In chess if your opponent is well ahead (Eg, you are a queen+bishop+a few pawns down) it is good manors to resign. But if he can keep you from winning, well then its a draw. However, I still think that its rather rude to keep on simply avoiding the champions, since the other person was clearly out played. If I have a Bishop and a King facing your King, you were clearly outplayed because I managed to save more pieces than you. The reason it's a draw is that, despite the fact I may have played better, I still played poorly enough that you left me in a position where I could not achieve my win condition. Same goes in Conquest and any other strategy based game. Even if you play better, so long as you allow me to leave you in a position where you can not win, you should not be allowed to win... that's why win conditions exist after all. The goal isn't to play better than your opponent, the goal is to leave your opponent with no pieces left, and if you are incapable of taking your opponent's last piece, then you don't deserve a win. Yet a player who deliberatly doesn't end turns, makes fun of your playing skills, and admits that what they are doing shouldn't be allowed to happen, but they are doing it anyway to annoy you. Should still not deserve to win.