[TWR] RT cleaned TDMWL

[obfuscator]

Good job RT.

[Scorrtty19]

Maybe whole TDMWL list against whole RT list would be fairer.

59 vs 109? :roll:

 

 

 

Here is the vid: http://www.motionbox.com/videos/3098d5b8191fe5c1be

 

 

 

Enjoy.......

 

 

 

Oh and nice tanking Wolf. :

[unclebilly1]

Maybe whole TDMWL list against whole RT list would be fairer.

59 vs 109? :roll:

 

 

 

Here is the vid: http://www.motionbox.com/videos/3098d5b8191fe5c1be

 

 

 

Enjoy.......

 

 

 

Oh and nice tanking Wolf. :

 

 

 

No, he's saying the TDMWL list, which is currently 36 members and 114 average.

 

 

 

And just your main list, which currently has 47 members and a 121 average. You also used your trial list, which has an additional 20 members and a 118 average.

 

 

 

So actually, you could have pulled 67 members with a 120+ average to our 36 max and 114 average. He was just saying your 47-man list already gave you 11 more fighters and 7 combat levels, using the trial list also was just kind of overkill.

 

 

 

But apparently that's what was set up, so no big deal. I was just clarifying what he said. Still disappointed you guys allowed a fighter (Jorris) to fight when he clearly hadn't been on your ML, posting an 8-month old application hardly shows that he's been in your clan since that time. We've always gone out of our way to make sure our ML's are 100% accurate at the time of the fight, we always assumed others did the same.

 

 

 

Too bad I couldn't make this war . . . GF.

[Scorrtty19]

Well the reason is already told about joris. ;)

 

 

 

Oh and not all 20 ppl are warring on the other list (retireds) We can pull max 59.

 

 

 

Yesterday we pulled bad because the exam and vacation. But we lost only 3 ppl so it was not that bad. :)

[unclebilly1]

But we lost only 3 ppl so it was not that bad. :)

 

 

 

Wow. Gloat much? :roll:

[Kimberly]

Bit of bad luck that TDM forgot to request no FA/Trials. Otherwise, I think this fight wouldn't have been so onesided.

 

 

 

Still, RT was still the clear statistical winner. I think that's pretty clear from the levels and your turnout.

 

 

 

Poor TDM always seems to have someone DC :( Better luck next time, guys.

[Loge_05]

RT, 185; TDMWL, 50.

[Scorrtty19]

But we lost only 3 ppl so it was not that bad. :)

 

 

 

Wow. Gloat much? :roll:

Friendly ppl tdm have. 8-)

 

 

 

What I mean is that do u ppl think tdm won if we don't have joris?

 

 

 

Other thing is that your fight vs sow someone from sow going out of bounds and about that tdm don't make a problem and now RT was forgot to get 1 ppl on the ml and tdm make problems about that. :roll: Is that because u win vs sow and lost vs us, so when u lost u seek much faster to a rule breaking and making faster problems about that? Only a question to some tdm ppl who posted here.

 

 

 

Next time arrange the rule that we war only our mainlist. cu @ next war. ;)

[baalboy5]

I just don't like how you guys said you could pull 67 people with higher average while we only could pull 40~ with a lower average.

[darkriver3]

TDM accepted the war, so not my problem.

 

 

 

thnx for the war ;)

[unclebilly1]

But we lost only 3 ppl so it was not that bad. :)

 

 

 

Wow. Gloat much? :roll:

Friendly ppl tdm have. 8-)

 

 

 

Yes we do ;)

 

 

 

What I mean is that do u ppl think tdm won if we don't have joris?

 

 

 

I don't think anyone here posted anything like that. We didn't know about your multiple memberlists because we don't look at everyone's joining TWR topic to see how many they entered. Wolf posted that 4 ppl could have made a difference, again, we thought we were fighting a clan with 47 people, not 67. Obviously RT won this war, even TDM people said so. We did say we were disappointed that you guys don't keep an accurate memberlist. Expressing disappointment and protesting the victory are two different things.

 

 

 

Other thing is that your fight vs sow someone from sow going out of bounds and about that tdm don't make a problem and now RT was forgot to get 1 ppl on the ml and tdm make problems about that. :roll: Is that because u win vs sow and lost vs us, so when u lost u seek much faster to a rule breaking and making faster problems about that? Only a question to some tdm ppl who posted here.

 

 

 

Again, you're reading too much into it. Wolf posted that you guys brought 4 non-members, you provided a memberlist that accounted for 3 of them, and the issue is dropped. No one's protesting anything. As for SoW, their guy ran for the portal when the war was basically over. It made no difference in the war. Your guy fought the whole war, so he did have an impact. I agree it RT still would have won, regardless of the 1 person. As far as questioning the win, that was only brought up when we though 4 of your 23 were not from your ML. As it was, it was only 1, and we have dropped it.

 

 

 

Next time arrange the rule that we war only our mainlist. cu @ next war. ;)

 

 

 

We'll see.

[Uffan5]

RT, 185; TDMWL, 50.

 

I believe its over.

[Scorrtty19]

 

Again, you're reading too much into it. Wolf posted that you guys brought 4 non-members, you provided a memberlist that accounted for 3 of them, and the issue is dropped. No one's protesting anything. As for SoW, their guy ran for the portal when the war was basically over. It made no difference in the war. Your guy fought the whole war, so he did have an impact. I agree it RT still would have won, regardless of the 1 person. As far as questioning the win, that was only brought up when we though 4 of your 23 were not from your ML. As it was, it was only 1, and we have dropped it.

 

Yes it was only 1 person who we forgot to put on our ml. Maybe rulebreaking but going out of bounds it is also, last pile or not.

 

 

 

I believe its over.

 

 

 

Yes. Next time we war tdmwl again and I hope without problems after. :)