitting in her aunts house in this bedraggled mining town a two-hour drive northeast of Tucson, Ms. Redding, now 19, described the middle-school cliques and jealousies that she said had led to the search. There are preppy kids, gothic kids, nerdy types, she said. I was in between nerdy and preppy. One of her friends since early childhood had moved in another direction. She started acting weird and wearing black, Ms. Redding said. She started being embarrassed by me because I was nerdy. When the friend was found with ibuprofen pills, she blamed Ms. Redding, according to court papers. Kerry Wilson, the assistant principal, ordered the two school employees to search both students. The searches turned up no more pills. Mr. Wilson declined a request for an interview and referred a reporter to the superintendent of schools, Mark R. Tregaskes. Mr. Tregaskes did not respond to a message left with his assistant. Lawyers for the school district said in a brief that it was on the front lines of a decades-long struggle against drug abuse among students. Abuse of prescription and over-the-counter medications is on the rise among 12- and 13-year-olds, the brief said, citing data from the Office of National Drug Control Policy. Given that, the school district said, the search was not excessively intrusive in light of Reddings age and sex and the nature of her suspected infraction. Adam B. Wolf, a lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union, which represents Ms. Redding, said her experience was the worst nightmare for any parent. When you send your child off to school every day, you expect them to be in math class or in the choir, Mr. Wolf said. You never imagine their being forced to strip naked and expose their genitalia and breasts to their school officials. In a sworn statement submitted in the case, Safford Unified School District v. Redding, No. 08-479, Mr. Wilson said he had good reason to suspect Ms. Redding. She and other students had been unusually rowdy at a school dance a couple of months before, and members of the school staff thought they had smelled alcohol. A student also accused Ms. Redding of having served alcohol at a party before the dance, Mr. Wilson said. Ms. Redding said she had served only soda at the party, adding that her accuser was not there. At the dance, she said, school administrators had confused adolescent rambunctiousness with inebriation. Were kids, she said. Were goofy. The search was conducted by Peggy Schwallier, the school nurse, and Helen Romero, a secretary. Ms. Redding never appeared apprehensive or embarrassed, Ms. Schwallier said in a sworn statement. Ms. Redding said she had kept her head down so the women could not see that she was about to cry. Ms. Redding said she was never asked if she had pills with her before she was searched. Mr. Wolf, her lawyer, said that was unsurprising. They strip-search first and ask questions later, Mr. Wolf said of school officials here. Ms. Redding did not return to school for months after the search, studying at home. I never wanted to see the secretary or the nurse ever again, she said. In the end, she transferred to another school. The experience left her wary, nervous and distrustful, she said, and she developed stomach ulcers. She is now studying psychology at Eastern Arizona College and hopes to become a counselor. Ms. Redding said school officials should have taken her background into account before searching her. They didnt even look at my records, she said. They didnt even know I was a good kid. The school district does not contest that Ms. Redding had no disciplinary record, but says that is irrelevant. Her assertion should not be misread to infer that she never broke school rules, the district said of Ms. Redding in a brief, only that she was never caught. Ms. Redding grew emotional as she reflected on what she would have done if she had been told as an adult to strip-search a student. Dabbing her eyes with a tissue, she said she would have refused. Why would I want to do that to a little girl and ruin her life like that? Ms. Redding asked.[/hide] viewtopic.php?f=10&t=798602 I know it kind of died, but that's thread duping...

Either - Spec that deals max hit or nothing Or just very very very very very accurate and armour piercing yet low strength weapon.

^ Those are just morons, kinda related to noob but meh. ^ Kinda lol'd. Edit - :lol:

O

OWNED SON! Ontopic: Alch em or something..? ;_;

Used up some supplies, sold some, blah blah blah, got 6 zaros, blah blah, you end up with that ^.

Banned for ban evasion. Gf.