Rebdragon

SHUT the [bleep] UP. Christ.

Wait a second. Are you condoning perverted comments? The world wouldn't be a very pleasant place if everyone spoke their minds 100% of the time. I'm merely saying that the fact that someone makes such a comment does not give you a right to think yourself above them merely because you decided to withhold such a comment. We're men, we like breasts, it's basic evolutionary biology. Although being rude to someone's face is not something I condone, someone making a comment such as that to a group of friends, even if it is perverted and immature, does not necessarily put that person at a lower level of maturity to you in the cases where such a thought is much like an elephant in the room. I'm making this point not to condone being immature and perverted, but to bring light to my personal belief that statements of his like "95% of the people of in my class are drooling morons" are unjustified, and to be honest and to put it nicely, extremely snobbish. If you continually hold yourself as "above" the rest of your class, if you find them not worthy of you based on your own sense of how mature you are, you will never gain the social experience it requires for you to actually reach the level of maturity you think you are at. I just don't want you to cling to that belief so much it ends up hurting you in the long run :| . Chill out, if you don't want to be rude you don't have to make or verbally agree with some comments, but don't make that detract from your social interaction. You're 13, you're young; enjoy it while you can :P . [Note]

13? At that age marriage shouldn't even be in the back of your mind, so attractiveness is a legitamite factor in the dating pool (not to say that it isn't for marriage). But fair enough on the point of immaturity.

No, I'm basing my opinion more on an observation of the general population of this forum. A combination of general social inexperience as well as a sense of intellectual arrogance and arrogance of maturity (which, without social experience, is a complete paradox) leads me to believe that you think less of the people who say such things when such a belief is unjustified. Much like you they like attractive women, but unlike you they are more apt to verbally portray their opinions (extrovertedness). Not to say keeping such statements to yourself is wrong (in this case I'd say it's the opposite), but it's more of a case of an introvert not understanding an extrovert rather than a person truly knowing that someone is an [wagon].

This is the kind of thing where answers just pop up three days after you post. Id est, I can't think of anything right now but I know I have plenty of answers. Hahaha. So on the T&A spectrum I suppose you're more towards the A side? Or gay?

What's that program on the right? Looks useful. Oh, right: iPhone 3G.

http://www.newscientist.com/blog/shorts ... hot%20wife For real.

My friends know I did, even if I havn't gone to the website in months, let alone played the game. If it's embarrassing for ya'll to tell your friends, either 1) grow a pair, 2) not play, or 3) get real friends. Really, if you can't laugh at yourself once in a while you better as hell learn.

Just make things more conceptual. Especially history.

Pick up lines are retro. They're so bad they're good.

You make a good argument but, regardless, the quadrant of my brain designed solely for BS detection is going off. I have no idea why it's going off, what point is causing it to go off, none of that. All I can say is that it is.

Sounds like a great idea if you plan to be her [bleep].

He just has to make sure not to go Down South :D . /halfkidding

Please explain your poorly thought out statement. It's a pretty good an' old philosophical explanation of how we define things. Basically, we define things as what is and what is not "it". Using a hypothetical should help explain it. Let's say we enter a room, and in this room there is nothing but a four-legged wooden thing with two carved planks placed perpindicular to each other atop the legs. We can look at that and call it a "chair", but with nothing else in the room of differing characteristics and no prior knowledge of such a thing we can't really understand what makes that chair a chair. Now, after much waiting and pondering, a desk is added to the room, and from this we can further understand what makes that thing in the middle of the room a chair- the desk may have four legs like the chair, but it has no set place for a person to rest on. So from that we know that a chair needs a place for a person to sit down. After a few minutes, a seat with one thin leg underneath it is added to the room. We try sitting on it, but it falls every time. After some thinking we can define another characteristic of a chair after encountering this new object- beyond having a place to sit on, a chair needs to be able to stand up under the weight of a person. With the addition of new things like couches and beds we can continue to further define what a chair is by comparing it to things it is not. Eventually this will result in a set definition for what we call a "chair". Basically, if we can't define what something is not we can not truly define what it is.

How is that thought provoking in any way? So one person gets taught right and the other gets taught wrong; language has some leeway in slang but it doesn't go so far as to allow for people to mix up color terminology. Please, if what you're saying is intelligient or even remotely interesting in any way, enlighten me. Otherwise I'm just going to assume this is a worthless tangent.

Not really. The photon hits each of your eyes with pretty much the same energy. Unless one of you has broken/messed up retina (ie, colorblind), it's green for both of you mate. That, or your pulling some philosophy BS which honestly doesn't make any sense whatsoever.

Did I attack you in some way?

Right, like everyone who earned their wealth is Joe the Plumber.

I know a guy named "Blaze". No, unlike the complete moron in the OP, he did not legally change it. His name's just awesome by nature.

[Link snipped] ^ Based on the post time it's unbearably improbable that you even read the link. If you think I'm wrong at least say why. I'm pretty conservative is all. I'm just not a fan of redistribution of wealth.

Ugh, -_-.

I still don't get why everyone hates Bush :|. If it's because of the state of the current economy, for the love of God, read up on basic macro. If it's because of the war, think about what the general opinion was after 9/11. If it's because he's an idiot, considering he's probably smarter than you are that doesn't say much for your self esteem. Meh, I just hate the bandwagon.

[bleep].

Christianity and stupidity are not mutually inclusive.

Aww, do you hear that noise? It's the sound of my heart shattering into a million pieces. Just because you're not my type don't mean I don't love ya O:) . The lotta ya don't get any ideas though. I still hate the rest of you.