Jump to content

ember3579

Members
  • Posts

    738
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ember3579

  1. A lot of people admit to crimes they haven't committed. But even then, capital punishment is much more expensive than housing a criminal in prison until they die. This isn't because of the high cost of poison (see: rat poison), but because of the elaborate system that states set up (for perfectly reasonable reasons) to make sure the person being sentenced to death has done what he/she is being prosecuted for. So, economically speaking, capital punishment isn't a very good option. This is why I believe that this sort of thing should be wrapped up in it's own sort of special court. Basically, here's the way it works. If someone's accused of a truly evil act, they go to this court. There's 3 basic outcomes of it; they're found not guilty, they're found moderately guilty (not sure of the best term for this, but basically the normal rules apply sans capital punishment), and they're found inexcusably guilty. If they're found inexcusably guilty, which would need ultimately undeniable proof that both they've committed what they're accused of and that they pose too much of a risk to be left alive, they are put to death in one of a variety of cost-efficient ways (firing squad, hanging, etc.). The time between the person being found inexcusably guilty and them being executed should be considerably short (1-5 years max) in order to finalize everything. If at some point during this time period something comes up that throws ANY doubt onto the conviction, they are transferred to a non-death row prison until either they're reconfirmed guilty or proven innocent. Please keep in mind that if they're deemed inexcusably guilty, then almost all appeals would be redundant (considering the fact that most of them are on petty [cabbage] that has nothing to do with whether or not they're guilty, they would be removed from this process except when actual evidence to innocence is presented). Would this work? Of course, anybody with power could abuse any system whatsoever, so please leave that sort of excuse out of this.
  2. Warrior, that's the sort of circumstance that I believe should be what capital punishment is reserved for. When someone commits atrocities above and beyond the normal stuff, and there's no possibility for any sort of reformation, they should be exterminated before they commit another atrocity.
  3. Oh. Alright. Still, I thought we were a bit off from being able to repurpose viruses for beneficial uses. Cool, regardless.
  4. I'm interested. What you need me to do?
  5. I don't watch House very much. Also, I somewhat expect television shows to pull things from the sci-fi realm (specifically, the near future one for this sort of show), and they don't always represent what can be done in the real world.
  6. What exactly are you reading to make you say that? The modified HIV virus infects a cell, delivering a gene to negate a mutation in the original gene. I thought this was some sort of virus causing the 2 boys' brain disease. I haven't heard of any process that could effectively use one virus (albeit a modified one) to neutralize and destroy another after infection. This basically rewrites an entire chapter in the rule book of infections. Which, if people know anything about medicine, is a pretty big thing.
  7. Using one virus to kill another. That's one of the craziest (and therefore best) ideas I have ever heard of people actually pulling off in real life. God, I love science.
  8. Two things; dialup and I know how many people [cabbage] on those sites.
  9. Personally, "capital punishment" is used in a wrong manner. It's not really much of a punishment, because the person in question won't be around after to learn from it, and unless if it's a public execution, most others wouldn't either. I think that it should be primarily used as a removal agent. It should be reserved for only the most dangerous offenders, those that simply cannot be rehabilitated and will, without a doubt, inflict suffering on as much people as they can in their own personal manner. Execution's point isn't to teach a lesson, it's to make sure that rabid dogs get put down and can't cause any more harm. If they're at that point, then all that really needs to be done is the legal work that affirms there is absolutely no chance whatsoever that this person is innocent of the atrocities that would put him in this manner, the procurement of a very powerful firearm and appropriate ammunition, and the disposal of the body, which should take about a year from the end of the trial. Keep in mind that if this were to occur, then the whole process would have been gone through on every possible detail so much so that appeals would be redundant. If there is any doubt whatsoever that someone DIDN'T do the things they're accused of, then they're shifted in to the less permanent consequences (imprisonment comes to mind).
  10. While I know what cardio is (keeping my heart rate high for an extended period), I don't much know about any of the other three. If it helps, act like you're talking to an idiot. ^_^;;
  11. I'm 18, ~6', ~220 pounds, and I don't really know where I'm at with this, so basically level zero? Also, what's a Theraband? I can take a wild guess at what a Swiss ball is (large-ish inflated rubber ball), but I have no clue what a Theraband is. And by free weights, do you mean dumbbells? I should have no problems getting some of those. Lastly, I do NOT have enough space for anything larger than handheld. It simply cannot be done at this time. Thanks for the assistance, by the way.
  12. Part of my main problem with some of this are these facts. One, I don't have access to any sort of gym in my area whatsoever. Two, I don't know anything about what sort of equipment to get, or the vast majority of these exercises period. If at all possible, can someone just give me a good list of things I should get and a basic exercise plan for newbies (preferably, the only thing that needs to be changed is the weights/rep count when I need to increase difficulty)? That would be the best thing for me. I can handle the nutrition part of it.
  13. Assassin_696, where in all the Hells did you find this?!?! :shock:
  14. You're forgetting how freaking HUGE the galaxy is. Remember, Galaxy =/= Solar System. Comparing our solar system to the Milky Way is akin to comparing a speck of sand to a beach. It makes perfect sense to me that it'd take a long [wagon] time for us to make a half-rotation that slowly. :-s I'm not sure what you're getting at. We get on the right side of the sun every year, so it happens every year. If you're going to take into account the 'wobble' of the solar system instead of being generally the same side, 2012 will be about 6 degrees off the centre region. It's not unusual. Besides, the precise location of the centre of our galaxy is unknown because it's flooded with light. Yes, we get on the right side of the sun every year. However, this is FAR from revolving around the galaxy in a year. That process takes about, if I remember, 50,000 years. This makes this a very rare occurrence. Also, one of the things supposed about this mark is that it will have an effect on our planet's crust similar to the moon and sun's effect on the oceans. I'll leave you to think over that one. Not revolving around the galaxy, I don't know where that came from. Just logically the sun will come between us and the center once a year. Doesn't matter if the center is 25,000 light years away or not. I assume it works similar to Earth's magnetic fields. It wraps around the planet fairly well, but is concentrated heavily at the poles. We're going to pass through the galaxy's gravitational "pole" around 2012. Do you get it now?
  15. You're forgetting how freaking HUGE the galaxy is. Remember, Galaxy =/= Solar System. Comparing our solar system to the Milky Way is akin to comparing a speck of sand to a beach. It makes perfect sense to me that it'd take a long [wagon] time for us to make a half-rotation that slowly. :-s I'm not sure what you're getting at. We get on the right side of the sun every year, so it happens every year. If you're going to take into account the 'wobble' of the solar system instead of being generally the same side, 2012 will be about 6 degrees off the centre region. It's not unusual. Besides, the precise location of the centre of our galaxy is unknown because it's flooded with light. Yes, we get on the right side of the sun every year. However, this is FAR from revolving around the galaxy in a year. That process takes about, if I remember, 50,000 years. This makes this a very rare occurrence. Also, one of the things supposed about this mark is that it will have an effect on our planet's crust similar to the moon and sun's effect on the oceans. I'll leave you to think over that one.
  16. Simply put, I want to get more physically fit. However, I'm not doing this to look good (although this would help), or to compensate for something (you know who I'm talking about :P ;) ). I'm wanting to get physically fit with the express purpose of being able to fight better. This means I want durability, flexibility, and raw strength. There's only one problem; I have absolutely no clue whatso-f#$king-ever as to how I should go about this. One of the ideas I've come up with is to wear weighted clothing whenever possible for constant endurance and strength training, but I'm not too sure about anything else. Can any of you meatheads help me out? |^_^|
  17. I'm just running on the "second chance" philosophy. I'm giving this person ONE shot before I start reporting him/her (don't know which, personally) every time he posts like that. It's better to give people the benefit of the doubt first before you bring out the paddle in most cases.
