Retech Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 I've got you for that, Ross.I'm on my phone, I CBA to check GDP but seriously, Mexicos got barely any GDP and is going to beninvaded by Retech.Because that worked brilliantly, didn't it. It would've of worked if other countrys hadn't unfairly protected you. Unfairly? I think you already had the general idea that other countries would seize the chance to prove themselves worthy of remaining on Earth by opposing your tyanny. Master of your domain? I am Lord of the manor, Queen of the castle, King of the county! Former moderator of the original DungeoneeringFormer moderator of Ye Olde HegemonyModerator of the remake of DungeoneeringFormer Empress of the Lichten Empire (Hegemony)Former President of the United States (Hegemony)Former Emporer of Imperial Japan (Hegemony)Czarina Catherine of Imperial Russia (Hegemony The only difference between a disagreement between friends, an argument between strangers, and a feud between enemies is the ability to reconcile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wisp Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 Mexico has a higher gdp than India, or it did 10 years ago. And Australia. And Russia. By far. Hegemony-Spain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VEGHATERMEATLOVER Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 It would've of worked if other countrys hadn't unfairly protected you.Yeah because we have to sit back when you invade another player. Ok, you didn't do anything. Unfairly? I think you already had the general idea that other countries would seize the chance to prove themselves worthy of remaining on Earth by opposing your tyanny.No, why would other countrys prove themselves worthy of remaining on earth? I didn't attacked you. Doom, I was on my phone. I didn't know, I assume its not right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retech Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 Well considering I'm the United States, I do have a history of intervening all over the world. I'm trying to cut back on that now, to find a healthy balance between Dusty's interventionism and Doom's isolationism. Master of your domain? I am Lord of the manor, Queen of the castle, King of the county! Former moderator of the original DungeoneeringFormer moderator of Ye Olde HegemonyModerator of the remake of DungeoneeringFormer Empress of the Lichten Empire (Hegemony)Former President of the United States (Hegemony)Former Emporer of Imperial Japan (Hegemony)Czarina Catherine of Imperial Russia (Hegemony The only difference between a disagreement between friends, an argument between strangers, and a feud between enemies is the ability to reconcile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VEGHATERMEATLOVER Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 Well considering I'm the United States, I do have a history of intervening all over the world. Yeh [bleep] you, there wasn't any WMD's in iraq!!!Oh wait, this was him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wisp Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 Well considering I'm the United States, I do have a history of intervening all over the world. I'm trying to cut back on that now, to find a healthy balance between Dusty's interventionism and Doom's isolationism.For what it's worth, Dusty and I ended up being the most powerful countries in the first game (Dusty wasn't that active in the 2nd game, but I controlled a whole continent plus some then, so I was pretty well off), so it would seem that each extreme has it's benefits. Hegemony-Spain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grim_ Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 Well it would depend upon how you play it and how lucky you are as well as the placement of your country (europe is the epicenter in this game while last game it was slightly different)EDIT: Hex after you said that a sizable fleet was being sent to destroy your coastal cities (going from north to south)EDIT EDIT: Hex you said your troops were using M16-A1s right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wisp Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 Well, it would seem that in Europe Interventionism would be good, seeing as that's where the action is. In south america, I had no competitors for 2 games, so isolationism works there.And I really wasn't as isolationist as everyone says, I was very close allies with one other country. It's just no one messed with my interests usually, and when they did I fought a few wars. Hegemony-Spain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grim_ Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 Heh I wonder what would happen if your played isolationist in europe (well if you were in the north) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VEGHATERMEATLOVER Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 Grim, your not playing properly then.You need to make ships before and you haven't done that. My troops are all equipped with m16's, Kalashnikovs and a glock (mark III) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grim_ Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 How do you know I did not have ships (I don't post half of what I do [kinda puts a load on archi though]) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wisp Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 Grim, your not playing properly then.You need to make ships before and you haven't done that. My troops are all equipped with m16's, Kalashnikovs and a glock (mark III)Can you please just call them Ak-47's? And I have no idea why you would use those anyway, there are better AK variants at this point. Also, your troops aren't equipped with glocks. Glock is a company, and if anyone else makes their guns, it's not a glock. Also, Colt, and Glock sue you for stealing the designs for their weapons, and producing them illegally. Calling a gun a Kalashnikov could refer to a ton of guns, including the RPK, or even a pp-19 (designed by Mikhail's son) Hegemony-Spain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grim_ Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 So your troops are using what model of M16s? A1s? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wisp Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 Also, your supplies are HUGELY stretched. Your using 5.56x45 and 7.62x32 ammunition for your assault rifles. Also, why do you even have your troops carry multiple assault rifles? Hegemony-Spain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grim_ Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 Or you know you could reload but I guess that would be crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wisp Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 Or you know you could reload but I guess that would be crazy.The point is he's having his troops carry two different guns designed for the same roll, using two different types of ammunition. Meaning they need to carry extra clips for both guns. Hegemony-Spain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VEGHATERMEATLOVER Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 I got confused between an mp5, and with the amount of money i'm putting into my army I can.Unless no-one minds me switching to an mp5, they have two assult rifles. Incase one breaks or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VEGHATERMEATLOVER Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 I'm no invading Iran ATM though. Can I switch to mp5? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grim_ Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 Yeah but which would you switch it out with? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VEGHATERMEATLOVER Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 MP5K's with an optional suppresor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wisp Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 An mp5k is a small smg. AK-47s and m16's are assault rifles. Don't give all your troops one gun. You might decide to switch the main battle rifle if you feel like it to something else, but as of now, your troops are carrying 15 extra pounds of gear (the gun, ammunition, and accessories) on their back for no reason. Hegemony-Spain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VEGHATERMEATLOVER Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 Yeh, I got confused - I thought an M16 was a mp5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mrmegakirby Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 Sending 30 billion dollars worth of bombers, fighters and tanks to base in thailand as soon as they're ready. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nero Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 Hellz yea my maps are getting better. Vienna Raszyn Warsaw Klushino Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VEGHATERMEATLOVER Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 Dusty! did you make that, its amazing. Spending 50 billion on making an army of 2 million + guns + tents.Ready in three years.body armour, Uniform, Ak-47, aa12 shotguns and lots of ammo. 1,256,204,700,049_____________________--50,000,000,000 (Army)-5,000,000 (tech)_______________________1,206,199,700,049 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts