cryztalwing

Seems that antoher swarm of Earthquakes has in fact begun again at Yellowstone. The consensus seems to be that the swarm this time differs as it's much more concentrated in one area. This area arguably is a weak spot alongside the edge of the caldera, and as such poses a risk to the stability of yellowstone. This is days after the 7.2 quake in Baja California http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-quake-elevator6-2010apr06,0,6741167.story?track=rss

They want to have the One-Child Policy in the U.K. and in the United States also. One-child Policy is a success, says top Labour aide http://findarticles.com/p/news-articles/daily-mail-london-england-the/mi_8002/is_2009_Sept_22/child-china-success-labour-aide/ai_n38360907/ Obamas Science Czar: wants to have Forced Abortions and Mass Sterilization, rather if the people know they are getting sterilize or not , such as chemicals in the water supply or GMO Foods such as Spermicidal Corn and Rice that have been develop for that reason. http://www.prisonplanet.com/john-holdren-obamas-science-czar-forced-abortions-and-mass-sterilization-needed-to-save-the-planet.html

Over the last few months things have been heating up in our famous National Park and none of it is good. Over eight days, more than 1,270 mostly tiny earthquakes have struck between Old Faithful and West Yellowstone. The strongest dozen or so have ranged between magnitudes 3.0 and 3.8. These are beginning to become serious in size, as a growing swarm of course, but the vast majority have been too weak to be felt even nearby. The volcano last had a caldera-forming eruption 640,000 years ago and last spewed lava 70,000 years ago, which means it could have erupted along with the Toba super volcano. Geologists say Yellowstone could erupt again, although the probability of an eruption within anyone's lifetime is extremely low! I like those odds, but with all the weird things going on in the physical world these days, who knows? Ever since the Boxing Day Quake in 2004, the entire Pacific Ocean tectonic Plate has been re-adjusting. As a result, we started seeing increases in seismic events traveling north along the Japan Islands and South along Malaysia into New Guinea/Fiji/New Zealand. There followed more quakes traveling east alone the north and south edges of the plate, which being lightly occupied area mostly went unreported outside the seismological community. Inevitably the readjustment has arrived at the eastern edge of the Pacific Plate and we seem to be seeing increased seismic events along that edge, which is also the western edge of the Americas. Plate links to plate and the Pacific Plate connects to the Nazca Plate and Cocos Plates, which abut South America and link to the Caribbean Plate. The Pacific Plate forms the western side of the San Andreas fault along North America's west coast. So, we have had major quakes in Haiti and Chile. Not too long ago there was a rare major quake on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge along a fault junction that connects to the Caribbean Plate. Got that "Fall down, bounce around, shake the town, Earthquake Boogie!" So, follow me on this; The Pacific Plate thrusts underneath the North American Plate angling towards the east as it dips deeper into the Earth. The magma chamber under Yellowstone sinks down towards the west. Prior to the recent determination of the scape of the Yellowstone Mama chamber it was assumed that the Yellowstone Supervolcano was a "hot spot" volcano similar to the ones in Hawaii, but with the true scale and direction of the Yellowstone magma chamber currently understood, it seems more likely that Yellowstone is a classic subduction volcano. But whether Yellowstone is directly connected to the subducting Pacific Plate or not, in geological terms they are in close proximity and Yellowstone's lava, like that of all exploding volcanoes, contains massive amounts of dissolved gasses like CO2. Just as a sudden shock to a warm glass of soda pop will trigger an episode of increased fizzing, a major quake along the Pacific plate will send compression waves through the Earth and into the Yellowstone Magma Chamber and unbalance the current dynamic equilibrium of dissolved gasses. That might well trigger a significant eruption of Yellowstone?

According to China, you should get ready for a One-Child Policy. The Chinese government delegation at the Copenhagen climate change conference has argued that the Communist dictatorships one child policy should serve as a model for integrating population programs into the framework of climate change adaptation. And one of Labour's leading advisers in The U.K. agrees with this. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2009-12/10/content_9151129.htm

Greenpeace Leader Admits Arctic Ice Exaggeration http://eclipptv.com/viewVideo.php?video_id=6933

Back in August they snub FOIA requests to see the data, now in the climategate emails it looks like they instructed fellow scientists to delete incriminating emails subject to FOIA requests http://gnosis474.blogspot.com/2009/11/climate-gate-is-your-fight.html Not about the e-mails but rather the Codes Climategate Computer Codes Are the Real Story http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/climategate-computer-codes-are-the-real-story/

You think that's bad, than how about this? You would think that they would be glade and happy that an Al Qaeda operative was taking down by an Army Ranger right? Nope, they put him in prison for 25 years. So were is the "War on Terror"? Government withholds evidence, and Army Ranger goes to prison for 25 years for shooting an Al Qaeda operative. http://defendmichael.wordpress.com/

