Rebdragon

I don't even bother buying clothes, or caring what I wear at all (as has been stated). I actually wore out my shoes to the point wear my mom forced me to go pick out a new pair o_O. Oh, and over half my tee shirts I got from soccer tournaments and camps- I don't bother trying to find shirts I like, so I just wear those :lol: . Good description of me as well :lol: .

Gota say, I think I'm in the same boat as you- I'm terrible at dealing with that kind of stuff, even from a stranger :| .

Game. Of. False. Egos.

The Bible provides answers to metaphysical questions. They are either true or false. I believe they are true. Not really about knowing. What makes you think that there is no chance those answer can be true? What makes you think you know your answers are true? Responding to the bolded part- I never said that. I said no one knows [that they know] the answers, not that it's impossible. It's faith, belief- you're guessing. Anyways, your post pretty much brings up the age old point that "what makes your religion better than anyone elses?". Sure, "the Bible provides answers", but so do another couple billion books. There is nothing to say that the Bible isn't completely wrong and some other religion's right. Again, I'm talking about knowing, not believing.

I agree it's not clearly shown on earth. However, you could argue that all beatiful things in nature must have a creator or something similar. I don't see that as any real evidence, but saying that there is nothing that points towards his existence seems strange when there are such a vast amount of believers. I'm not saying these are strong arguments but my questions to you are really: Why do you think there are people like myself who are devout christians? Why do we want answers to metaphysical questions? Why are there scientologists? It's because you can't accept that you don't know (as well as Sat's points). I still find it funny that people laugh at agnostics, yet they're the only ones who actually know what they're talking about.

That has nothing to do with general relativity, at all. It's just that the [logically speaking] God is "extrauniverse", so It's not bound by this universes laws. That's really all there is to it- you don't even need to bother with the warping of time in this dimension.

Precisely. It's like arguing with an idiot who's got his ears plugged, who continually says "lalala, I can't hear you!" as you try to argue with them. You can't win an argument if the other person doesn't even know how to or try to debate, let alone have facts to back up their points.* Meh, I don't really have anything against religion, especially with all it's done for the modern world. I just don't like it when they present their beliefs as facts- just as you said, they aren't facts. It's faith. *I'm talking about religion in general, not you. Let's not have people getting personal; let's keep this on topic :-w .

Ya, and why would you even want a gif for a background? That'd just seem annoying if you asked me...

I killed a duck for 94 Magic.

I got near three million magic experience at Pest Control, as well as a decent amount of Defence experience :anxious: .

Finally, someone who knows what they're talking about when comparing WoW and Runescape. Took long enough for us to get one on this thread, or maybe even this forum for that matter. Anyone, if you want to say Runescape is better than WoW, rebutt his post. Let's see how long you last.

Man, just look back at my account on my profile :lol: . I was so much more of a moron when I first came here; thanks Off-topic, I've learned a lot :mrgreen: . Me, I like debating (as long as the responses don't get too long, that's just a burden..). Still, it's amazing the number of ways Tip.iters find a way to say (or at least try to make it look like) they didn't lose an argument.

about 6months ago if you wanted to increase your reaction time, i would have told you to play XBox live, halo 2 team swat when it was ranked... god damn that was a test of reaction time especially when you had to try to kill the guy with host rackin up the killing sprees Nah, try being a sniper in GRAW 2 :P . That'll increase your reaction time a bit o-O. Anyone got that quote from Striker6 about trying to justify playing Runescape? I think it'd be the perfect response to azn's post :-w .

What/who is that? :shock: !! It's Fullmetal Alchemist, Edward Elric! :shock: Where have you been :shock: !

Nothing human produces definite truth (from human perspective). Then again, nothing human produces perfection, but we still strive for it. We strive to be as close to truth as possible (through science), as we strive to gain perfection within ourselves. We will never fully gain it, but the more we try the closer we'll get. Of course. We all have egos, no matter how small they may be :-w .

hahahahaha no seriously?!?!?!?!?! u must be crazy, rs takes the LEAST skill to play out of all the mmo's i've ever played in my entire life there are NO skills, the drops are all in one spot, and u can out run EVERY monster Damnit, beat me to it. Runescape takes very little intelligience to play in nearly all of it's aspects (and all the hard parts have step by step guides...). The game's more of an escape than anything else.

My money back.

Eh... :| . Me, I've got nothing against capes, what I hate is the idea of people getting capes just for the glory of it. Meager "glory" in a a compute game. I mean, it's pathetic. Play for fun, not pixels :-$ .

Okay, I still have yet to understand the whole Chuck Norris fad. Sure, I know who he is, and the jokes are usually pretty funny, but what's up with that o_O?

People just can't grasp this concept, though. :wink: True. Non-buyable skills can be understood much more easily than buyable skills. Non-buyable skills are based on one simple factor- time. Now, if you ignore general relativity, that's pretty easy. You just look at the fastest way to train, calculate the experience per hour, and then calculate the hours to reach 99. There you have it, precise data on how easy it is to gain a 99 in that skill, compared directly to other skills. With buyable skills it becomes more complicated. Not only is time a factor, but money is as well. Now, instead of just being able to look at how many hours it takes, a viewer must expand their vision from a one dimensional scale to a two dimensional scale. That's going from an infinitely small point to an infinitely large flat plane. One now has to examine everything like a graph, the x-axis being time and the y being money. Different amounts of money lead to different requirements of time, and, to make things even more complicated, the time it takes to actually get the money is yet another factor (i.e. the z-axis). Bam, that's three dimensions. Now the viewer has to examine a 99 based on how fast they get money, how much time it takes to reach 99, and how money effects the amount of time the training takes. The fact that money gaining speed varies between players doesn't exactly help, either. So ya, put simply, it's infinitely (infinity squared o_O) more difficult to understand how hard it is to reach 99 in a buyable skill then in a non-buyable skill :) .

Okay, he isn't "real world" real, but he still owns them all :-w .

Pfft, if you even knew what my sig was about you wouldn't be saying that :-w . I think I might prefer if the person who rated this actually knew what they were rating :-k . 6/10, kinda says something about you and doesn't look half bad :P . fine... Naruto is boring... #-o :XD: =D> Please tell me you aren't saying what I think you're saying. Please tell me you're just being random. And stilev, curse Tip.it size restrictions, I've got my sig on maximum size >_<. 5/10 on the sig (ignoring the bottom, as you said). Iz not bad, kind of random :P .

Indeed. Even if you took a name that was original in the first place, as soon as you add numbers to it it is no longer original. Bottom line: if you have to add numbers to your name, it was never original in the first place. What if the numbers have meaning to you, and you added them even though the name without numbers wasn't taken? Sure, numbers don't look as good, but adding numbers doesn't automatically mean the name is unoriginal. Anyways... googled my name, 18 finds- six were from forums I'm on, one was from some spanish forum (the guy hadn't made a single post though :-s ), and the others were pretty much just YGO. So, my names original in the sense of being a [forum] username, but not in the sense that it actually came directly from a show :-w .

So wut r the hardest skills statistic wise?? :? Slayer, Mining, Agility, Farming, Runecrafting, all the ones that have been named over two dozen times. There are maybe one or two skills one can argue about, but there's really no point in it- we're arguing (if you can really call it that...) verified, definite quantitative data.

everyone judges everyone! something that is very hard to do, though is not say what your thinking. Kepp doing what your doing, and youll have plenty of friends. But some people, like me, are far more judgemental than others >_<. I confess to being terrible at phone conversation.