  18. This is my results on the IPIP NEO. Be forewarned, this is very, very long. [hide]Extraversion Extraversion is marked by pronounced engagement with the external world. Extraverts enjoy being with people, are full of energy, and often experience positive emotions. They tend to be enthusiastic, action-oriented, individuals who are likely to say "Yes!" or "Let's go!" to opportunities for excitement. In groups they like to talk, assert themselves, and draw attention to themselves. Introverts lack the exuberance, energy, and activity levels of extraverts. They tend to be quiet, low-key, deliberate, and disengaged from the social world. Their lack of social involvement should not be interpreted as shyness or depression; the introvert simply needs less stimulation than an extravert and prefers to be alone. The independence and reserve of the introvert is sometimes mistaken as unfriendliness or arrogance. In reality, an introvert who scores high on the agreeableness dimension will not seek others out but will be quite pleasant when approached. Domain/Facet........... Score Extraversion...............71 Friendliness.............75 Gregariousness...........70 Assertiveness............68 Activity Level...........58 Excitement-Seeking.......63 Cheerfulness.............57 Your score on Extraversion is high, indicating you are sociable, outgoing, energetic, and lively. You prefer to be around people much of the time. Extraversion Facets * Friendliness. Friendly people genuinely like other people and openly demonstrate positive feelings toward others. They make friends quickly and it is easy for them to form close, intimate relationships. Low scorers on Friendliness are not necessarily cold and hostile, but they do not reach out to others and are perceived as distant and reserved. Your level of friendliness is high. * Gregariousness. Gregarious people find the company of others pleasantly stimulating and rewarding. They enjoy the excitement of crowds. Low scorers tend to feel overwhelmed by, and therefore actively avoid, large crowds. They do not necessarily dislike being with people sometimes, but their need for privacy and time to themselves is much greater than for individuals who score high on this scale. Your level of gregariousness is high. * Assertiveness. High scorers Assertiveness like to speak out, take charge, and direct the activities of others. They tend to be leaders in groups. Low scorers tend not to talk much and let others control the activities of groups. Your level of assertiveness is high. * Activity Level. Active individuals lead fast-paced, busy lives. They move about quickly, energetically, and vigorously, and they are involved in many activities. People who score low on this scale follow a slower and more leisurely, relaxed pace. Your activity level is average. * Excitement-Seeking. High scorers on this scale are easily bored without high levels of stimulation. They love bright lights and hustle and bustle. They are likely to take risks and seek thrills. Low scorers are overwhelmed by noise and commotion and are adverse to thrill-seeking. Your level of excitement-seeking is average. * Cheerfulness. This scale measures positive mood and feelings, not negative emotions (which are a part of the Neuroticism domain). Persons who score high on this scale typically experience a range of positive feelings, including happiness, enthusiasm, optimism, and joy. Low scorers are not as prone to such energetic, high spirits. Your level of positive emotions is average. Agreeableness Agreeableness reflects individual differences in concern with cooperation and social harmony. Agreeable individuals value getting along with others. They are therefore considerate, friendly, generous, helpful, and willing to compromise their interests with others'. Agreeable people also have an optimistic view of human nature. They believe people are basically honest, decent, and trustworthy. Disagreeable individuals place self-interest above getting along with others. They are generally unconcerned with others' well-being, and therefore are unlikely to extend themselves for other people. Sometimes their skepticism about others' motives causes them to be suspicious, unfriendly, and uncooperative. Agreeableness is obviously advantageous for attaining and maintaining popularity. Agreeable people are better liked than disagreeable people. On the other hand, agreeableness is not useful in situations that require tough or absolute objective decisions. Disagreeable people can make excellent scientists, critics, or soldiers. Domain/Facet........... Score Agreeableness..............95 Trust....................89 Morality.................81 Altruism.................86 Cooperation..............54 Modesty..................89 Sympathy.................98 Your high level of Agreeableness indicates a strong interest in others' needs and well-being. You are pleasant, sympathetic, and cooperative. Agreeableness Facets * Trust. A person with high trust assumes that most people are fair, honest, and have good intentions. Persons low in trust see others as selfish, devious, and potentially dangerous. Your level of trust is high. * Morality. High scorers on this scale see no need for pretense or manipulation when dealing with others and are therefore candid, frank, and sincere. Low scorers believe that a certain amount of deception in social relationships is necessary. People find it relatively easy to relate to the straightforward high-scorers on this scale. They generally find it more difficult to relate to the unstraightforward low-scorers on this scale. It should be made clear that low scorers are not unprincipled or immoral; they are simply more guarded and less willing to openly reveal the whole truth. Your level of morality is high. * Altruism. Altruistic people find helping other people genuinely rewarding. Consequently, they are generally willing to assist those who are in need. Altruistic people find that doing things for others is a form of self-fulfillment rather than self-sacrifice. Low scorers on this scale do not particularly like helping those in need. Requests for help feel like an imposition rather than an opportunity for self-fulfillment. Your level of altruism is high. * Cooperation. Individuals who score high on this scale dislike confrontations. They are perfectly willing to compromise or to deny their own needs in order to get along with others. Those who score low on this scale are more likely to intimidate others to get their way. Your level of compliance is average. * Modesty. High scorers on this scale do not like to claim that they are better than other people. In some cases this attitude may derive from low self-confidence or self-esteem. Nonetheless, some people with high self-esteem find immodesty unseemly. Those who are willing to describe themselves as superior tend to be seen as disagreeably arrogant by other people. Your level of modesty is high. * Sympathy. People who score high on this scale are tenderhearted and compassionate. They feel the pain of others vicariously and are easily moved to pity. Low scorers are not affected strongly by human suffering. They pride themselves on making objective judgments based on reason. They are more concerned with truth and impartial justice than with mercy. Your level of tender-mindedness is high. Conscientiousness Conscientiousness concerns the way in which we control, regulate, and direct our impulses. Impulses are not inherently bad; occasionally time constraints require a snap decision, and acting on our first impulse can be an effective response. Also, in times of play rather than work, acting spontaneously and impulsively can be fun. Impulsive individuals can be seen by others as colorful, fun-to-be-with, and zany. Nonetheless, acting on impulse can lead to trouble in a number of ways. Some impulses are antisocial. Uncontrolled antisocial acts not only harm other members of society, but also can result in retribution toward the perpetrator of such impulsive acts. Another problem with impulsive acts is that they often produce immediate rewards but undesirable, long-term consequences. Examples include excessive socializing that leads to being fired from one's job, hurling an insult that causes the breakup of an important relationship, or using pleasure-inducing drugs that eventually destroy one's health. Impulsive behavior, even when not seriously destructive, diminishes a person's effectiveness in significant ways. Acting impulsively disallows contemplating alternative courses of action, some of which would have been wiser than the impulsive choice. Impulsivity also sidetracks people during projects that require organized sequences of steps or stages. Accomplishments of an impulsive person are therefore small, scattered, and inconsistent. A hallmark of intelligence, what potentially separates human beings from earlier life forms, is the ability to think about future consequences before acting on an impulse. Intelligent activity involves contemplation of long-range goals, organizing and planning routes to these goals, and persisting toward one's goals in the face of short-lived impulses to the contrary. The idea that intelligence involves impulse control is nicely captured by the term prudence, an alternative label for the Conscientiousness domain. Prudent means both wise and cautious. Persons who score high on the Conscientiousness scale are, in fact, perceived by others as intelligent. The benefits of high conscientiousness are obvious. Conscientious individuals avoid trouble and achieve high levels of success through purposeful planning and persistence. They are also positively regarded by others as intelligent and reliable. On the negative side, they can be compulsive perfectionists and workaholics. Furthermore, extremely conscientious individuals might be regarded as stuffy and boring. Unconscientious people may be criticized for their unreliability, lack of ambition, and failure to stay within the lines, but they will experience many