Well in f2p alot of people think a rune 2h is the best weapon available. Wel i realised that it is not. While being slow as a turtle, and having horrible def, it doesnt even hit that often. Why not just use a b- axe then? its max hit is only 1 lower than a 2h, its faster, and you can use a shield with it making your def so much better. Why even bother with a 2h then?

for k0s

Why have it for K0's when a B-axe can do the same thing?

I suppose it is just stubbornness and not realising that there are better weapons than it. Not your problem if they want to use it.

 

 

 

Why have it for K0's when a B-axe can do the same thing?

 

 

 

It is there choice what they use.

Depending on your strength level, r2h could hit 1 more than baxe for the K0 in BH.

also more acc and power

 

 

 

and looks better than a rune baxe k0

And since you wont swing out your "KO" weapon to often you want high accuracy and power.

well maybe that 1 damage can make the difference between winning or losing

Yeah, I personally think a 2H is strictly a finisher weapon.

 

 

 

I hate 2Hs in general for the reasons to stated. Slow, slow, slow.

 

 

 

While I have the possibility of hitting a 19 or 20 with a 2H once, I could hit 2 15s in that time with an rune scimitar.

Well the answer to your question is to create a variety for people

 

A scimitar is quick, but isn't the strongest weapon

 

A battleaxe is meh, okish speed, and pretty strong

 

A 2-hander is the slowest, yet the strongest (in f2p) of its class

 

People are given a variety which makes the game more fun, because some people decided, hey I want to use a battleaxe, or hey I want to use a bronze dagger #-o .

 

So THERE'S your answer :roll: