Miss Lioness

Future updates don't make the skill useful now. Now, we have an extremely bare-bones 'skill' with no interesting parts. Releasing an interesting update, with actual work put into the design, doesn't stop anyone from releasing updates to the skill later on. Look at Dungeoneering, which has received the task set only recently, after several years. So you expect a fully fleshed skill on release? Look at Summoning, Dungeoneering, Construction. Neither of these were "complete" till some years after their release. Heck even Dungeoneering still lacks Floor 61 and is therefore still not complete. It might feel bare boned now. But give it a year and I'm sure it will be more fleshy =3

Fastest would presumably be construction with Demonic Thrones. It is theorized that one could get from 13m exp to 200m exp in about 15h, however it would cost 193 Billion GP. And I know this is from last week, but I just wanted to contribute this =d. Can't do much when I'm in uni =S

I have truely no idea how this happend o.O... I'm pretty sure I quoted that guy in 200m all thread =d.. Will fix it nowwie XD

Or it's one month after the release.Exactly. If Jagex really was all about selling spins for Div, they would have opened the skill up to lamp use weeks ago. But they waited exactly one full month which is quite a reasonable timeframe IMO.A month is far too long. So many maxed players wasted so much bonus xp by not being able to use it on such a bad (boring, slow) skill. Divination is designed to be a bonus xp sink, with the low xp rates and extremely boring grind. Not allowing bonus xp on Divination is like not allowing effigies on runecrafting (back in the day). If they had really wanted to make an 'old-school' gathering skill, they could have, easily, and it would've had urns, it would've had a minigame, it would've had about 50 different resources that aren't even worth it (but hey it looks cool), it would have an AFK method and a high-attention method, it would have some profitable resources but none of them worth it and finally the mid-tier resources would be the best xp/h. None of this holds for Divination. The only thing that gathering skills have in common is that they are slower, therefore better to use bonus xp on. I conclude: Jagex designed the skill to be a SoF promotion magnet, and they added some popular rhetoric to make it seem like they were meeting the community's wishes. The one month is just part of the rhetoric. It isn't based on the actual use of the bonus xp ban, which is to allow a fair grinding contest. The contest is over, the first to 99 has been recorded, and nobody else will be remembered until someone hits the first 200m. If 200m is too far, then you should just allow bonus xp past the first 99. But since Jagex doesn't care about any of this, they just set the longest ban they feel they can get away with because they think it'll be popular (I think it's popular only because it delays the inevitable SoF promotion, because I don't think anyone enjoys grinding Divination more slowly). I would disagree. Jagex has designed this skill for now this way, so they can make updates for it in the future.

Fixing it =d

It is possible, just not feasible.

Why does everyone forget Lover Romeo... who is now apparently.. Islam Peace.. when did this happen. He didn't forget it... LR is the first person to reach 200m in 2 seperate skills and claimed rank 1 in them. If Drumgun manages to be the first to 200m Divination, he will be the second person to reach 200m in a skill at rank 1.

IMO, no... Only within one game I would count it and only if it is etched in stone e.g. 200m in a skill.

And IMO only Lover Romeo deserves the title to be rank 1 in 2 skills as he got it etched in stone. Drumgun/Toony both didn't keep the rank 1.

The super and supervillain titles are rewarded for completing 10 challenges in the Super September event. The super super and super supervillain are rewarded for coming in the top 1000 players for either of the 2 Super September hiscore events.

http://runescape.wik...i/Rock_fragment

I'm thinking she doesn't have that much money... Still a fun thought, however. ;) ~D. V. "Yeah, that's too pricey..." Devnull Well I pay about 15€ a month for about 1GB I-net, 75 phone minutes (I'm near deaf so I dont use it much) and unlimited text messages. Pretty cheap may I say =3 Wow that's about a quarter of what I pay for 100MB Internet, 100 phone minutes and unlimited text messages O_o. Guess it's true when they say Canada is one of the most expensive countries in the world for that. I do have discount because its ordered via work. Still you would be twice more expensive now, even with that bundle o.O

I'm thinking she doesn't have that much money... Still a fun thought, however. ;) ~D. V. "Yeah, that's too pricey..." Devnull Well I pay about 15€ a month for about 1GB I-net, 75 phone minutes (I'm near deaf so I dont use it much) and unlimited text messages. Pretty cheap may I say =3

Indoctrinated, nuff said...

No, just using the middle option ;D!

A part of Pi has that number. It all equates to the same thing >.>

And another one bites the dust:

http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/1ktc10/we_are_the_runescape_developers_for_the_new_skill/cbsexmx

That statement has been corrected afterwards!