short-lived pleasures and they will never be called stuffy. Domain/Facet........... Score Conscientiousness..........49 Self-Efficacy............72 Orderliness..............25 Dutifulness..............72 Achievement-Striving.....48 Self-Discipline..........57 Cautiousness.............31 Your score on Conscientiousness is average. This means you are reasonably reliable, organized, and self-controlled. Conscientiousness Facets * Self-Efficacy. Self-Efficacy describes confidence in one's ability to accomplish things. High scorers believe they have the intelligence (common sense), drive, and self-control necessary for achieving success. Low scorers do not feel effective, and may have a sense that they are not in control of their lives. Your level of self-efficacy is high. * Orderliness. Persons with high scores on orderliness are well-organized. They like to live according to routines and schedules. They keep lists and make plans. Low scorers tend to be disorganized and scattered. Your level of orderliness is low. * Dutifulness. This scale reflects the strength of a person's sense of duty and obligation. Those who score high on this scale have a strong sense of moral obligation. Low scorers find contracts, rules, and regulations overly confining. They are likely to be seen as unreliable or even irresponsible. Your level of dutifulness is high. * Achievement-Striving. Individuals who score high on this scale strive hard to achieve excellence. Their drive to be recognized as successful keeps them on track toward their lofty goals. They often have a strong sense of direction in life, but extremely high scores may be too single-minded and obsessed with their work. Low scorers are content to get by with a minimal amount of work, and might be seen by others as lazy. Your level of achievement striving is average. * Self-Discipline. Self-discipline-what many people call will-power-refers to the ability to persist at difficult or unpleasant tasks until they are completed. People who possess high self-discipline are able to overcome reluctance to begin tasks and stay on track despite distractions. Those with low self-discipline procrastinate and show poor follow-through, often failing to complete tasks-even tasks they want very much to complete. Your level of self-discipline is average. * Cautiousness. Cautiousness describes the disposition to think through possibilities before acting. High scorers on the Cautiousness scale take their time when making decisions. Low scorers often say or do first thing that comes to mind without deliberating alternatives and the probable consequences of those alternatives. Your level of cautiousness is low. Neuroticism Freud originally used the term neurosis to describe a condition marked by mental distress, emotional suffering, and an inability to cope effectively with the normal demands of life. He suggested that everyone shows some signs of neurosis, but that we differ in our degree of suffering and our specific symptoms of distress. Today neuroticism refers to the tendency to experience negative feelings. Those who score high on Neuroticism may experience primarily one specific negative feeling such as anxiety, anger, or depression, but are likely to experience several of these emotions. People high in neuroticism are emotionally reactive. They respond emotionally to events that would not affect most people, and their reactions tend to be more intense than normal. They are more likely to interpret ordinary situations as threatening, and minor frustrations as hopelessly difficult. Their negative emotional reactions tend to persist for unusually long periods of time, which means they are often in a bad mood. These problems in emotional regulation can diminish a neurotic's ability to think clearly, make decisions, and cope effectively with stress. At the other end of the scale, individuals who score low in neuroticism are less easily upset and are less emotionally reactive. They tend to be calm, emotionally stable, and free from persistent negative feelings. Freedom from negative feelings does not mean that low scorers experience a lot of positive feelings; frequency of positive emotions is a component of the Extraversion domain. Domain/Facet........... Score Neuroticism................18 Anxiety..................23 Anger....................18 Depression...............41 Self-Consciousness.......29 Immoderation.............11 Vulnerability............27 Your score on Neuroticism is low, indicating that you are exceptionally calm, composed and unflappable. You do not react with intense emotions, even to situations that most people would describe as stressful. Neuroticism Facets * Anxiety. The "fight-or-flight" system of the brain of anxious individuals is too easily and too often engaged. Therefore, people who are high in anxiety often feel like something dangerous is about to happen. They may be afraid of specific situations or be just generally fearful. They feel tense, jittery, and nervous. Persons low in Anxiety are generally calm and fearless. Your level of anxiety is low. * Anger. Persons who score high in Anger feel enraged when things do not go their way. They are sensitive about being treated fairly and feel resentful and bitter when they feel they are being cheated. This scale measures the tendency to feel angry; whether or not the person expresses annoyance and hostility depends on the individual's level on Agreeableness. Low scorers do not get angry often or easily. Your level of anger is low. * Depression. This scale measures the tendency to feel sad, dejected, and discouraged. High scorers lack energy and have difficult initiating activities. Low scorers tend to be free from these depressive feelings. Your level of depression is average. * Self-Consciousness. Self-conscious individuals are sensitive about what others think of them. Their concern about rejection and ridicule cause them to feel shy and uncomfortable abound others. They are easily embarrassed and often feel ashamed. Their fears that others will criticize or make fun of them are exaggerated and unrealistic, but their awkwardness and discomfort may make these fears a self-fulfilling prophecy. Low scorers, in contrast, do not suffer from the mistaken impression that everyone is watching and judging them. They do not feel nervous in social situations. Your level or self-consciousness is low. * Immoderation. Immoderate individuals feel strong cravings and urges that they have difficulty resisting. They tend to be oriented toward short-term pleasures and rewards rather than long- term consequences. Low scorers do not experience strong, irresistible cravings and consequently do not find themselves tempted to overindulge. Your level of immoderation is low. * Vulnerability. High scorers on Vulnerability experience panic, confusion, and helplessness when under pressure or stress. Low scorers feel more poised, confident, and clear-thinking when stressed. Your level of vulnerability is low. Openness to Experience Openness to Experience describes a dimension of cognitive style that distinguishes imaginative, creative people from down-to-earth, conventional people. Open people are intellectually curious, appreciative of art, and sensitive to beauty. They tend to be, compared to closed people, more aware of their feelings. They tend to think and act in individualistic and nonconforming ways. Intellectuals typically score high on Openness to Experience; consequently, this factor has also been called Culture or Intellect. Nonetheless, Intellect is probably best regarded as one aspect of openness to experience. Scores on Openness to Experience are only modestly related to years of education and scores on standard intelligent tests. Another characteristic of the open cognitive style is a facility for thinking in symbols and abstractions far removed from concrete experience. Depending on the individual's specific intellectual abilities, this symbolic cognition may take the form of mathematical, logical, or geometric thinking, artistic and metaphorical use of language, music composition or performance, or one of the many visual or performing arts. People with low scores on openness to experience tend to have narrow, common interests. They prefer the plain, straightforward, and obvious over the complex, ambiguous, and subtle. They may regard the arts and sciences with suspicion, regarding these endeavors as abstruse or of no practical use. Closed people prefer familiarity over novelty; they are conservative and resistant to change. Openness is often presented as healthier or more mature by psychologists, who are often themselves open to experience. However, open and closed styles of thinking are useful in different environments. The intellectual style of the open person may serve a professor well, but research has shown that closed thinking is related to superior job performance in police work, sales, and a number of service occupations. Domain/Facet........... Score Openness to experience.....27 Imagination..............41 Artistic Interests.......43 Emotionality.............44 Adventurousness..........35 Intellect................19 Liberalism...............26 Your score on Openness to Experience is low, indicating you like to think in plain and simple terms. Others describe you as down-to-earth, practical, and conservative. Openness Facets * Imagination. To imaginative individuals, the real world is often too plain and ordinary. High scorers on this scale use fantasy as a way of creating a richer, more interesting world. Low scorers are on this scale are more oriented to facts than fantasy. Your level of imagination is average. * Artistic Interests. High scorers on this scale love beauty, both in art and in nature. They become easily involved and absorbed in artistic and natural events. They are not necessarily artistically trained nor talented, although many will be. The defining features of this scale are interest in, and appreciation of natural and artificial beauty. Low scorers lack aesthetic