Hegemony-V2 begins page 302

[VEGHATERMEATLOVER]

Mather, there is no way you could have finished fusion in like 4 years. I've spent the past 80 years or so on it. Literally.From day two.

Dusty, I really don't know who has what since there's been a lot of posts. Can people say what the colonies they have that differ from the first post are?

Lathers not using it.

 

You spent eighty years on it! That's a lot when some people are just using it like it's base tech.

 

One thing I find wrong in this thread is that in real life we wouldve already found way more types of science because everyones advancing but if we break one rule of physics we may not be actully breaking it due to a future version of physics.

 

Edit: can you put all my starting techs in but replace defensive missiles with expanding balls.

[The_Mather1]

Mather, there is no way you could have finished fusion in like 4 years. I've spent the past 80 years or so on it. Literally.From day two.

Because IRL research on it is being done by the U.S., therefore it is basicly just to continue where they stopped/succeded thus drasticly lowering research time.

Or are you talking fusion bombs, as I'm using nuclear fusion power not explosives.

[The Dark Lord]

[hide=Most recent map, put on front page][/hide]

[Seraphi]

I denied the Zhoreuc treaty, so I DO NOT have any land on that planet.

 

I have obtained Orojike in Sega-Res, and Ayuaro and Dowari in the Sinabo system.

 

Also, Hex, laws of physics don't change. The chances of them being proven wrong is next to nil. If you start on this "Breakthrough" BS again, I'm just going to start researching a black hole cannon because these "New" physics allow that.

[Wisp]

Mather, there is no way you could have finished fusion in like 4 years. I've spent the past 80 years or so on it. Literally.From day two.

Because IRL research on it is being done by the U.S., therefore it is basicly just to continue where they stopped/succeded thus drasticly lowering research time.

Or are you talking fusion bombs, as I'm using nuclear fusion power not explosives.

Fusion bombs are easy. You started over, you have nothing from the US. In the US we are still decades away from a breakthrough at best. Also, you have a tiny budget, and I don't remember you researching it at all.

[Hedgehog]

I'm beginning work on a colony on the gas giant (but only on one of the moons so far) in Meoxo, so you can just put my name on that as well.

[The_Mather1]

Also, Hex, laws of physics don't change. The chances of them being proven wrong is next to nil. If you start on this "Breakthrough" BS again, I'm just going to start researching a black hole cannon because these "New" physics allow that.

I think he meant that our solutions to "bypass" the laws of physics change, as do our view towards them. Black hole canons are even theoreticaly impossible as the gravity caused by the mass density required for a black hole would rip your ships apart miles avay from the mass itself thus unabeling anything to move/touch the physical mass of it.

 

Mather, there is no way you could have finished fusion in like 4 years. I've spent the past 80 years or so on it. Literally.From day two.

Because IRL research on it is being done by the U.S., therefore it is basicly just to continue where they stopped/succeded thus drasticly lowering research time.

Or are you talking fusion bombs, as I'm using nuclear fusion power not explosives.

Fusion bombs are easy. You started over, you have nothing from the US. In the US we are still decades away from a breakthrough at best. Also, you have a tiny budget, and I don't remember you researching it at all.

You better read some of my posts again as I said I would relocate and change species but not techs, that's why I never got any starter techs. And fusion power is almost fully researched IRL as it started as part of the Manhatten Project, thus leaving almost no reasearch time for us. :P

[Guest Mrmegakirby]

:twisted: Beginning research for black hole cannons.

 

[/sarcasm]

 

I am, however, beginning research on radiological weaponry. (Which is basically a nuculear bomb without a big-[wagon] explosion. It just spreads radioactive materials throughout an area. Would that be allowed?

[Seraphi]

You can't really bypass physics. Especially you guys, because you would come up with stupid tech, as you've already demonstarted countless times.

 

Kirby, I don't think thats allowed.

[Guest Mrmegakirby]

Ok, fair enough, is biological warfare allowed?

[The_Mather1]

You can't really bypass physics. Especially you guys, because you would come up with stupid tech, as you've already demonstarted countless times.

 

Kirby, I don't think thats allowed.

Finding other ways around doing almost the same thing without breaking any physical laws, that's what bypassing them means. Lol! :lol:

[Hedgehog]

Biological warfare is allowed. I have a hidden bunker still in Stockholm that holds my strain of a deadly weapon, if you can find it, you can have it.

[Guest Mrmegakirby]

Nah, I think I have a nice idea for my own lovely virus. Beginning research now.

[Wisp]

Also, Hex, laws of physics don't change. The chances of them being proven wrong is next to nil. If you start on this "Breakthrough" BS again, I'm just going to start researching a black hole cannon because these "New" physics allow that.

I think he meant that our solutions to "bypass" the laws of physics change, as do our view towards them. Black hole canons are even theoreticaly impossible as the gravity caused by the mass density required for a black hole would rip your ships apart miles avay from the mass itself thus unabeling anything to move/touch the physical mass of it.

 

Mather, there is no way you could have finished fusion in like 4 years. I've spent the past 80 years or so on it. Literally.From day two.