1 Month after release. They have mentioned that multiple times and are sticking to it.

Oh right, should have mentioned I'm using Chrome. I prefer it looks and simpleness without all the clogginess of buttons and stuff everywhere. I have found a few NoScript alternatives for Chrome, one of them being certified by Chrome: SafeScript. Still I have no clue what it does =S. On the second thing: I have no idea what goes into my cache and whatnot. All I know is that I need to clear it from time to time =/ Overall I don't use any RSS feeds but the 'General RSS Reader' where you need the url for it to work. So manual input... On another note, I have some problems with Chrome lately. It seems he is loading multiple pages through like there is an auto forward going on. Do you know how I can get rid of it? I like to backspace or backbutton (a button on my mouse to go to the previous page) to go back. however it loads the same site and if I right-click on the [<-] I see a list sometimes very long of the same webpage. If I then try to go back it reloads the same page and that list gets longer, unless I'm quick enough to skip the forwarding... You seem to know a lot about web browsers and browsing in general and this is getting on my nerves slowly. I have tried if there was a program on my Laptop, but I couldn't find any. I have also checked my cache, cleared it. Checked extensions, etc. Now I'm pretty much clueless. The only thing I can think of that this is due Chrome itself. Not sure what other browsers do...

Avoid social networks, anything else with live streams, and anything that will download massive amounts of data (such as upward of ~1 MB-4 MB in one go) like huge flash applets and java applets. Heck, you'll probably have to avoid RuneScape until you have better internet, due to the large data chunks that load when you're changing areas, as well as what happens with every single game update. :( Don't clear your cache, but never let it fill up large areas (like, 3 GB, which is way beyond too much) of your computer's hard drive either. A maximum of 140-160 MB(Slow computers)/256 MB(Midrange Computer)/384 MB(High-End Computer) of disk space for your browser's cache is honestly all that's necessary and can be used without suffering real performance issues, and that's at a level where you can let the browser auto-determine when it needs to clear parts of that space for other data. Anything more is normally literally a waste and will slow things down, as I've come to learn the hard way, so only use more if you really have to. :mellow: I would suggest turning off display of images on sites (If you even still can...) unless you need to see them, or you will eat up a good chunk of that data limit. Also, use AdBlock Plus and NoScript to keep the extraneous junk scripts/ads/widgets out, in order to make a reactive defense against those, or your data limit will be reached extremely quickly. (Yes, I admit you'll have to manually control AdBlock Plus and NoScript, but the payback on lack of junk is well more than simply worth it, and you even get to see all of what a page really doesn't need. You may even find it scary, being that there are tons of analytics companies that are profiling you while you're not even looking at what pages load, and even to an extent where you lose bandwidth from background auto-pings!) :geek: I hope all my thoughts here help you in some way, and good luck at the university that you're going to! :thumbsup: ~D. V. "Trying to help beat away bandwidth drains..." Devnull (p.s.: Just for reference, those junk ads/scripts/widgets out there have forced me to build a total of 1414 active filters in my AdBlock Plus build... but all that work has saved me a lot of time!) I already use Adblock Plus and Adblock Pro. Both are good enough to get rid of 99,99% of the ads. But I am wondering what NoScript actually does and how it works. Next I would like to know how I could set-up a cache limit, I have a pretty high-end laptop so I think I could do a higher end limit. Avoid social networks, anything else with live streams, and anything that will download massive amounts of data (such as upward of ~1 MB-4 MB in one go) like huge flash applets and java applets. Heck, you'll probably have to avoid RuneScape until you have better internet, due to the large data chunks that load when you're changing areas, as well as what happens with every single game update. :( Avoid social networks and streaming is good advice. Runescape though is still playable with such a limit as it doesn't load much at all, much lower than what you think they do, Devnull. I measured it a couple of weeks ago because I needed to tether for a bit, to see if I could still play, and loading Runescape uses less than 1MB and while playing, uses dial-up era bandwidth (Provided there wasn't an update that day). Don't clear your cache, but never let it fill up large areas (like, 3 GB, which is way beyond too much) of your computer's hard drive either. A maximum of 140-160 MB(Slow computers)/256 MB(Midrange Computer)/384 MB(High-End Computer) of disk space for your browser's cache is honestly all that's necessary and can be used without suffering real performance issues, and that's at a level where you can let the browser auto-determine when it needs to clear parts of that space for other data. Anything more is normally literally a waste and will slow things down, as I've come to learn the hard way, so only use more if you really have to. :mellow: Why suggest so low numbers for cache? Your computer must be extremely slow if it can't handle more cache than that. On such a low limit I suggest not clearing the cache at all even if it reaches large amounts of Data, at least if it's a temporary situation. I, myself, am the type of person that does not clear cache often, and can sometimes have upwards of 5GB of cache on my mid-end computer, and no slow down. At that point it's more of a security reason to clear it. I clear my cache every time I need to do bank business over the I-net =/,,, And does it help if I play RS in client? I.e. less cache or something? And if there is an update I could just predownload the update somewhere else before logging in right? Is there a program that can keep track of bandwidth usage for me? For specific programs I mean, or even specific websites? I'm using a dongle, thats like unlocking mobile 2G or so for laptops xD