Unfortunately, spewing logical sounding crap isnt constituted as breaking a rule, nor the level of criticism I'd like to read here... It's some people's version of Glenn Beck's "I'm only asking the question!"... If it was really that illogical surely you wouldn't get upset about it because you know in your heart of hearts they are wrong? It is a bit rich for the staff of the Times to hit out at people that are posting negative things and calling them petty when they are being just that. Actually I would get upset, because not only is the illogical-ness of it infecting the rest of the community (have epople not recently shouted that the commnity is in the toilet?), but when people proceed to insult the writers personally, the line has been crossed... And I have every right to call a turd a turd, even if that turd can speak :) Obviously I can understand that as a writer getting unfounded criticism would be frustrating, but personally I would just take the view that these people are trolling and refer to the expression 'do not feed the trolls'. Calling them names and stooping to that level doesn't exactly help your situation.