sensitivity and interest in the arts. Your level of artistic interests is average. * Emotionality. Persons high on Emotionality have good access to and awareness of their own feelings. Low scorers are less aware of their feelings and tend not to express their emotions openly. Your level of emotionality is average. * Adventurousness. High scorers on adventurousness are eager to try new activities, travel to foreign lands, and experience different things. They find familiarity and routine boring, and will take a new route home just because it is different. Low scorers tend to feel uncomfortable with change and prefer familiar routines. Your level of adventurousness is average. * Intellect. Intellect and artistic interests are the two most important, central aspects of openness to experience. High scorers on Intellect love to play with ideas. They are open-minded to new and unusual ideas, and like to debate intellectual issues. They enjoy riddles, puzzles, and brain teasers. Low scorers on Intellect prefer dealing with either people or things rather than ideas. They regard intellectual exercises as a waste of time. Intellect should not be equated with intelligence. Intellect is an intellectual style, not an intellectual ability, although high scorers on Intellect score slightly higher than low-Intellect individuals on standardized intelligence tests. Your level of intellect is low. * Liberalism. Psychological liberalism refers to a readiness to challenge authority, convention, and traditional values. In its most extreme form, psychological liberalism can even represent outright hostility toward rules, sympathy for law-breakers, and love of ambiguity, chaos, and disorder. Psychological conservatives prefer the security and stability brought by conformity to tradition. Psychological liberalism and conservatism are not identical to political affiliation, but certainly incline individuals toward certain political parties. Your level of liberalism is low. [/hide]
  19. According to that test, I'm an ENFP. Specifically, my results are this: Extroverted (E) 58.82% Introverted (I) 41.18% Intuitive (N) 52.5% Sensing (S) 47.5% Feeling (F) 61.54% Thinking (T) 38.46% Perceiving (P) 65.79% Judging (J) 34.21% When I look through the other descriptions of the personality types, I think that I'm most likely a hybrid between an ENFP and an ISFJ. I share an almost excessively large amount of traits with both of them, for example, social skills from ENFP and a want to ensure the safety of others from ISFJ. All in all, this was a pretty accurate test.
  20. I just found something. How useful would something like this be? I'm not too into the great lengths these guys went to blow their own trumpet, but it seems like a very useful item.The fact that multiple blades of different sizes comes standard helps, too. Something like this would be good for a backup weapon, or even close range. Not too sure about its ability to block a normal sword, though.
  21. I just found something. How useful would something like this be? I'm not too into the great lengths these guys went to blow their own trumpet, but it seems like a very useful item.The fact that multiple blades of different sizes comes standard helps, too. Something like this would be good for a backup weapon, or even close range. Not too sure about its ability to block a normal sword, though.
  22. Our 4 wheelers with wagons and tarps hooked to the back to carry the cans. What are you going to do when you run out of fuel?
  23. Our 4 wheelers with wagons and tarps hooked to the back to carry the cans. What are you going to do when you run out of fuel?
  24. You can fill it out at your leisure, though it would be beneficial if you done so at the soonest possible opportune moment.
  25. I'll refine this a little, if you don't mind. This is going to be pretty much a copypaste form; you copypaste the form into your post, type in your answer, and remove the description of the option before posting. Location- Where you're at most of the time on this planet. (ex. central West Virginia, though you can be more specific if you wish) Population Levels- The population density of your immediate area. (ex. small town/rural, can be more descriptive as needed) Supplies- All the stuff you have right nearby you (walking distance) that could be useful. (ex. good quality truck, scrap metal, rust, some canned food) Current survival plan- What you'll do in a nutshell to survive. (ex. gather supplies/other survivors, clear zombies from immediate area (low population, so shouldn't be hard), set up a stable base in the high school a couple minutes out of town (very easily defendable, has various things that could be useful), wait for someone to call out on the radios) Notes- Any additional useful info that you can provide. (ex. most survivors in my area will be skilled with firearms and have them in abundance, and are exceptional hunters, though might not get along well with others)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.