Which do you think is better ?

 

 

 

# 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

OR

 

 

 

# 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

OR

 

 

 

# 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

# 1 is currently my signature. I like them both and I can't decide.

 

 

 

And they're both too big for a signature rotator [unless you know one that takes 100kb images]

 

 

 

#2 and #3 are identical if not for the thicker border.

I like #2 best.

if you decrease the border of #3 by one or two pixels i like #3 best

I like #1. :

I like #1 best.

Did you actually make these or do you just take them off the NASA picture feed? :roll:

Did you actually make these or do you just take them off the NASA picture feed? :roll:

 

So you bought a farm, grew a field and placed a piece of agricultural machinery, or did you just find it and take a picture? :roll: :roll: :roll:

Did you actually make these or do you just take them off the NASA picture feed? :roll:

 

So you bought a farm, grew a field and placed a piece of agricultural machinery, or did you just find it and take a picture? :roll: :roll: :roll:

 

[hide=][/hide]

 

Sorry, but, PWNT

Did you actually make these or do you just take them off the NASA picture feed? :roll:

 

So you bought a farm, grew a field and placed a piece of agricultural machinery, or did you just find it and take a picture? :roll: :roll: :roll:

 

 

 

 

 

It's just ok for me to do it :mrgreen:

lmfao

Did you actually make these or do you just take them off the NASA picture feed? :roll:

 

 

 

No. I actually travelled 6,496 light years to the Messier Cluster in my rocket ship, and by using my warp engine was able to get there in a few days. As for taking the photo, I made a modified version of Hessi and then because it can't process visible light - I converted into the 300nm - 800nm range. I did this by beaming it back to the Spitzer Telescope which then again turned into a digital format using CCD technique. As for getting back to Earth, I took a left on M16 and travelled through the nearest wormhole.

 

 

 

Yes, I did all that.

 

 

 

If you didn't realize by now, this is not all my own work.

 

 

 

However I did create at least 60%. I copied the image from one of NASA's archives and then using some really complex and high-tech tools [paint and some other stuff] I fixed and enhanced the image by increasing the colour contrast, making it brighter, and better. I accented all the soft features and pumped up the sharpness.

 

 

 

Happy ?

I'd prefer it if you made your own space scene instead of just taking one off the nasa feed, but whatever thats not what this thread is about.

 

 

 

#2.

 

 

 

 

 

So you bought a farm, grew a field and placed a piece of agricultural machinery, or did you just find it and take a picture?

 

 

 

Terrible analogy.

I'd prefer it if you made your own space scene instead of just taking one off the nasa feed, but whatever thats not what this thread is about.

 

 

 

Yeah, but I suck at that kind of stuff. It's not that I'm not too "artsy". It's that I don't have the proper tools or training/experience.

Did you actually make these or do you just take them off the NASA picture feed? :roll:

 

 

No. I actually travelled 6,496 light years to the Messier Cluster in my rocket ship, and by using my warp engine was able to get there in a few days. As for taking the photo, I made a modified version of Hessi and then because it can't process visible light - I converted into the 300nm - 800nm range. I did this by beaming it back to the Spitzer Telescope which then again turned into a digital format using CCD technique. As for getting back to Earth, I took a left on M16 and travelled through the nearest wormhole.

 

 

 

Yes, I did all that.

 

 

 

If you didn't realize by now, this is not all my own work.

 

 

 

However I did create at least 60%. I copied the image from one of NASA's archives and then using some really complex and high-tech tools [paint and some other stuff] I fixed and enhanced the image by increasing the colour contrast, making it brighter, and better. I accented all the soft features and pumped up the sharpness.

 

 

 

Happy ?

 

 

 

:thumbup:

Uhh. Guys, these photos aren't from the NASA feeds.

 

 

 

They are actually from the internal agencies within NASA that catlogue star systems. This photo is taken directly from various space telescopes.

 

 

 

[Astronomers use several telescopes from diffent distances and declinations to get a "overall picture"]

 

 

 

:thumbup:

 

 

 

Did you find my comment mildly amusing ?

I'd prefer it if you made your own space scene instead of just taking one off the nasa feed, but whatever thats not what this thread is about.

 

 

 

Yeah, but I suck at that kind of stuff. It's not that I'm not too "artsy". It's that I don't have the proper tools or training/experience.

 

 

 

That's why I skipped the bull**** and just answered your question.

I'd prefer it if you made your own space scene instead of just taking one off the nasa feed, but whatever thats not what this thread is about.

 

 

 

Yeah, but I suck at that kind of stuff. It's not that I'm not too "artsy". It's that I don't have the proper tools or training/experience.

 

 

 

That's why I skipped the bull**** and just answered your question.

 

 

 

OK.

 

 

 

:|