Because IRL research on it is being done by the U.S., therefore it is basicly just to continue where they stopped/succeded thus drasticly lowering research time.

Or are you talking fusion bombs, as I'm using nuclear fusion power not explosives.

Fusion bombs are easy. You started over, you have nothing from the US. In the US we are still decades away from a breakthrough at best. Also, you have a tiny budget, and I don't remember you researching it at all.

You better read some of my posts again as I said I would relocate and change species but not techs, that's why I never got any starter techs. And fusion power is almost fully researched IRL as it started as part of the Manhatten Project, thus leaving almost no reasearch time for us. :P

Uh, no it's not at all. So far we've found no way to control fusion, and it takes up way more energy than it puts out. You've already been crossing the line so many times with made up physics and stargate crap, don't push any further.

[Seraphi]

You can't really bypass physics. Especially you guys, because you would come up with stupid tech, as you've already demonstarted countless times.

 

Kirby, I don't think thats allowed.

Finding other ways around doing almost the same thing without breaking any physical laws, that's what bypassing them means. Lol! :lol:

I thought you meant "Skip past physics", which would be impossible.

Finding another way to obtain the same effect is fine, as long as it doesn't use SUBSPACE FOAM to power things or anything that includes stargate in any way shape or form.

[Hedgehog]

Just don't infringe on the rights that I have reserved on my virus then, or you will be sued, just like I did to Hex.

[Guest Mrmegakirby]

Mather, there is no way you could have finished fusion in like 4 years. I've spent the past 80 years or so on it. Literally.From day two.

Dusty, I really don't know who has what since there's been a lot of posts. Can people say what the colonies they have that differ from the first post are?

 

I currently control Yexenus of Fadou W system.

[Guest Mrmegakirby]

Just don't infringe on the rights that I have reserved on my virus then, or you will be sued, just like I did to Hex.

 

Haha, fair enough, what are your "Rights"?

[jasignhagj]

Did I miss something here? All of Aether's land is now Brittanian?

 

@ Jerusalem can i buy a small strip of China between Mongolia And Motherland Kazakhia?

 

My Budget

115 Bil.

SS Kazakhia (spaceship) - 60 Bil. 3/20

Port Uzbekia - (Spcaestation Orbiting Nova Kazakhia - 40 Bil. 3/16

Orbital Inter-System Missile Grid - 15 Bil, 1/100 (Will Speed up when i fund it more.)

[The_Mather1]

You can't really bypass physics. Especially you guys, because you would come up with stupid tech, as you've already demonstarted countless times.

 

Kirby, I don't think thats allowed.

Finding other ways around doing almost the same thing without breaking any physical laws, that's what bypassing them means. Lol! :lol:

I thought you meant "Skip past physics", which would be impossible.

Finding another way to obtain the same effect is fine, as long as it doesn't use SUBSPACE FOAM to power things or anything that includes stargate in any way shape or form.

Subspace foam actually exist, don't say I can't use the zero-point energy from it just because it has a silly name.

[Wisp]

You can't really bypass physics. Especially you guys, because you would come up with stupid tech, as you've already demonstarted countless times.

 

Kirby, I don't think thats allowed.

Finding other ways around doing almost the same thing without breaking any physical laws, that's what bypassing them means. Lol! :lol:

I thought you meant "Skip past physics", which would be impossible.

Finding another way to obtain the same effect is fine, as long as it doesn't use SUBSPACE FOAM to power things or anything that includes stargate in any way shape or form.

Subspace foam actually exist, don't say I can't use the zero-point energy from it just because it has a silly name.

If you mean quantum foam, which is the closest thing I could find that has the word foam in it, that's a theory, and it wouldn't help you.

[The_Mather1]

Also, Hex, laws of physics don't change. The chances of them being proven wrong is next to nil. If you start on this "Breakthrough" BS again, I'm just going to start researching a black hole cannon because these "New" physics allow that.

I think he meant that our solutions to "bypass" the laws of physics change, as do our view towards them. Black hole canons are even theoreticaly impossible as the gravity caused by the mass density required for a black hole would rip your ships apart miles avay from the mass itself thus unabeling anything to move/touch the physical mass of it.

 

Mather, there is no way you could have finished fusion in like 4 years. I've spent the past 80 years or so on it. Literally.From day two.

Because IRL research on it is being done by the U.S., therefore it is basicly just to continue where they stopped/succeded thus drasticly lowering research time.

Or are you talking fusion bombs, as I'm using nuclear fusion power not explosives.

Fusion bombs are easy. You started over, you have nothing from the US. In the US we are still decades away from a breakthrough at best. Also, you have a tiny budget, and I don't remember you researching it at all.

You better read some of my posts again as I said I would relocate and change species but not techs, that's why I never got any starter techs. And fusion power is almost fully researched IRL as it started as part of the Manhatten Project, thus leaving almost no reasearch time for us. :P

Uh, no it's not at all. So far we've found no way to control fusion, and it takes up way more energy than it puts out. You've already been crossing the line so many times with made up physics and stargate crap, don't push any further.