This seems to back up a report from September. The Cap and Trade that is going throw the Senate will make it were you have to get a License for your Home. You wont be able to sell your home unless you retrofit it to comply with the energy and water efficiency standards of the bill. I am sure some of you might see it as a good thing to force people to "fight" global warming, but I am sure most home owners wont like it.In effect, the bill prevents you from selling your home without the permission of the EPA administrator. Yet another scientific scandal has come to light which knocks another whopping crater in the already shattered theory of anthropogenic global warming. Eight peer-reviewed studies, which for years have played a significant supporting role behind the IPPCs claims of AGW, have been shown to be fraudulent http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/09/29/yamal_scandal/print.html

You do realize the administration has downplayed the idea of that? yes but it wont stop Congress from passing such a bill.

H.R. 3311 if pass will put an government GPS system in your car, rather you want it or not, and tax you for every mile you drive you car.

Congress is also working on to pass a new law were you are put on the no-fly list you are put on an "No Buy list". If your name goes on the no fly list you lose you right to own, possess, or buy a firearm. You get stripped of your rights without being arrested, charged, or convicted of a crime. Rahm Emanuel suggested this in 2007 but Carolyn McCarthy [D-NY] has submitted it to Congress. [hide=]the No Fly, No Buy Act (HR 2401), if passed the Senate it will merge the TSAs no-fly list with the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS), a point-of-sale system that determines the customers eligibility to purchase a firearm in the United States http://noworldsystem.com/2009/05/26/tot ... istration/ "Secure Flight," Insecure Travel Rights http://www.campaignforliberty.com/article.php?view=166[/hide]

No, Kira only kills people who deserve it. If we had a Kira the people who'd be dead would be Miley Cyrus, The Jonas Sisters, and Soulja Boy. The Rockefellers, the Rothchilds come into minde.

They want to determine if he really does or does not meet the natural born citizen requirement to be President. There are now 93 military members who are Plaintiffs including 8 Active and a large number of Active Reserves. The Defend our Freedoms website is Orly Taitz, Esq website, she is behind the lawsuit. She was also behind Lightfoot v. Bowen that was turn down by the U.S. Supreme Court http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/02/27/ ... ction.aspx

more military members are joining the State Reps lawsuit. http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=3983 http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/02/24/ ... -suit.aspx Leo Donofrio on 1st Lt. Easterling: He Did Not Defy Any Direct Order http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=4033

New video with Alan Keyes about the issue. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqkMfToY9Pk

No white President ever had their credentials as an American questioned. Scandal and political posturing are one thing but this, in my opinion, stems from race. It was seen throughout the campaign - the implication that Obama was Muslim, wasn't a "real" American and the general attempts to play upon prejudice. That goes beyond the normal murky world of politics and creates a horrible racial underbelly. Fair play to McCain, he personally tried to avoid those tactics (I remember him admonishing a person at one of his rallies for making such comments) however, many Republicans did attempt to make the implication and it is just a continuation of the "he isn't one of us" crusade which stems from the fact that he looks different from previous Presidents. As for Obama pulling the race card, I would also disagree. He deliberately went out of his way to not be just "the black candidate", instead he went out of his way to be the change candidate and appeal to white people. I can only recall one speech regarding race (addressing the Rev Wright controversy). He didn't play on race then so I see no reason why he would play on it now or in the future. The same issue as been around for McCain. In fact lawsuits have also been made agianst him for the same reason. Judge Tosses Lawsuit, Says McCain is 'Natural Born Citizen' A federal judge has thrown out a lawsuit seeking to remove John McCain from the California ballot because he was born in the Panama Canal Zone http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=5827998 Leo Donofrio's lawsuit that was turndown by the U.S. Supreme Court was agianst McCain, Obama and Roger Calero over the same issue. http://hubpages.com/hub/Supreme-Court-J ... ligibility This is information that weighs in favor of my argument that this is not a racial thing. Even though I consider Obama my white President, and I will continue to consider him that until people stop considering him a black president. He is just Mr President. In Statutory Construction, the meaning of the term Natural Born Citizen has to be interpreted according to the usage of the day it was used. At the time when the U.S. Constitution was drafted, everybody knew what is meant by the term "Natural Born Citizen" and they didn't have to define it in the Constitution itself because the latter is not a dictionary but a contract with the people. The Law of Nations has been international law, which as documented by Emmerich de Vatel (1758) states, in Chapter XIX, paragraph 212 (note the reference to plural citizens): "The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights." John A. Bingham (the chief framer of the related 14th Amendment of the Constitution): "Every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen." Obamas vote was one of the unanimous votes for Senate Resolution 511, which he co-authored. S.R.511 was about declaring McCain to be an natural born citizen becuse he was "Born to American citizens. Click on hidden to read the full text and a link to the bill online. [hide=]SENATE RESOLUTION 511 Whereas the Constitution of the USA states the qualifications of the President, a person must be a natural born Citizen of the United States; Whereas the term natural born Citizen, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1,is not defined in the Constitution of the United States; Whereas there is no evidence of the intention of the Framers or any Congress to limit the constitutional rights of children born to Americans serving in the military nor to prevent those children from serving as their countrys President; Whereas such limitations would be inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the natural born Citizen clause of the Constitution of the United States, as evidenced by the First Congresss own statute defining the term natural born Citizen; Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and enhanced by the men and women who are assigned to serve our country outside of our national borders; Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President; and Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born Citizen under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States. The Senate Resolution that was adopted unanimously, with Mr. Obamas approval, declares that natural born means born to American citizens. The plural use of citizens implies that the mother and father are both American citizens. As you may know, Obama's father was Kenyan. http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-sr511/show http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtex ... =sr110-511 http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200804/041008c.html[/hide]

Here is an CNN news report about the issue over McCain not being a Natural born citizen. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5RMw1a-C ... re=related

No white President ever had their credentials as an American questioned. Scandal and political posturing are one thing but this, in my opinion, stems from race. It was seen throughout the campaign - the implication that Obama was Muslim, wasn't a "real" American and the general attempts to play upon prejudice. That goes beyond the normal murky world of politics and creates a horrible racial underbelly. Fair play to McCain, he personally tried to avoid those tactics (I remember him admonishing a person at one of his rallies for making such comments) however, many Republicans did attempt to make the implication and it is just a continuation of the "he isn't one of us" crusade which stems from the fact that he looks different from previous Presidents. As for Obama pulling the race card, I would also disagree. He deliberately went out of his way to not be just "the black candidate", instead he went out of his way to be the change candidate and appeal to white people. I can only recall one speech regarding race (addressing the Rev Wright controversy). He didn't play on race then so I see no reason why he would play on it now or in the future. The same issue as been around for McCain. In fact lawsuits have also been made agianst him for the same reason. Judge Tosses Lawsuit, Says McCain is 'Natural Born Citizen' A federal judge has thrown out a lawsuit seeking to remove John McCain from the California ballot because he was born in the Panama Canal Zone http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=5827998 Leo Donofrio's lawsuit that was turndown by the U.S. Supreme Court was agianst McCain, Obama and Roger Calero over the same issue. http://hubpages.com/hub/Supreme-Court-J ... ligibility

Thanks :mrgreen:

Section 1 of Article Two of the United States Constitution contains the clause: No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States." The 14th Amendment does not convey the status of natural born Citizen in its text. It just conveys the status of Citizen. And its very clear that in the pre-amendment Constitution, the Framers made a distinction between a Citizen and a natural born Citizen. The requirement to be a Senator or Representative is Citizen, but the requirement to be President is natural born Citizen. From the 14th Amendment: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside. But even as to this conveyance of citizenship, those who were responsible for drafting the 14th Amendment made it clear that - to them - the meaning of subject to the jurisdiction thereof meant subject only to the jurisdiction thereof.

The issue is real, legislators joining in the effort that seeks Obama's birth certificate http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2009/feb/1 ... ks-obamas/

I dont believe anyone accused you of that though i think it was directed at what I said. Im not saying you are racists for wanting these claims investigated, but you should know that a lot of these were brought up by people trying to keep him out of office by spreading propaganda based off of his atypical appearence. Alan Keyes is one of the people behind the lawsuits and he is black. Obama is now trying to keep his records from public [hide=]'Sanctions' sought in eligibility case President's attorneys file motion demanding birth, college records be withheld from public A high-powered team of Los Angeles attorneys representing President Obama in his effort to keep his birth certificate, college records and passport documents concealed from the public has suggested there should be "monetary sanctions" against a lawyer whose clients have brought a complaint alleging Obama doesn't qualify for the Oval Office under the Constitution's demand for a "natural born" citizen in that post. The suggestion came in an exchange of e-mails and documents in a case brought by former presidential candidate Alan Keyes and others in California. The case originally sought to have the state's electors ordered to withhold their votes for Obama until his eligibility was established. Since his inauguration, it has been amended to seek a future requirement for a vetting process, in addition to the still-sought unveiling of Obama's records. In the case, being handled largely by Gary Kreep of the U.S. Justice Foundation, he recently subpoenaed the records documenting the attendance by Obama, or possibly the student when he was known as Barry Soetero, from Occidental College. The lawyer for the college, Stuart W. Rudnick of Musick, Peeler & Garrett, urgently contacted Fredric D. Woocher of Strumwasser & Woocher. "This firm is counsel to Occidental College. The College is in receipt of the enclosed subpoena that seeks certain information concerning President-Elect Barack Obama," he wrote via fax. "Inasmuch as the subpoena appears to be valid on its face, the College will have no alternative but to comply with the subpoena absent a court order instructing otherwise." Within hours, Woocher contacted Kreep regarding the issue, telling him, "It will likely not surprise you to hear that President-elect Obama opposes the production of the requested records. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php? ... geId=88746[/hide]

I am not being racists.

As you may know there have been lawsuits agianst Obama over the natural born citizen issue. Many of these lawsuits have all ready been rejected or thrown out by the courts. Some of them even went to the U.S Supreme Court over the last few months, all them have been turn down. Lightfoot v. Bowen Berg v. Obama Second Berg v. Obama Donofrio v. Wells Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz Schneller v. Cortes Thow there are still lawsuits active, including Bergs, and a new one looks like to be going foward with Tennessee lawmakers joining the suits to make Obama turn over his birth certificate and other documents. Obama as said his father was Kenyan not American and that is what a lot of the lawsuits are about, the United States Constitution requires that Presidents (and Vice Presidents) of the United States be natural born citizens. So do you think the lawsuits have any merit to them or just nonsense? I think IF Obama is not a natural born citizen, than the Constitution should be enforce, and he should be thrown out of office. [hide=]Several Tennessee lawmakers have signed onto a legal action intended to force President Barack Obama to turn over his birth certificate and other documents to prove his citizenship, an effort already rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court in another case. Tennessee Reps. Eric Swafford, Stacey Campfield, Glen Casada and Frank Nicely have all agreed to be plaintiffs in future legal action from a Russian immigrant in California who has challenged whether Obama meets constitutional criteria to be president. The lawsuit from the Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, which has not yet been filed, will be among several court challenges to Obama's citizenship. One of the cases reached the U.S. Supreme Court late last year, and the court declined without comment to take it up, a move many interpreted as meaning the issue was dead. The campaign posted a copy of his certificate on a page intended to counter rumors about Obama. Swaffords letter states I agree to be one of the plaintiffs in a legal action filed by Dr. Orly Taitz, Esquire for a Writ of Mandamus to obtain birth certificate, immigration records, passports and other vital records for Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Hussein Obama. The letter from the Pikeville Republican is written on the official letterhead of the state House of Representatives. Niceley, Campfield and Casada, who are also Republicans, confirmed that they too have agreed to be plaintiffs. Casada said that he believes that Obama does have a U.S. birth certificate, and should just make it widely available. Lets just put this to bed. Yes, people may say, youre just chasing some conspiracy theory, he said. Its a simple act on his part to just do, and were done move on. Democratic lawmakers ridiculed the legal action on Thursday morning at a weekly press conference, with one lawmaker asking, Whos Eric Swafford? and another answering, Hes from Mars. The news of the lawsuit later provoked ribbing around the capitol, with one legislative staffer approaching a lawmaker and demanding to see his birth certificate. http://www.tennessean.com/article/20090 ... 2/90212065[/hide]

If you like Gun control than H.R.45 is for you, thow if you don't than it is best that you try to get your Congressman to vote no on it. H.R.45 Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009. Here is what this bill would do if it pass. [hide=]If passed, this bill would require that anyone wishing to purchase, own, or possess a "qualifying firearm" - that's any handgun, and any long gun capable of accepting a detachable magazine - would have to be licensed by the state or the federal government in a licensing program managed by the Attorney General. (Even the guns you all ready own.) To get a license you would have to prove you're you, provide a passport-style photo, a thumbprint, and take a written exam which includes questions about firearms safety, safe storage, the risks of firearms ownership, and anything else the Attorney General deems appropriate. All transfers would be required to go through a licensed dealer with the exception of occasional gifts or bequests between parents, children (18 or over), and grandparents, or loans of not more than 30 days between "persons who are personally known to one another." (It actually says that. I'm not making this up.) And all transfers would have to be recorded in a "Transfer Record" established and maintained by the Attorney General. The bill also makes it a crime for a dealer to have shoddy records or fail to appropriately cooperate with any inspectors. It makes failure to report the loss or theft of a firearm within 72 hours a felony punishable by up to 2 years in prison. Failure to keep a firearm locked up in such a way as to keep it inaccessible to anyone under 18 becomes a federal felony too. It will make it illegal for you to possess guns you currently legally own unless you go jump through their hoops, register yourself and obtain a license. Read the bill for yourself . http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin ... ih.txt.pdf[/hide]