Sy_Accursed

Your good example includes politics. You cannot feasibly discuss and political book without politics because you are required to mention politics to make any coherent statement about it. You can however discuss a political book without discussing politics itself.

Void set requires you to wear 3 items + a helm. Void items are: Gloves Deflector Top Bottom Elite Top Elite Bottom a combination of ANY 3 of them counts as void set (when with a helm)

I don't know what US is like phone market wise especially but I know msot of uk big companys are there (tmboile etc) and do similar deals so you shuld easily be able to get like 1,000 texts a month for $15 or so. Also with phones its really a subjective thing, you should check their coverage maps and their deals and go for what suits you; not all companys will give you the best coverage for places you spend most of your time. Example for me in the uk: At uni I could use any network. At home only 02, Orange and Tmobile give any coverage atm. So obviously I don;t go and get vodafone or something as it would be useless whenever I'm at home.

If you only want to spend $500-$600 and have no real reason or idea as to why you want/need a Beowulf Cluster. Why bother with it? Seems like an awful money sink just for the sake of novelty. I mean outside big corporation and research type things Beowulf Clusters aren't exactly useful. Tbh it sounds like you're spending for the sake of spending which is a bad idea. If you want to build something build something that actually useful to you and sink that $500 - $600 into 1 high spec system. Other than that new parts in the way to go, used computers are generall sold on when they are outdated and or/breaking down so the parts r probably lower spec than what you'd get buying bits and odds of them failing on you are much higher.

I can't wait to get to read this, thought I am waiting for paperback and can't read for pleasure until summer holidays so it will be a while for me!

Why do people leap to obscure references? eg every rose has its throns is a straight quote of a realllly old saying (think it might of been greeks?) not some obscure reference to a metal band who used it as a lyric. And "Death Clock" is again a reallly old and well known image of the clock (often shown as an hour glass) pertaining to everyones life that slowly ticks down to your death.

Also note there is no guarantee that they will re-release the same emotes again. Sometimes holiday emotes are exculsive to doing the event that year specifically and not re-released.

The ghost is easy. He travelled slightly to the future; therefore he answers before you ask. Simply read what he says then pick the dialogue option that would cause it. Eg he says "Why you are rude" so you say "Sheesh your an idioit" He says "Well you are a fine man, that sounds like a good idea" so you say "Sorry I did not mean it, let me buy you a beer." etc.

Still don't like blocking filling. I have used it to start the white areas though cause you can't paint white on white lol.

I hate the "block it in" style in everything but pixel art. I find it never comes out as good, by just working into it more and more with various tones you get a far more realistic disperesal of tones and it is easy enough to concentrate dark and light tones to mimic light and shadow.

Decided to do a bit more before bed, hope its looking fairly ok so far.

Firstly your order is wrong. The weights lightest to heavyiest are: 3,5,2,6,4 Secondly its in the wording of the dialogue. The text says the box LABELLED AS two is actually. This means you are telling him what the box labelled as two should actually be. Not what box should be labelled two. When you look at the correct weights with the true order. 3,5,2,6,4 2,3,4,5,6 The box labelled as two is in the middle, where 4 should be. So the box labelled as two should be 4.

Wanted to get into this for ages so I have! Thought I'd start with something easy, so I picked this teddy: And this is my work so far: [hide=Previous Versions] [/hide]

So I happened to glance out my window and the green & yellow trees of the road behind looked pretty dramatic against the heavy grey clouds so I decided to grab a snap. Unfortunately I missed that shot cause it vanished fast, but as the light dyed and the rain set in I did get this shot which I think is pretty stunning, even if rather simple and slightly blurred from camera shake (its cold out when ur in pjs! lol)

Even without a rapier metals aren't a problem with leaf bladed sword or now even better korsari's sword.

Or I could jsut post what I posted and get advice from both cannoners and non-cannoners with reason behind them and make a fully informed decision of what route appeals the more.

Well I'm soon gonna get onto kuradel for slayer (finally) So which of her tasks would you recommend blocking?