On May 30, 2009, the US Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, primarily a weapons lab, announced the creation of a high-energy laser system, the National Ignition Facility, which can heat hydrogen atoms to temperatures only existing in nature in the cores of stars. The new laser is expected to have the ability to produce, for the first time, more energy from controlled, inertially-confined nuclear fusion than was required to initiate the reaction.

 

You can't really bypass physics. Especially you guys, because you would come up with stupid tech, as you've already demonstarted countless times.

 

Kirby, I don't think thats allowed.

Finding other ways around doing almost the same thing without breaking any physical laws, that's what bypassing them means. Lol! :lol:

I thought you meant "Skip past physics", which would be impossible.

Finding another way to obtain the same effect is fine, as long as it doesn't use SUBSPACE FOAM to power things or anything that includes stargate in any way shape or form.

Subspace foam actually exist, don't say I can't use the zero-point energy from it just because it has a silly name.

If you mean quantum foam, which is the closest thing I could find that has the word foam in it, that's a theory, and it wouldn't help you.

OTTER RIDGE, WA -- Dr. Ivan Patel, quantum physics professor at the University of Spokane, has proved without a doubt something that cute girl in your history class has always known: you do not exist.

 

"When we examined the fabric of the universe around you, accounted for the gravitational effects of microscopic black holes, and dredged the subspace foam: we couldn't find you anywhere. Our only conclusion based on available evidence is that you simply just do not exist," said Dr. Patel. "Sorry," he added with a shrug.

[Wisp]

Also, Hex, laws of physics don't change. The chances of them being proven wrong is next to nil. If you start on this "Breakthrough" BS again, I'm just going to start researching a black hole cannon because these "New" physics allow that.

I think he meant that our solutions to "bypass" the laws of physics change, as do our view towards them. Black hole canons are even theoreticaly impossible as the gravity caused by the mass density required for a black hole would rip your ships apart miles avay from the mass itself thus unabeling anything to move/touch the physical mass of it.

 

Mather, there is no way you could have finished fusion in like 4 years. I've spent the past 80 years or so on it. Literally.From day two.

Because IRL research on it is being done by the U.S., therefore it is basicly just to continue where they stopped/succeded thus drasticly lowering research time.

Or are you talking fusion bombs, as I'm using nuclear fusion power not explosives.

Fusion bombs are easy. You started over, you have nothing from the US. In the US we are still decades away from a breakthrough at best. Also, you have a tiny budget, and I don't remember you researching it at all.

You better read some of my posts again as I said I would relocate and change species but not techs, that's why I never got any starter techs. And fusion power is almost fully researched IRL as it started as part of the Manhatten Project, thus leaving almost no reasearch time for us. :P

Uh, no it's not at all. So far we've found no way to control fusion, and it takes up way more energy than it puts out. You've already been crossing the line so many times with made up physics and stargate crap, don't push any further.

On May 30, 2009, the US Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, primarily a weapons lab, announced the creation of a high-energy laser system, the National Ignition Facility, which can heat hydrogen atoms to temperatures only existing in nature in the cores of stars. The new laser is expected to have the ability to produce, for the first time, more energy from controlled, inertially-confined nuclear fusion than was required to initiate the reaction.

You don't really know anything about fusion do you? Either way, are you at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in the US?

[The_Mather1]

Also, Hex, laws of physics don't change. The chances of them being proven wrong is next to nil. If you start on this "Breakthrough" BS again, I'm just going to start researching a black hole cannon because these "New" physics allow that.

I think he meant that our solutions to "bypass" the laws of physics change, as do our view towards them. Black hole canons are even theoreticaly impossible as the gravity caused by the mass density required for a black hole would rip your ships apart miles avay from the mass itself thus unabeling anything to move/touch the physical mass of it.

 

Mather, there is no way you could have finished fusion in like 4 years. I've spent the past 80 years or so on it. Literally.From day two.

Because IRL research on it is being done by the U.S., therefore it is basicly just to continue where they stopped/succeded thus drasticly lowering research time.

Or are you talking fusion bombs, as I'm using nuclear fusion power not explosives.

Fusion bombs are easy. You started over, you have nothing from the US. In the US we are still decades away from a breakthrough at best. Also, you have a tiny budget, and I don't remember you researching it at all.

You better read some of my posts again as I said I would relocate and change species but not techs, that's why I never got any starter techs. And fusion power is almost fully researched IRL as it started as part of the Manhatten Project, thus leaving almost no reasearch time for us. :P

Uh, no it's not at all. So far we've found no way to control fusion, and it takes up way more energy than it puts out. You've already been crossing the line so many times with made up physics and stargate crap, don't push any further.

On May 30, 2009, the US Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, primarily a weapons lab, announced the creation of a high-energy laser system, the National Ignition Facility, which can heat hydrogen atoms to temperatures only existing in nature in the cores of stars. The new laser is expected to have the ability to produce, for the first time, more energy from controlled, inertially-confined nuclear fusion than was required to initiate the reaction.

You don't really know anything about fusion do you? Either way, are you at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in the US?

I ain't there but I know nuclear fusion is the reaction when two or more atoms merge together into one, this requires a certain amount of heat to be possible and the reaction when they form together gives of heat which can then be used to produce electricity.

[jasignhagj]

Fission can produce energy but it is highly inefficient