I love how this is all pin-pointed on Bush. You do realize that a bill must go through several commities before being approved? In those committies, they can alter the bill. If the Legislative Branch did not wish for this law to happen, it would not have. Both the Republican and Democratic parties are "to blame" for this. Bush only approved it, he didn't write it nor alter it to his liking. Except, that's not what those ignorant to how American Government works would have you think. Oh, it must be Bush's fault. Now, what "annoy" actually means is up to the courts. Seeing as this is criminal law rather than civil law, it'll be unlikely that we'll see a bunch of ridiculous law suits such as "McDonalds being sued for hot coffee". If this law does prove to be more of a henderance than a help, it will be appealed to the Supreme Court, where they can decide whether or not it violates the Constitution. Besides, the Government really can directly control speech. In the Supreme Court case Denver v. FCC, it was concluded(wikipedia.org) that ̢̢̮ââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦Ã¢â¬Åthis Court, in different contexts, has consistently held that the Government may directly regulate speech . . .̢̢̮ââ¬Å¡Ã¬ÃâÃ