Romy

I'd check that with a knife.

I already run, play the piano, play the gutiar, and am fit. Protip: It takes a bit more than that Actually, it takes none of that. No girl would want you because you do or are these things, and no girl would disqualify you on the basis of not doing or being these things. @ I'm happy for you harrinator . As much as I want to agree with you on this point, romy, and I know you have insider info and such, I have to disagree. Though 'tis true that while one would not be attracted or disqualified by these qualities, one with them is more generally desirable than one without them, all other things being equal. As much as so many people would like to deny it, some things can be attractive, and these are some of these things. I believe you to be correct in that it is not a causal relationship though. Just because you do a particular activity does not do anything. Something about the execution of that activity though... I don't think I'm being quite clear. I suppose I should let the self-proclaimed attraction experts talk about this, as much as I hate them scientififying it. lets face the facts. Musicians [especially famous ones] get an instant +2 on their ranking of sexiness, simply for being musicians. Being fit, overall just helps out your attraction. And Confidense is boosted by an innumerable amount. So, let him get all self improved. It couldn't hurt after all ;) Franky, I'm surprised by the amount of guys here that have no idea how to attract girls. That famous musician is sexier because he's succesful, because he's confident, because like Dan said he may be mysterious, etc. NOT BECAUSE HE'S A MUSICIAN. You can look at 2 examples- Example one- an unbelieveably great musician, able to create wonderful sounds with every music tool he lays his hands on, with a great voice, etc. He's also incredibly beautiful and fit and works out regularly. This guy is also very incofident, has a low self-esteem, is shy, and can't stick to one opinion. Do you know a girl that would want him? Example two- a chubby guy, who has no idea what a flute is, and had never seen a guitar in his life. This guy is also very confident, knows what he's doing, is witty and a little assertive, and can actually present a challenge to girls. Do you know a girl that would say no to him? (This question is kind of tricky, because the guy's description would probably turn-off some girls, but I can gurantee that if those girls met such a guy, and he tried to hit on them, he'd almost definitely get them.)

Except no girl is after those traits, even if she tells you otherwise, and you can take my word for it. For the third time- No girl's decision over a guy (whether it be completely dsiqualifying him, or going as far as deciding "he's the one"), is based on certain traits. Yes, most girls would consider it a plus when her guy has a six-pack, or is a phenomenon guitar player, but that's not nearly enough to tilt her decision. Period.

It does. That kid who plays WoW (by stereotype) usually has a low self-esteem, and is very inconfident, while the six-pack guy in a band is (by stereotype) more confident, knows what he has to offer on social events, and doesn't feel nervous near people, etc. [hide] I remember saying that somewhere on Tip.It, but I'll repeat it here. Me and my brother together (over years of research) developed a method for guys to hit on girls. That method works with every guy (granted he uses it properly) and on every girl (regardless of who she is, unless she's a lesbian etc), as long as the guy meets the girl (and not a 5 minute meeting...). That method was lectured to people by me and by my brother, and every single guy that wanted girl X, got her. It has a 100% success rate. The method is based on some psychological principles, that both boost the guy's confidence (by explaining to him why he's inconfident if that's the case, and helping him, through certain exercises, build his confidence) and help attract girls. When me and my brother figured out the method entirely, we both noticed guys using that method, without ever being taught about it. At some point we realised that straight guys (We're yet to figure out what happens with gays) are simply "born with the knowledge" of the method, some just lose it along the way- After being told by parents and society how much they have to invest to get the girls, or watching movies that encourage certain behaviours (that are the opposite of our method), and simply "lost it".[/hide]

Confidence is feeling good about yourself, and knowing you're apt to take on certain things. Dressing well, having a nice body, being talented at something, all of those things elevate your self-esteem. If that doesn't inspire confidence, then I don't know what will. I never ever said it doesn't inspire confidence. What I meant is, that the attraction is a result of confidence, and not musicality or fit body. I completely agree that having a fit body could give a boost to confidence, but the two are not strictly related. Confidence is probably the #1 thing needed when you want to "hit" on girls, absolutly. But that confident musician, is attractive because he's confident, not because he's a musician. (As for succesful people, that's attraction that is a result of success, not a result of being a musician.)

Pre-Internet? I thought it was just an urban legend ._. I have never had either a facebook, myspace, or twitter account :o! that makes me the only person my age i know irl who hasn't I adore you for that :D.

I already run, play the piano, play the gutiar, and am fit. Protip: It takes a bit more than that :P Actually, it takes none of that. No girl would want you because you do or are these things, and no girl would disqualify you on the basis of not doing or being these things. @ I'm happy for you harrinator :). As much as I want to agree with you on this point, romy, and I know you have insider info and such, I have to disagree. Though 'tis true that while one would not be attracted or disqualified by these qualities, one with them is more generally desirable than one without them, all other things being equal. As much as so many people would like to deny it, some things can be attractive, and these are some of these things. I believe you to be correct in that it is not a causal relationship though. Just because you do a particular activity does not do anything. Something about the execution of that activity though... I don't think I'm being quite clear. I suppose I should let the self-proclaimed attraction experts talk about this, as much as I hate them scientififying it. It *may* be true that these activities or qualities are a plus, but not any more than other qualities. Trust me when I say this- none of these activities and qualities would ever tilt a girl's decision this way or that way. Ever. I call bs. The music leads to being musical, which may not be extremely important, but it's better than not being musical. Running and being in good shape definitely influence people's opinions, if only because not running or being in good shape will discourage people. In addition, as harrinator pointed out, it inspires confidence, which is very important in terms of attraction. You can call BS all you want, but check me on this. Being musical is a plus, but isn't going to affect decisions, being fit is a plus, but isn't going to affect decisions, and that can be said about any other quality/activity. As for the confidence part, that's another thing. It's not the musicality, or fit body, that create the attraction, it's the confidence itself.

I already run, play the piano, play the gutiar, and am fit. Protip: It takes a bit more than that :P Actually, it takes none of that. No girl would want you because you do or are these things, and no girl would disqualify you on the basis of not doing or being these things. @ I'm happy for you harrinator :). As much as I want to agree with you on this point, romy, and I know you have insider info and such, I have to disagree. Though 'tis true that while one would not be attracted or disqualified by these qualities, one with them is more generally desirable than one without them, all other things being equal. As much as so many people would like to deny it, some things can be attractive, and these are some of these things. I believe you to be correct in that it is not a causal relationship though. Just because you do a particular activity does not do anything. Something about the execution of that activity though... I don't think I'm being quite clear. I suppose I should let the self-proclaimed attraction experts talk about this, as much as I hate them scientififying it. It *may* be true that these activities or qualities are a plus, but not any more than other qualities. Trust me when I say this- none of these activities and qualities would ever tilt a girl's decision this way or that way. Ever.

51.

I already run, play the piano, play the gutiar, and am fit. Protip: It takes a bit more than that :P Actually, it takes none of that. No girl would want you because you do or are these things, and no girl would disqualify you on the basis of not doing or being these things. @ I'm happy for you harrinator :).

50.

Creep, what else :P?

Quite frankly, I think the Facebook-culture is one of the worst, yet I can't avoid the #1 advantage- it's useful! Now after I'm done with school, it's going to be pretty hard to stay in touch with some of my friends, and Facebook just does that for me.

I'm better than you because FSM created the world, and inside the world created us, and we created pokemon. Thus, FSM created pokemon :D!

I wasn't talking about judging. Judging is something everyone does all the time, to anyone. It's criticizing (or more specifically criticizing out-loud), that seems wrong to me. "Have you seen this guy dance?" "Look at her big nose" "Wow, he sure shouldn't pick his own clothes" etc. Sure, all of us said that once or twice in our lives, but when someone makes that a hobby.... meh....

Whenever I see someone over-criticizing others, I KNOW they're extremly inconfident. What kind of person needs to judge others to feel better about themselves :S...

I'm better than you because I don't have a beard ;).

I still think anyone who found it on time should get a rank, because nothing was said about more than one winner. But maybe that's because I want the rank, and not purely out of logic :P.

I'm a firm believer that "cool" is a matter of attitude, and nothing else.

I'm better than you because at the time of writing this, I have exactly 990 higher postcount.

If you really want the last word in an argument, try saying 'I guess you're right'.... :P

9/10 :)