Crossed_Body

Both Gamaran and Zetman are great. Currently reading Cage of Eden and Magi.

Why doesn't it make sense? If you do not have a shield on your off hand, it makes sense to punch with it.

Fine, let me elaborate: You think that unarmed attacks will use both hands when you do not have anything in the off hand slot equiped?

Nobody uses swh anymore, it's all goliaths now, swh was never really profitable anyway. I think goliaths are one of the items less likely to lose their ability, and since you have to build up adrenaline anyway, you can do 5-6 goliath hits, an ultimate w/ spear, then go back to goliaths :). A better question would be... Would it be possible to dual wield goliaths?

The thing about AC1 is that although it has an interesting story, it is very repetitive. The sequels fixed that aspect while maintaining the same core mechanics.

Don't expect dificulty from AC games. If you didn't enjoy the first 1h of AC1, you won't enjoy the rest of the series.

Don't worry, consoles don't play on max settings either.

I don't think you can dual cast. If by dual casting, you mean using two implements, yes you can with orbs and wands. In he video the mods mentioned that you would halve the casting time of spells that way or something along the lines of that. No, I mean casting 2xSOA.

I don't think you can dual cast.

I don't quite agree, considering you can dual wield different weapon styles (range + melee). How do we know if we were selected for the beta?

Bought HR, already own the other two. Great deal.

That seems to be implied in the quote.

They can't really farcast you with SoA effectively, can they?

Fixed. I wouldn't say it is necessarily the superior platform for sports games, hence the specification.

Aren't weapons/armors modeled directly onto NPCs?

I'm paraphrasing here "I payed 724k just to die". It does indeed seem that the poster couldn't pk properly and was frustrated for getting killed twice and actually losing stuff instead of teleporting away when a superior foe appears. Protip: It's a risk vs reward game. If you can't stand the risk, don't play it.

You've got all of those in the 360. AND the PC is the superior platform for both cod and elder scrolls. No need to grab a ps3 if that's all you play. As ballin' as possible.

Seems to me that you can't PK and you're butthurt somebody killed you and you couldn't escape without paying.

Your opponent wins the entry fee while consuming no resources. I'd say it's pretty cool.

It looks like you can pick and choose to pop up both the chat and the bar.

Can't expect them to give you all of it in the beta, can you? :3

I meant the questlines ended at lvl19 for the beta. I did encounter a couple of bugs, but it is to be expected. I was surprised when I saw how quickly they had read the feedback from the previous beta and acted on it. Possibly a bug, never experienced it. I think I'm not going to play any more PvE during the betas, I'll stick to WvW and PvP so I don't spoil the PvE experience at release. You never really have to worry much when fighting one regular mob. But when a pack or a veteran+ mob comes after you, you need to pull the big guns. And daggers are the close range dps weapons of the elementalist, so it is working as intended. I played a ranger up to level 22 or so, greatsword/longbow. Pets need a lot of tweaking still. Played a warrior in sPvP, it was very fun.

Questlines seem to end at level19. Also, the questline actually depends on the choices you made during character creation... It blew my mind.

I finished the storyline on my human char on my first BWE. Really liked it, feels refreshing to have a storyline that isn't "Go there fetch X" or "kill X boars".

I decided that I didn't want to ruin release for me, so I avoided PvE and stuck to WvW and sPvP. WvW was a bit boring because my server owned 100% of the landmass, but sPvP was a blast. I love what they did with the glory chests.