crit/rate/and teenagelos- i mean flame.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

your thoughts!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

crit/rate/and teenagelos- i mean flame.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

your thoughts!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sig is ok, colours dont really suit way to orange imo

 

 

 

Im not lkikeing the spray painted shading of the tree and sun as it doesnt match the rest of the sig

The shading on the sun is nicly done, and I like the sky.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

However, the shading on the characters/grass/tree/house is very poorly done. its very flat to where the rest of the world seems nice and full, and the sun looks much more detailed (read: it has depth) than the characters.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Also, not liking that comment about jake. for that i'll just stop here for C&C :x :/

The shading on the sun is nicly done, and I like the sky.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

However, the shading on the characters/grass/tree/house is very poorly done. its very flat to where the rest of the world seems nice and full, and the sun looks much more detailed (read: it has depth) than the characters.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Also, not liking that comment about jake. for that i'll just stop here for C&C :x :/

 

 

 

whos jake? :x

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On the tree, the branch looks wierd. :?

 

The shading on the sun is nicly done, and I like the sky.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

However, the shading on the characters/grass/tree/house is very poorly done. its very flat to where the rest of the world seems nice and full, and the sun looks much more detailed (read: it has depth) than the characters.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Also, not liking that comment about jake. for that i'll just stop here for C&C :x :/

 

 

 

whos jake? :x

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On the tree, the branch looks wierd. :?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

teenageloser.

 

 

The shading on the sun is nicly done, and I like the sky.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

However, the shading on the characters/grass/tree/house is very poorly done. its very flat to where the rest of the world seems nice and full, and the sun looks much more detailed (read: it has depth) than the characters.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Also, not liking that comment about jake. for that i'll just stop here for C&C :x :/

 

 

 

whos jake? :x

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On the tree, the branch looks wierd. :?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

teenageloser.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

bah that guy is way too critical.

nah its not a bad comment, he flames meh every chance he gets, besides i was only kiddin :P

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

sigh! i dont know how i did the sun like that, it just came out that way. (but, oooooh nad commented on mah sig!) hmm...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yeah the orange... not goin with the rest of it... i might change it back to blue later, i just wanted to see if i could get it in the evening.

It looks pretty good to me :)

 

 

 

Only the right guy in that full rune is messed (in my opinion)

I've always been a fan (the wirling one of course) of funny sigs even if i still love dark gory situations as well, if not even more. This enters the first class...so i should like it...as i actualy do. How much do i like it ? Unfortunately the answer is Not that much. Ok the style is fresh and cartoonish...but that's mainly all with the sig. First of all the concept is a little plain...it's just a normal trade...no real "Scam" going on or something particulary funny. The funny faces of yours kinda rise the sig quality but unfortunately that's the only graphical aspect that helps this sig go. The background is pretty embarassing...with cheap lineart and acid color choices, that make the desolated landscape even worse, if possible. The tree...yet having some dam solid borders and a flat 2d trunk, has a realy 3d look...that unfortunately fights with all the rest of the sig. The sun is shaded...but can a sun watched directly show any kind of shadows ? I mean...what gives the sun, the global lightsource....shadows ? :roll: I can't tell you to check it yourself in rl for obvious reasons... The character, on top of all the above, show sometimes lower detail than the background....and this means a lot...on the bad side. Plus their linework seems fastly made and not worked on. I Remember stuff from you, dated 2004 that was way better than this one... Sorry

really you like the old ones better? dont be sorry tj, you just laid on me some great cc and i thank you for even posting here (two great cc'rs in one post?? this is too much!) well i know that your like the pro at pixeling, but like which sigs? think you could describe it to me so i could figure out what to do?

really you like the old ones better? dont be sorry tj, you just laid on me some great cc and i thank you for even posting here (two great cc'rs in one post?? this is too much!) well i know that your like the pro at pixeling, but like which sigs? think you could describe it to me so i could figure out what to do?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Well you know the way i work... I try to get the most solid yet real-looking shading off my sigs. So i kinda prefer those sigs of yours that had a pretty solid shading. Simple and all according to your cartoonish style (Textures would ruin these sigs imo). Plus sometimes 2 bright doesn't mean more funny...that's what i think at least. You've improved a lot under some aspects (for example the dynamics and the filling of the spaces) but, and this is mainly related to my taste probably, you've lost something along the way such as a more 3d-like look. Personaly there are 2 ways you could take now. Totaly move on a 2d-cartoonish style (and this implies a LOT of work on the bg/sky detail/colors to make it work) or try to reach a good balance between cartoon and phisics.

 

 

 

And i say sorry cause i don't wanna look rude, yet sometimes my fast typing and laziness to go back and change stuff might give that feeling :)

hmm... ill give this more thought...

really you like the old ones better? dont be sorry tj, you just laid on me some great cc and i thank you for even posting here (two great cc'rs in one post?? this is too much!) well i know that your like the pro at pixeling, but like which sigs? think you could describe it to me so i could figure out what to do?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

no offense but.. this stuff was indeed better

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hey axe :P I love the background colours, but like the others said the characters and house could do with a lil more shading :D

I'm loving that mate that's a 8/10 good but the shading needs more time spent on it . 8)

 

really you like the old ones better? dont be sorry tj, you just laid on me some great cc and i thank you for even posting here (two great cc'rs in one post?? this is too much!) well i know that your like the pro at pixeling, but like which sigs? think you could describe it to me so i could figure out what to do?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

no offense but.. this stuff was indeed better

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

none taken, im gonna switch to my old style (line by line shading, yeah its a drag but if its what you guys want.) hi ant ;P