2) wtf planet are you on? Its a VERY common question; it appears here like atleast once a day.

This. The in-game "logic" behind it is thus: Defence level is how well you can dodge, evade and otherwise resist physical damage. eg a weapon stabbing into you or an arrow hitting you. (they do after all ultimately both rely on a bit of metal doing physical damage to you) Magic defence is taken mostly from mage level because magic uses magical energy to damage. The better you control such energy, the better you can resist it. Also it isn't primarily physical damage; beyond the relatively weak impact of energy upon you its damage comes from the energy being released.

Thou of course you could of jsut picked it up from your grave...

"I feel if RuneScape introduced tiered currency, coins and currency in general could have and maintain a lot more uses. Certain items could be a specific type of currency, which could either by used solely to purchase something or in conjunction with other lower tiered currencies... No longer would players NECESSARILY have to deal with pumpkins and lower rares to purchase higher rares. How this could be implemented, I am unsure, it's why I am posting here, to gather opinions from intelligent people willing and that are open to new ideas and different approaches" This is still in there however and you cannot back this up of justify it. And we HAVE covered other parts of your idea. If you go back we've both agreed with most of the other elements you posted. This one only continues to come up because you refuse to justify it or drop it; instead opting to rage at us for politely and legitimately questioning part of you're idea.

Erm given we have both commented on ALL aspects of the idea I fail to see us being "stuck" on anything. And as I said several times before: If you CANNOT answer questions on it and CANNOT back it up don't post it. Half the stuff you've said you don;t have answers for is part of your opening post, go back edit these bits out; you can't just claim things as part of your suggestion unless you can back them up with logic and reason. I mean I can't post an idea saying: "Jagex should add a quest about hedgehogs. It might stop junk trading" Then just get angry at people for questioning the junk trading bit because I have no justification for it.

This. Stop it. No, there is not a chance, because trading sticks are completely unrelated to the rares market. As long as you keep pretending it might be, you are not dropping the subject and it's ridiculous to expect that everyone else will. To think you seem to know inside and out how to fix this portion off the market comes off as very conceited. I dare say you know jack about it either, I don't see you coming up with any ideas other than "FIX THE GE", which is what everyone else spews out on a daily basis. I will not stand down on my point that there is a chance for it to be implemented, WHICH IS WHY I POSTED THIS, to gather ideas from optimistic posters <Profanity Removed>. Obviously there aren't any of those to be found at this hour, so I will be going to sleep, and hopefully someone a little more optimistic will have posted by the time I wake up. Yes stand by your view. But when questioned you need to give actual reasons. No-one has refused you're view we have only QUESTIONED elements of it. And in return we have been flamed, cussed at and told to not talk about certain parts of you're idea.

If you don't want to be questioned on certain issues you should not bring them up and should remove them from the opening post. We are perfectly entitled to bring up things you have mentioned, you can't jsut say "oh I don;t want to be questioned about that bit anymore" because you can't give any real answers. And you brought up junk trading and said you're idea MIGHT fix it so yes it is YOUR job to tell us how or not to even claim it.

Look at my 4th post in this thread, the one where it says I don't want to make this only about rares any more. Then you, bedman, and green go on to do exactly what I just asked not to happen, continue to ask about rares. So what do I do? I respond. Then you get angry that I keep talking about them? Perfect sense. And Realize, grow up Erm I've re-read the entire first page. No-one mentioned rares after you diverted from them, other than me in brief passing & Bedman in like his only post on the thread. And you did in fact bring up junk trading before anyone else. You're angry at us because you brought up junk trading and we questioned it? Also yes you have posted reasons now for you're points, but they all boil down "draw people back to other currencies and give them more use" which is great but is a total diversion and ignoring of other points you previously brought up about junk trading etc that we questioned. In that form of merely making other currencies more useful and drawing some attention back to them yes its a fine idea; as for your other spiel about fixing the market and junk trading its total rubbish.